Machine Learning Against Terrorism

Machine Learning Against Terrorism: How Big Data Collection and Analysis Influences the Privacy-Security Dilemma

Verhelst, H.M. (TU Delft Numerical Analysis; TU Delft Ship Hydromechanics and Structures)
Stannat, A.W. (TU Delft Data-Intensive Systems)
Mecacci, G. (Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen)

2020

Rapid advancements in machine learning techniques allow mass surveillance to be applied on larger scales and utilize more and more personal data. These developments demand reconsideration of the privacy-security dilemma, which describes the tradeoffs between national security interests and individual privacy concerns. By investigating mass surveillance techniques that use bulk data collection and machine learning algorithms, we show why these methods are unlikely to pinpoint terrorists in order to prevent attacks. The diverse characteristics of terrorist attacks—especially when considering lone-wolf terrorism—lead to irregular and isolated (digital) footprints. The irregularity of data affects the accuracy of machine learning algorithms and the mass surveillance that depends on them which can be explained by three kinds of known problems encountered in machine learning theory: class imbalance, the curse of dimensionality, and spurious correlations. Proponents of mass surveillance often invoke the distinction between collecting data and metadata, in which the latter is understood as a lesser breach of privacy. Their arguments commonly overlook the ambiguity in the definitions of data and metadata and ignore the ability of machine learning techniques to infer the former from the latter. Given the sparsity of datasets used for machine learning in counterterrorism and the privacy risks attendant with bulk data collection, policymakers and other relevant stakeholders should critically re-evaluate the likelihood of success of the algorithms and the collection of data on which they depend.

Machine learning
Mass surveillance
Metadata collection
National security
Privacy-security dilemma

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:40e40805-353f-496e-8470-b502fe88a9f3

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00254-w

1353-3452

Science & Engineering Ethics, 26 (6), 2975-2984

Institutional Repository

journal article

© 2020 H.M. Verhelst, A.W. Stannat, G. Mecacci