Corrigendum to “Cascaded incremental nonlinear dynamic inversion control for MAV disturbance rejection”[Journal of Control Engineering Practice 73 (2018) 79–90, (S0967066118300030), (10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.01.003)]

Corrigendum to “Cascaded incremental nonlinear dynamic inversion control for MAV disturbance rejection”[Journal of Control Engineering Practice 73 (2018) 79–90, (S0967066118300030), (10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.01.003)]

Smeur, E.J.J. (TU Delft Control & Simulation)
de Croon, G.C.H.E. (TU Delft Control & Simulation)
Chu, Q. P. (TU Delft Control & Simulation)

2023

The authors regret to inform that an incorrect transfer function was included in Eq. (12). The correct transfer function is: [Formula Presented] The selected gains were [Formula Presented]. This leads to a real pole at 0.964 and two complex poles at 0.965 ± 0.0445i. The difference of the model compared to the measured step response has now reduced, the largest difference being 4.8% of the final step value at 0.14 s. The mistake does not influence any of the conclusions drawn in the paper. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:49b721f7-bfbb-45c5-9d9a-4cf9e938fe4c

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2022.105093

0967-0661

Control Engineering Practice, 141

Institutional Repository

journal article

© 2023 E.J.J. Smeur, G.C.H.E. de Croon, Q. P. Chu