Searched for: author%3A%22Sand%2C+M.%22
(1 - 20 of 22)

Pages

document
Chiapperino, Luca (author), Sand, M. (author)
book chapter 2024
document
Sand, M. (author)
The present chapter begins by exploring whether the project of a hermeneutic technology assessment (TA) squares well with some of TA's most fundamental presuppositions and commitments including, for instance, to provide assessments that are relevant for policymakers and can guide the shaping of emerging technologies in a responsible manner. If –...
book chapter 2023
document
van de Poel, I.R. (author), Sand, M. (author)
book chapter 2023
document
Jongsma, K.R. (author), Sand, M. (author), Milota, Megan (author)
In the medical literature, promising results regarding accuracy of medical AI are presented as claims for its potential to increase efficiency. This elision of concepts is misleading and incorrect. First, the promise that AI will reduce human workload rests on a too narrow assessment of what constitutes workload in the first place. Human...
journal article 2023
document
Sand, M. (author), Hofbauer, B. (author), Alleblas, J. (author)
After years of missing the agreed upon goals for carbon reduction, we might conclude that global climate policies set infeasible standards to halt climate change. The widespread non-compliance of many signees with frameworks such as the Paris Agreement indicates that these frameworks were too optimistic regarding the signees’ motivation to act....
journal article 2023
document
Sand, M. (author)
Der vorliegende Aufsatz geht zwei Fragen nach: Sind digitale Utopien „echte Utopien“? Und, was ist der Wert solcher Narrative? Diese Fragen sind von besonderer Signifikanz: Anlehnend an klassische Argumente in der politischen Philosophie stehen digitalen Utopien in der Kritik. Wie politische Utopien, die häufig als unrealisierbar gelten, lenkten...
book chapter 2023
document
Sand, M. (author), Chiapperino, Luca (author)
Martin Sand and Luca Chiapperino find in the concept of serendipity a versatile umbrella term to reassess their previous work on moral luck and collective responsibility. Moral luck supposedly occurs when someone receives praise or blame for things beyond control. Given the ubiquity of luck, this seems to be a seriously disquieting aspect of...
book chapter 2023
document
Jongsma, Karin Rolanda (author), Sand, M. (author)
journal article 2022
document
Sand, M. (author)
book chapter 2021
document
Sand, M. (author)
review 2021
document
Sand, M. (author), Klenk, M.B.O.T. (author)
journal article 2021
document
Sand, M. (author), Duran, J.M. (author), Jongsma, Karin Rolanda (author)
Medical AI is increasingly being developed and tested to improve medical diagnosis, prediction and treatment of a wide array of medical conditions. Despite worries about the explainability and accuracy of such medical AI systems, it is reasonable to assume that they will be increasingly implemented in medical practice. Current ethical debates...
journal article 2021
document
Steen, Marc (author), Sand, M. (author), van de Poel, I.R. (author)
Governments and companies are increasingly promoting and organizing Responsible Innovation. It is, however, unclear how the seemingly incompatible demands for responsibility, which is associated with care and caution, can be harmonized with demands for innovation, which is associated with risk-taking and speed. We turn to the tradition of virtue...
journal article 2021
document
Sand, M. (author), Klenk, M.B.O.T. (author)
A prominent view in contemporary philosophy of technology suggests that more technology implies more possibilities and, therefore, more responsibilities. Consequently, the question ‘What technology?’ is discussed primarily on the backdrop of assessing, assigning, and avoiding technology- borne culpability. The view is reminiscent of the Olympian...
book chapter 2020
document
Sand, M. (author)
review 2020
document
Sand, M. (author)
The nexus of the moral luck debate is the control principle, which says that people are responsible only for things within their control. In this paper, I will first argue that the control principle should be restrained to blameworthiness, because responsibility is too wide a concept to square with control. Many deniers of moral luck appeal to...
journal article 2020
document
Sand, M. (author), Copeland, S.M. (author)
From the early days of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), luck has played the role of an antagonist to responsibility: responsible innovation is, in part, an effort to control for the possible negative effects of luck–the chance that chance itself will take our technologies in directions that we would rather avoid. If we are to have...
journal article 2020
document
Sand, M. (author), Jongsma, Karin (author)
Scientific discoveries are often to some degree influenced by luck. Whether luck’s influence is at odds with common-sense intuitions about responsibility, is the central concern of the philosophical debate about moral luck. Do scientists acknowledge that luck plays a role in their work and–if so–do they consider it morally problematic? The...
journal article 2020
document
Sand, M. (author), Bredenoord, Annelien L. (author), Jongsma, Karin R. (author)
The world has been startled by the irresponsible experiment of He Jiankui, who used CRISPR to genetically modify human embryos. In this viewpoint, we explore the phenomenon of moral luck in medicine and its bearing on the limits of simple judgements of the kind “everything that ends well is well” or “someone broke the rules, and is therefore...
review 2019
document
Sand, M. (author)
Given the importance of a hermeneutic extension of Technology Assessment (TA), we should ask which kind of knowledge can be created from such perspective and whether and how such knowledge can be relevant for policymaking. Hermeneutic TA aims at understanding the “meaning attributed to emerging technologies in societal discourses”. In this...
journal article 2019
Searched for: author%3A%22Sand%2C+M.%22
(1 - 20 of 22)

Pages