Due to international commitments to reduce emissions in the shipping sector, new fuels and drivetrains are being explored. However, the potential role of batteries is often overlooked in strategic studies. We fill this gap through a broad literature study of grey and academic literature, complemented with three deep dives into Systems Engineering, Sustainable Business Models, and Transition approaches. Battery electric systems are currently the most frequently applied among alternative fuel-drivetrains, although they account for a low percentage of energy use. They are the preferred technology for zero-emission vessels. However, they mostly find application in small to medium hybrid vessels and support functions. Key drivers are regulation and policies, the increase in energy density, and the decrease in costs. Sectoral barriers include infrastructure, the capital intensity of vessels, cost-driven performance, weak governance, and international operations. Challenges for battery applications include integration in a ship's energy system, battery safety, charging, decision support on feasible applications, and establishing viable renewables-based port energy communities that integrate services to and from battery systems on berthing ships. Due to their diversity, versatility, and current application, batteries are likely to become more broadly applied on small to medium-sized vessels, and as enabling technology in hybrid applications and support functions. They thereby have the potential to influence the transition in the sector. Considering the diversity in batteries, shipping segments, and contexts, this will result in many small steps forward. Fast development requires strong policy support. Inherent uncertainty regarding fuels and drivetrains is best countered by robust decision-making in the sector, and can include battery usage.

Hybrid power systems are increasingly adopted onboard. Lithium-ion batteries now serve as a viable energy storage solution that enhances fuel efficiency and reduces the operating hours of main power units, thereby reducing operational expenses. However, integrating batteries onboard requires decision-making that accounts for diverse scenarios, including battery chemistry, variations in vessel operational profiles, and fluctuating fuel prices. To address these challenges, this study investigates whether battery sizing and scheduling of the power and energy management system require a scenario-based stochastic decision framework. Specifically, it examines how energy storage requirements are influenced by varying load profiles, whether the optimal battery size and power management strategy are affected by fuel price fluctuations, and how robust the overall strategy remains under operational uncertainties. A deterministic equivalent of a two-stage stochastic decision framework is introduced to incorporate these uncertainties, offering insights into the required battery technology, capacity, and correlated behavior of onboard energy management. Multiple scenarios are applied to a trailing suction hopper dredger, analyzing three load profiles with distinct variations in power demand. With reserve power constraints enforced, the optimal battery capacity remains fixed. However, when these constraints are relaxed, the optimal battery size becomes more sensitive to fuel price changes. In addition, the results showcase reduction in diesel engine operating hours—thereby lowering both fuel consumption and maintenance costs, demonstrating that these operational benefits depend not only on the battery's size but also on its available throughput, which allows for deeper cycling.

Batteries have emerged as a promising solution across diverse vessel segments, offering benefits in operational efficiency, cost reduction, and emissions reduction. This study investigates the specific requirements of batteries onboard 7 vessel types, such as tugboats, ferries, cruise ships, yachts, fishing vessel, vessels with cranes, and dynamic positioning vessels, through an in-depth analysis of load profiles and operational needs. By identifying 24 potential operational requirements, ranging from battery electric operation to silent operations and load smoothing, a mixed-integer linear programming model is used to optimize the power and energy allocation for each requirement. This framework enables a generalization of battery requirements for various vessel segments and enables the assessment of three lithium-ion battery chemistries: Lithium Iron Phosphate, Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide, and Lithium Titanate Oxide. The results indicate that different vessel types prioritize either high energy density batteries or those capable of delivering high power relative to energy capacity. To guide battery selection, a decision tree is presented that matches battery types with specific vessel needs. Lithium Titanate Oxide batteries are well-suited for applications requiring frequent, high power cycles, especially where fast charging is needed. Lithium Iron Phosphate batteries are best for energy-intensive operations, while Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide batteries perform well in both high power and high energy applications. This study offers a practical approach, an inventory of battery requirements, and guidance on selecting the chemistries best suited to various vessel types and operational needs.

Fuel cell-battery electric drivetrains are attractive alternatives to reduce the shipping emissions. This research focuses on emission-free cargo vessels and provides insight on the design, lifetime operation and costs of hydrogen-hybrid systems, which require further research for increased utilization. A representative round trip is created by analysing one-year operational data, based on load ramps and power frequency. A low-pass filter controller is employed for power distribution. For the lifetime cost analysis, 14 scenarios with varying capital and operational expenses were considered. The Net Present Value of the retrofitted fuel cell-battery propulsion system can be up to $ 2.2 million lower or up to $ 18.8 million higher than the original diesel mechanical configuration, highly dependent on the costs of green hydrogen and carbon taxes. The main propulsion system weights and volumes of the two versions are comparable, but the hydrogen tank (68 tons, 193 m³) poses significant design and safety challenges.