Mtac2

Mtac2: Typed tactics for backward reasoning in Coq

Kaiser, Jan-Oliver (Max Planck Institute for Software Systems (MPI-SWS))
Ziliani, Beta (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET))
Krebbers, R.J. (TU Delft Programming Languages)
Régis-Gianas, Yann (CNRS)
Dreyer, Derek (Max Planck Institute for Software Systems (MPI-SWS))

2018

Coq supports a range of built-in tactics, which are engineered primarily to support backward reasoning. Starting from a desired goal, the Coq programmer can use these tactics to manipulate the proof state interactively, applying axioms or lemmas to break the goal into subgoals until all subgoals have been solved. Additionally, it provides support for tactic programming via OCaml and Ltac, so that users can roll their own custom proof automation routines.
Unfortunately, though, these tactic languages share a significant weakness. They do not offer the tactic programmer any static guarantees about the soundness of their custom tactics, making large tactic developments difficult to maintain. To address this limitation, Ziliani et al. previously proposed Mtac, a new typed approach to custom proof automation in Coq which provides the static guarantees that OCaml and Ltac are missing. However, despite its name, Mtac is really more of a metaprogramming language than it is a full-blown tactic language: it misses an essential feature of tactic programming, namely the ability to directly manipulate Coq’s proof state and perform backward reasoning on it.
In this paper, we present Mtac2, a next-generation version of Mtac that combines its support for typed metaprogramming with additional support for the programming of backward-reasoning tactics in the style of Ltac. In so doing, Mtac2 introduces a novel feature in tactic programming languages—what we call typed backward reasoning. With this feature, Mtac2 is capable of statically ruling out several classes of errors that would otherwise remain undetected at tactic definition time. We demonstrate the utility of Mtac2’s typed tactics by porting several tactics from a large Coq development, the Iris Proof Mode, from Ltac to Mtac2.

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:76e4c827-24ae-45c5-a57f-f902a6011fd8

https://doi.org/10.1145/3236773

2475-1421

Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 2 (ICFP), 78:1-78:31

Institutional Repository

journal article

© 2018 Jan-Oliver Kaiser, Beta Ziliani, R.J. Krebbers, Yann Régis-Gianas, Derek Dreyer