DP
D.A. Pankotai
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
2 records found
1
Rooms in Sequence
On Backs Becoming Fronts where Collective Living and Making is Happening Side by Side
“A plan is a society of rooms.” -Louis Kahn.
Rooms in Sequence echoes this. The Heyvaert quarter, located west of Brussels’ canal, is a dense, multi-ethnic neighbourhood, a city of arrival, shaped by informal trade, industrial heritage, and a buried river. Its urban blocks are deep. Behind the street façades lie unclaimed interiors: forgotten courtyards, unseen rear walls, spaces too small to build on but too large to belong to anyone.
The site sits enclosed within one of these blocks, embedded like a puzzle piece.
Three buildings and a series of awkward in-between gardens, separating the
structures from one another, overlooked, underloved. This is where the project
begins. Through demolishing, reorganising and renovating, this project explores
how hidden backspaces can be claimed and transformed — not only for those
who live there, but as a way of rethinking the urban fabric itself.
Turning inward, this project creates a microcosm where backs become fronts
and working and living happen side by side. Inspired by K. F. Schinkel’s CourtGardener’s House, old courtyard typologies and the spatial logic of monasteries, the buildings enclose a sequence of gardens that each act as a room: a room for working and making, a room for playing, a room for gathering and socialising, a room for quiet and intimate conversations. These spaces guide the people who move through them. The project is focused inward, but what it creates is not only for its residents. It is for the neighbourhood too.
Fifty residents live here collectively. The floor plan is designed to make people
meet and linger while protecting the privacy of each individual unit. The Art
Deco imprint of the existing building is preserved and considered: rear façades
suddenly become visible, and turn into main ones. New relationships, new
accesses, new perspectives, each facade treated as a front. The adjacent
industrial building gives space to an atelier, where craftsmen work and take on
apprentices, offering accessible education in a neighbourhood that receives
people from everywhere. A café and bike repair sit alongside, tying the productive
and the everyday together.
A society of rooms — for living, for working, for the city. ...
Rooms in Sequence echoes this. The Heyvaert quarter, located west of Brussels’ canal, is a dense, multi-ethnic neighbourhood, a city of arrival, shaped by informal trade, industrial heritage, and a buried river. Its urban blocks are deep. Behind the street façades lie unclaimed interiors: forgotten courtyards, unseen rear walls, spaces too small to build on but too large to belong to anyone.
The site sits enclosed within one of these blocks, embedded like a puzzle piece.
Three buildings and a series of awkward in-between gardens, separating the
structures from one another, overlooked, underloved. This is where the project
begins. Through demolishing, reorganising and renovating, this project explores
how hidden backspaces can be claimed and transformed — not only for those
who live there, but as a way of rethinking the urban fabric itself.
Turning inward, this project creates a microcosm where backs become fronts
and working and living happen side by side. Inspired by K. F. Schinkel’s CourtGardener’s House, old courtyard typologies and the spatial logic of monasteries, the buildings enclose a sequence of gardens that each act as a room: a room for working and making, a room for playing, a room for gathering and socialising, a room for quiet and intimate conversations. These spaces guide the people who move through them. The project is focused inward, but what it creates is not only for its residents. It is for the neighbourhood too.
Fifty residents live here collectively. The floor plan is designed to make people
meet and linger while protecting the privacy of each individual unit. The Art
Deco imprint of the existing building is preserved and considered: rear façades
suddenly become visible, and turn into main ones. New relationships, new
accesses, new perspectives, each facade treated as a front. The adjacent
industrial building gives space to an atelier, where craftsmen work and take on
apprentices, offering accessible education in a neighbourhood that receives
people from everywhere. A café and bike repair sit alongside, tying the productive
and the everyday together.
A society of rooms — for living, for working, for the city. ...
“A plan is a society of rooms.” -Louis Kahn.
Rooms in Sequence echoes this. The Heyvaert quarter, located west of Brussels’ canal, is a dense, multi-ethnic neighbourhood, a city of arrival, shaped by informal trade, industrial heritage, and a buried river. Its urban blocks are deep. Behind the street façades lie unclaimed interiors: forgotten courtyards, unseen rear walls, spaces too small to build on but too large to belong to anyone.
The site sits enclosed within one of these blocks, embedded like a puzzle piece.
Three buildings and a series of awkward in-between gardens, separating the
structures from one another, overlooked, underloved. This is where the project
begins. Through demolishing, reorganising and renovating, this project explores
how hidden backspaces can be claimed and transformed — not only for those
who live there, but as a way of rethinking the urban fabric itself.
Turning inward, this project creates a microcosm where backs become fronts
and working and living happen side by side. Inspired by K. F. Schinkel’s CourtGardener’s House, old courtyard typologies and the spatial logic of monasteries, the buildings enclose a sequence of gardens that each act as a room: a room for working and making, a room for playing, a room for gathering and socialising, a room for quiet and intimate conversations. These spaces guide the people who move through them. The project is focused inward, but what it creates is not only for its residents. It is for the neighbourhood too.
Fifty residents live here collectively. The floor plan is designed to make people
meet and linger while protecting the privacy of each individual unit. The Art
Deco imprint of the existing building is preserved and considered: rear façades
suddenly become visible, and turn into main ones. New relationships, new
accesses, new perspectives, each facade treated as a front. The adjacent
industrial building gives space to an atelier, where craftsmen work and take on
apprentices, offering accessible education in a neighbourhood that receives
people from everywhere. A café and bike repair sit alongside, tying the productive
and the everyday together.
A society of rooms — for living, for working, for the city.
Rooms in Sequence echoes this. The Heyvaert quarter, located west of Brussels’ canal, is a dense, multi-ethnic neighbourhood, a city of arrival, shaped by informal trade, industrial heritage, and a buried river. Its urban blocks are deep. Behind the street façades lie unclaimed interiors: forgotten courtyards, unseen rear walls, spaces too small to build on but too large to belong to anyone.
The site sits enclosed within one of these blocks, embedded like a puzzle piece.
Three buildings and a series of awkward in-between gardens, separating the
structures from one another, overlooked, underloved. This is where the project
begins. Through demolishing, reorganising and renovating, this project explores
how hidden backspaces can be claimed and transformed — not only for those
who live there, but as a way of rethinking the urban fabric itself.
Turning inward, this project creates a microcosm where backs become fronts
and working and living happen side by side. Inspired by K. F. Schinkel’s CourtGardener’s House, old courtyard typologies and the spatial logic of monasteries, the buildings enclose a sequence of gardens that each act as a room: a room for working and making, a room for playing, a room for gathering and socialising, a room for quiet and intimate conversations. These spaces guide the people who move through them. The project is focused inward, but what it creates is not only for its residents. It is for the neighbourhood too.
Fifty residents live here collectively. The floor plan is designed to make people
meet and linger while protecting the privacy of each individual unit. The Art
Deco imprint of the existing building is preserved and considered: rear façades
suddenly become visible, and turn into main ones. New relationships, new
accesses, new perspectives, each facade treated as a front. The adjacent
industrial building gives space to an atelier, where craftsmen work and take on
apprentices, offering accessible education in a neighbourhood that receives
people from everywhere. A café and bike repair sit alongside, tying the productive
and the everyday together.
A society of rooms — for living, for working, for the city.
Scripted Space, Lived Reality
Architecture and Ideology in the József Attila Housing Estate
This thesis examines the relationship between architecture, ideology, and lived experience through the case study of the József Attila Housing Estate in Budapest, Hungary. The research focuses on whether architecture can truly shape thought and behaviour, or lived experience ultimately redefines the space. Built just after the Second World War, the estate is an excellent case study as it represents core socialist values. Equality, collectivism, and uniformity were the new driving forces of everyday life. This estate features prefabricated panel buildings surrounded by communal outdoor spaces, all made to foster an ideal socialist community. However, reality was far more different. An analysis of three different building scales —building, urban, and social —reveals the gaps between planned design and everyday reality. This research relies on archival materials, site visits, photographs, and oral interviews to make its case. There is a consistent misalignment between the designer's intention and the actual use of spaces by their inhabitants, as the analysis reveals. Designated communal spaces often remained underused, while informal, intimate spaces like the stairwell or the front of the house became spaces of interaction. These contradictions reveal that architecture is not fully capable of controlling its users; it can only set the scene. Residents adapted and reimagined their spaces. Rather than seeing the estate only as a failed utopia, this thesis argues for a more complex and deeper point of view. This paper challenges the architectural canon's neglect of ordinary housing by recognising both the limitations of planning and the different ways in which people have shaped daily life. It argues that spaces like the József Attila Estate are essential to understanding how architecture is truly lived, not just designed.
...
...
This thesis examines the relationship between architecture, ideology, and lived experience through the case study of the József Attila Housing Estate in Budapest, Hungary. The research focuses on whether architecture can truly shape thought and behaviour, or lived experience ultimately redefines the space. Built just after the Second World War, the estate is an excellent case study as it represents core socialist values. Equality, collectivism, and uniformity were the new driving forces of everyday life. This estate features prefabricated panel buildings surrounded by communal outdoor spaces, all made to foster an ideal socialist community. However, reality was far more different. An analysis of three different building scales —building, urban, and social —reveals the gaps between planned design and everyday reality. This research relies on archival materials, site visits, photographs, and oral interviews to make its case. There is a consistent misalignment between the designer's intention and the actual use of spaces by their inhabitants, as the analysis reveals. Designated communal spaces often remained underused, while informal, intimate spaces like the stairwell or the front of the house became spaces of interaction. These contradictions reveal that architecture is not fully capable of controlling its users; it can only set the scene. Residents adapted and reimagined their spaces. Rather than seeing the estate only as a failed utopia, this thesis argues for a more complex and deeper point of view. This paper challenges the architectural canon's neglect of ordinary housing by recognising both the limitations of planning and the different ways in which people have shaped daily life. It argues that spaces like the József Attila Estate are essential to understanding how architecture is truly lived, not just designed.