Fibre Metal Laminates (FMLs) have been widely utilised in aircraft structures for their specific strength, durability and damage tolerance. Most aircraft structures, due to their size, require joining, and FMLs allow for a special type of joint called the splice, a unique but a lesser known joint.

The bulk of research into the splice joint has been conducted in the early 2000s for the A380 program, where a specific type of splice has been implemented, the overlap splice. While it is a proven design, it was expected that other splice designs could be as good if not better than the overlap splice. Further, the pre-existing design guidelines on the splices were not suited for detailed design that would target specific mechanical strengths of the joint, like durability and
damage tolerance. Therefore, this research focused on design iterations of the two splice types, the butt splice and the overlap splice, that would provide insights into splice design guidelines against fatigue and demonstrate which splice configuration is a superior joint. An extension
of this research focuses on identification of location and lifetime to damage initiation within the splice using analytical numerical methods, which was previously done on uninterrupted FMLs, but not on spliced FMLs.

Research comprises of a multi-disciplinary approach, combining Finite Element Method (FEM), numerical predictive modelling and experimental investigations that then also doubled as means of validation of the models built. Design iterations were based on the influence that the parameters, labeled a through e, within the splice joint have on the overall stress field within the joint and how that affects the joint’s fatigue life to damage initiation, Ni, a fatigue
performance indicator of the study. It has been discovered that changing the tolerances within the splices provides little influence on the stress field within the splice, which resulted in several iterations of the splice design approaching smaller and more lightweight joint alterations. The designs showed excellent durability characteristics when compared to the Limit of Validity (LOV) cycles set by the aviation authorities, such as EASA and FAA. The Finite Element (FE) model was able to accurately depict the stress field within the splice, validated by the experimental data through strain fields captured using Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technique, and consequently accurately pointed to the location of damage initiation, which in all cases was the outer-most overlap on the flush side of the joint. Along with the adapted predictive numerical model it was possible to predict the damage initiation lives in the spliced specimens with a blunt notch. The predictions in the samples without the notch resulted in far lesser agreement with experiments. This was likely caused by to the limitations of the model, which only took into account quasi-static loading without damage and is highly dependent on the reference data used.

It was concluded that splices can be designed smaller and lighter than previously done due to the tighter tolerances allowed within the splice. Overlaps of 5 mm in both the unnotched butt splice and the unnotched overlap splice, however, resulted in an alternative damage progression mode, specifically a complete delamination of the external overlap rather than metal fatigue cracking. This is attributed to the rising average shear stress in the adhesive. Regardless, the smallest and lightest iterations of the butt splice and the overlap splice with
5 mm overlaps and gaps between aluminium interruptions showed excellent durability and the design iterations were found to affect the damage initiation life very little, considering that fatigue damage initiation is a subject to scatter. It is hard to draw a concrete conclusion on the damage tolerance of the updated designs due to alternative damage modes and lack of research thereof. While both splice types were deemed to be successful in their role of a joining structure, the butt splice was concluded to be superior to the overlap splice when it came to fatigue performance, consistently developing visible damage later than the overlap splice. This gap in fatigue performance is expected to expand if thicker layers or larger number of layers are to be considered. This is because of the secondary bending which occurred in the joint, more so for the overlap splice than the butt splice judging from FEA results and experiments.

It is recommended that a more extensive FE model is developed using the model built in this research as a foundation. The current model could be expanded in several ways, such as simulations of damage progression, individual modelling of the fibre layers, fibre failure models, and a curing simulation. This will improve the validity of the methodology, specifically concerning the unnotched splice specimens, and improve the predictions of not only initiation lives, but also failure lives.