Simulating the acoustic response of cavities to improve microphone array measurements in closed test section wind tunnels

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Colin Vandercreek (TU Delft - Aircraft Noise and Climate Effects)

F Avallone (TU Delft - Wind Energy)

Daniele Ragni (TU Delft - Wind Energy)

M Snellen (TU Delft - Aircraft Noise and Climate Effects)

Research Group
Aircraft Noise and Climate Effects
Copyright
© 2022 Colin VanDercreek, F. Avallone, D. Ragni, M. Snellen
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0009274
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Colin VanDercreek, F. Avallone, D. Ragni, M. Snellen
Related content
Research Group
Aircraft Noise and Climate Effects
Issue number
1
Volume number
151
Pages (from-to)
322-333
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Cavities placed along wind tunnel walls can attenuate the turbulent boundary layer (TBL) fluctuations as they propagate into the cavity. Placing microphones within the cavities can thus improve the signal-to-noise ratio of acoustic data. However, standing waves form within these cavities distorting the acoustic measurements. This work uses a finite element (FE) solver to evaluate how cavity geometry (depth, diameter, and wall angle) and wall material (hard-walled and melamine foam) affect the amplitude and eigenfrequency of standing waves when excited by an incident acoustic plane wave. Good agreement between predicted and measured acoustic transfer functions is shown. Compared to cylindrical cavities, countersunk and conical cavities improve the overall response, i.e., reducing the quality factor quantifying the resonance and damping characteristics. Stainless steel coverings also reduce the quality factor. A finding is that the shape of the external foam holder rather than the cavity shape drives the standing wave characteristics for the melamine foam cavities. The optimization problem of minimizing the acoustic response while also attenuating the TBL is thus decoupled by using the melamine foam. Consequently, these considerations can be addressed independently by optimizing the outer cavity shape for acoustics and the melamine foam insert for TBL attenuation.