Assessment of laparoscopic instrument reprocessing in rural India

Assessment of laparoscopic instrument reprocessing in rural India: a mixed methods study

Robertson, P.D. (TU Delft Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)
Gnanaraj, Jesudian (Shanthi Bhavan Medical Center)
Wauben, L.S.G.L. (TU Delft Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)
Huijs, Jan (Heart Consultancy)
Samuel, Vasanth Mark (Christian Medical College Hospital)
Dankelman, J. (TU Delft Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)
Horeman, T. (TU Delft Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology)

2021

Background: Laparoscopy is a minimally-invasive surgical procedure that uses long slender instruments that require much smaller incisions than conventional surgery. This leads to faster recovery times, fewer post-surgical wound infections and shorter hospital stays. For these reasons, laparoscopy could be particularly advantageous to patients in low to middle income countries (LMICs). Unfortunately, sterile processing departments in LMIC hospitals are faced with limited access to equipment and trained staff which poses an obstacle to safe surgical care. The reprocessing of laparoscopic devices requires specialised equipment and training. Therefore, when LMIC hospitals invest in laparoscopy, an update of the standard operating procedure in sterile processing is required. Currently, it is unclear whether LMIC hospitals, that already perform laparoscopy, have managed to introduce updated reprocessing methods that minimally invasive equipment requires. The aim of this study was to identify the laparoscopic sterile reprocessing procedures in rural India and to test the effectiveness of the sterilisation equipment. Methods: We assessed laparoscopic instrument sterilisation capacity in four rural hospitals in different states in India using a mixed-methods approach. As the main form of data collection, we developed a standardised observational checklist based on reprocessing guidelines from several sources. Steam autoclave performance was measured by monitoring the autoclave cycles in two hospitals. Finally, the findings from the checklist data was supported by an interview survey with surgeons and nurses. Results: The checklist data revealed the reprocessing methods the hospitals used in the reprocessing of laparoscopic instruments. It showed that the standard operating procedures had not been updated since the introduction of laparoscopy and the same reprocessing methods for regular surgical instruments were still applied. The interviews confirmed that staff had not received additional training and that they were unaware of the hazardous effects of reprocessing detergents and disinfectants. Conclusion: As laparoscopy is becoming more prevalent in LMICs, updated policy is needed to incorporate minimally invasive instrument reprocessing in medical practitioner and staff training programmes. While reprocessing standards improve, it is essential to develop instruments and reprocessing equipment that is more suitable for resource-constrained rural surgical environments.

Global health
Laparoscopy
LMIC
Sterile reprocessing

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:39958b52-1e0c-4e26-a247-5d3b4c615452

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00976-x

Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 10 (1)

Institutional Repository

journal article

© 2021 P.D. Robertson, Jesudian Gnanaraj, L.S.G.L. Wauben, Jan Huijs, Vasanth Mark Samuel, J. Dankelman, T. Horeman