Airborne wind energy (AWE) harnesses higher-altitude winds using kites to generate renewable electricity. As AWE technologies move closer to potential commercialization, understanding how local communities interact with and are affected by these technologies is crucial for socially responsible deployment. Identifying key predictors of community acceptance can help develop targeted measures to address potential impacts while the technology is still adaptable. This study tested the Integrated Acceptance Model (IAM) on survey data from two European AWE test sites. A linear regression analysis revealed that two of the five explanatory variables significantly predicted acceptance: perceived site impacts (e.g., sound emissions, landscape changes, and aviation lights), as well as developer transparency and fairness in site operations. In contrast, attitudes toward the energy transition, perceived economic impacts, and social norms did not predict acceptance. These findings suggest that while AWE developers prioritize technical challenges, attention must also be given to social factors, such as minimizing impacts and ensuring transparent and fair implementation. The results also have important policy implications, highlighting the need for AWE-specific regulations and socially responsible planning practices. Further research is required to investigate additional acceptance predictors, especially if AWE technologies continue to develop toward commercial applications.

Airborne wind energy (AWE) is an emerging renewable energy technology that uses kites to harvest winds at higher altitudes than wind turbines. Understanding how residents experience a local AWE system (AWES) is important as the technology approaches commercialization. Such knowledge can help adjust the design and deployment of an AWES to fit locals' needs better, thereby decreasing the technology's burden on people. Although the AWE literature claims that the technology affects nature and residents less than wind turbines, empirical evidence has been lacking. This first community acceptance study recruited residents within a 3.5 km radius of an AWE test site in Northern Germany. Using structured questionnaires, 54 residents rated the AWES and the closest wind farm on visual, sound, safety, siting, environmental, and ecological aspects. Contrary to the literature's claims, residents assessed the noise, ecological, and safety impacts similarly for the AWES and the wind farm. Only visual impacts were rated better for the AWES (e.g., no shadows were perceived). Consistent with research on wind turbines, residents who rated the site operation as fairer and the developer as more transparent tended to have more positive attitudes towards the AWES and to experience less noise annoyance. Consequently, recommendations for the AWE industry and policymakers include mitigating technology impacts and implementing evidence-based strategies to ensure just and effective project development. The findings are limited to one specific AWES using soft-wing kites. Future research should assess community responses across regions and different types of AWESs to test the findings' generalizability.