Searched for: +
(1 - 14 of 14)
document
Koeman, Vincent J. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Gratch, Jonathan (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
Effective use of negotiation support systems depends on the systems capability of explaining itself to the user. This paper introduces the notion of an explanation matrix and an aberration detection mechanism for bidding strategies. The aberration detection is a mechanism that detects if one of the negotiating parties deviates from their...
conference paper 2021
document
Wolter, R.C. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Samur, Dalya (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
The commercial availability of robots and voice-operated smart devices such as Alexa or Google Home have some companies wondering whether they can replace some current human interactions by using these devices. One such area of interaction is at the reception desk. While both platforms can offer the necessary interaction features to take on...
conference paper 2020
document
Koeman, V.J. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Gratch, Jonathan (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
To improve a negotiator's ability to recognise bidding strategies, we pro-actively provide explanations that are based on the opponent's bids and the negotiator's guesses about the opponent's strategy. We introduce an aberration detection mechanism for recognising strategies and the notion of an explanation matrix. The aberration detection...
conference paper 2019
document
Aydogan, R. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
Much attention has been paid to bilateral negotiation in which the dispute is between only two parties. However, automated multilateral negotiation in which more than two negotiating parties need to reach a joint agreement, has received relatively less attention, even though such negotiations are required in many circumstances (e.g. a group of...
conference paper 2013
document
Aydogan, R. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
Much attention has been paid to bilateral negotiation in which the dispute is between only two parties. However, automated multilateral negotiation in which more than two negotiating parties need to reach a joint agreement, has received relatively less attention, even though such negotiations are required in many circumstances (e.g. a group of...
conference paper 2013
document
Visser, W. (author), Aydogan, R. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
conference paper 2012
document
Baarslag, T. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Hendrikx, M.J.C. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
conference paper 2012
document
Visser, W.M. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
In the context of practical reasoning, such as decision making and negotiation, it is necessary to model preferences over possible outcomes. Such preferences usually depend on multiple criteria. We argue that the criteria by which outcomes are evaluated should be the satisfaction of a person’s underlying interests: the more an outcome satisfies...
conference paper 2011
document
Visser, W.M. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
Preferences are derived in part from knowledge. Knowledge, however, may be defeasible. We present an argumentation framework for deriving qualitative, multi-attribute preferences and incorporate defeasible reasoning about knowledge. Intuitively, preferences based on defeasible conclusions are not as strong as preferences based on certain...
conference paper 2011
document
Baarslag, T. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
In every negotiation with a deadline, one of the negotiating parties has to accept an offer to avoid a break off. A break off is usually an undesirable outcome for both parties, therefore it is important that a negotiator employs a proficient mechanism to decide under which conditions to accept. When designing such conditions one is faced with...
conference paper 2011
document
Visser, W.M. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author)
Preferences are derived in part from knowledge. Knowledge, however, may be defeasible. We present an argumentation framework for deriving qualitative, multi-attribute preferences and incorporate defeasible reasoning about knowledge. Intuitively, preferences based on defeasible conclusions are not as strong as preferences based on certain...
conference paper 2011
document
Van Riemsdijk, M.B. (author), Hindriks, K.V. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author), Sierhuis, M. (author)
conference paper 2010
document
Hindriks, K.V. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author), Visser, W. (author)
conference paper 2009
document
Hindriks, K.V. (author), Jonker, C.M. (author), Pasman, W. (author)
Rational agents programmed in agent programming languages derive their choice of action from their beliefs and goals. One of the main benefits of such programming languages is that they facilitate a highlevel and conceptually elegant specification of agent behaviour. Qualitative concepts alone, however, are not sufficient to specify that this...
conference paper 2008
Searched for: +
(1 - 14 of 14)