B. Gremmen
Please Note
17 records found
1
The Baudartius Centre for Visual Arts
A New Entrance to Zutphen
Fenix II is the witness of Rotterdam active industrial harbour transformation over time.
Who is Fenix II?
She represents the growth of Rotterdam industrial harbor.
She was once the longest warehouse in Europe.
She shows the modernity of applying cutting edge building technology by using reinforced concrete.
She is a strong survivor from both WWII and on-site fire damage.
Fenix II states important valuable layers: historical, cultural, technical, non-intentional commemorative, and rarity aspects. Even though Fenix II is not yet listed on Rotterdam municipality monuments, the characters and facts found in the building prove the importance of Fenix II.
Fenix II, she continues her journey to the new phase of Rotterdam industrial harbor.
Rotterdam harbor once hosted vibrant industrial activities. However, these activities have been shifted away from current city context. Circular economy can be seen as a new phase of industrial activity and bring back the liveliness of production atmosphere. The current programs as Tropicana and RTM Campus in Rotterdam establish a good foundation of circular economy topic. However, the network is not completed. Fexix II has great potential due to its location and the nature of the building quality to enhance this urban network.
The starting point of the project is entirety and continuity, emphasizing the transformation phases and the historical layers of the building.
Fenix II consists of 3 parts: Central Green, exhibition, and research labs along with workshops. Central Green creates the new identity of the building as the main entrance to gather all activities inside; the most visible interventions can be seen here, entirely open and double height ceiling showing the existing traces along with the newly adding layers. On one side of Fenix II reflects on the great attention of historical layers: exhibition space of Fenix II and Rotterdam industrial harbor, and also current urban issues. On the other side of the building addresses the emerging topic as circular economy network: research labs, harvest hubs, and explore labs. Moreover, the green way, buffer zone, is introduced and plays an important role of the project, in order to preserve high existing values of Fenix II and at the same time to achieve high building performance. The green way is integrated with natural elements as plants and water, not only functioning to control intake air temperature and humidity with minimal energy consumption, but also form a semi-outdoor space for temporary exhibition and resting points.
In order to emphasize the historical layers that San Francisco warehouse was once an entirety, light poles have been designed in Light Plaza, indicating the original structure location, as well as along the north façade where one span was taken out due to the fire damage. With minimal architectural elements, this intervention shows the reconnection of Fenix I and Fenix II and creates a new phase of continuation.
...
Fenix II is the witness of Rotterdam active industrial harbour transformation over time.
Who is Fenix II?
She represents the growth of Rotterdam industrial harbor.
She was once the longest warehouse in Europe.
She shows the modernity of applying cutting edge building technology by using reinforced concrete.
She is a strong survivor from both WWII and on-site fire damage.
Fenix II states important valuable layers: historical, cultural, technical, non-intentional commemorative, and rarity aspects. Even though Fenix II is not yet listed on Rotterdam municipality monuments, the characters and facts found in the building prove the importance of Fenix II.
Fenix II, she continues her journey to the new phase of Rotterdam industrial harbor.
Rotterdam harbor once hosted vibrant industrial activities. However, these activities have been shifted away from current city context. Circular economy can be seen as a new phase of industrial activity and bring back the liveliness of production atmosphere. The current programs as Tropicana and RTM Campus in Rotterdam establish a good foundation of circular economy topic. However, the network is not completed. Fexix II has great potential due to its location and the nature of the building quality to enhance this urban network.
The starting point of the project is entirety and continuity, emphasizing the transformation phases and the historical layers of the building.
Fenix II consists of 3 parts: Central Green, exhibition, and research labs along with workshops. Central Green creates the new identity of the building as the main entrance to gather all activities inside; the most visible interventions can be seen here, entirely open and double height ceiling showing the existing traces along with the newly adding layers. On one side of Fenix II reflects on the great attention of historical layers: exhibition space of Fenix II and Rotterdam industrial harbor, and also current urban issues. On the other side of the building addresses the emerging topic as circular economy network: research labs, harvest hubs, and explore labs. Moreover, the green way, buffer zone, is introduced and plays an important role of the project, in order to preserve high existing values of Fenix II and at the same time to achieve high building performance. The green way is integrated with natural elements as plants and water, not only functioning to control intake air temperature and humidity with minimal energy consumption, but also form a semi-outdoor space for temporary exhibition and resting points.
In order to emphasize the historical layers that San Francisco warehouse was once an entirety, light poles have been designed in Light Plaza, indicating the original structure location, as well as along the north façade where one span was taken out due to the fire damage. With minimal architectural elements, this intervention shows the reconnection of Fenix I and Fenix II and creates a new phase of continuation.
Innoveem
Continuing Katoenveem - moving towards making innovation
Nowadays the harbour of Rotterdam still exists, although its manifestation is shifting. The harbour industry moves away and the Merwe Vierhaven area where ‘Katoenveem’ is situated starts breathing the atmosphere of a ‘Makerscity’. Research, innovation and design are key. These developments in the close surrounding of the ‘Rotterdam Harbour Heritage’ are incorporated as opportunity to activate 'Katoenveem'. Investigation of the activity, during both historic setting and present situation leads as transformation strategy to continuation of 'Katoenveem' - ‘Innoveem’.
It becomes a multicrafting center through the combination of different disciplines of crafting processes. Thus contributing to making innovation, the interplay between constant making and reflection is hosted. Developments will be embraced by the achieved flexibility within the repetitive monumental architecture and functional purpose. With 'Innoveem' we are moving towards making innovation.
...
Nowadays the harbour of Rotterdam still exists, although its manifestation is shifting. The harbour industry moves away and the Merwe Vierhaven area where ‘Katoenveem’ is situated starts breathing the atmosphere of a ‘Makerscity’. Research, innovation and design are key. These developments in the close surrounding of the ‘Rotterdam Harbour Heritage’ are incorporated as opportunity to activate 'Katoenveem'. Investigation of the activity, during both historic setting and present situation leads as transformation strategy to continuation of 'Katoenveem' - ‘Innoveem’.
It becomes a multicrafting center through the combination of different disciplines of crafting processes. Thus contributing to making innovation, the interplay between constant making and reflection is hosted. Developments will be embraced by the achieved flexibility within the repetitive monumental architecture and functional purpose. With 'Innoveem' we are moving towards making innovation.
SANTOS House of Jazz
A proposal to re-design the abandoned Santos warehouse in Rotterdam and turn it into a House of Jazz
Today, the Belvedere does not function as a Jazz club any more, but houses a restaurant and space for events. This nostalgic revelation turns Santos into the new heart of Jazz in Katendrecht and revives a piece of history that is currently not commemorated. It poses a great opportunity to bring back something to the community that was taken away from it - a place of togetherness and collective culture as the Belvedere Verhalenhuis embodied exactly that during WWII. ...
Today, the Belvedere does not function as a Jazz club any more, but houses a restaurant and space for events. This nostalgic revelation turns Santos into the new heart of Jazz in Katendrecht and revives a piece of history that is currently not commemorated. It poses a great opportunity to bring back something to the community that was taken away from it - a place of togetherness and collective culture as the Belvedere Verhalenhuis embodied exactly that during WWII.
Maassilo Rotterdam
A study place for experimentation
As a new program for the redesign of the Maassilo, a similar function as the current occupancy is chosen: a night club. The night club, as a very volatile function with a life span of mostly five to ten years stands in sharp contrast to the Maassilo, a nearly indestructable structure that has existed for more than a hundred years. However, when still in use as a grain silo, the Maassilo has always been part of a very dynamic environment. The questions arises if the Maassilo could provide a structural place for a new dynamic.
This thesis explores questions about informality, temporary/permanent design, spatial expression, controlled demolition and acoustics. ...
As a new program for the redesign of the Maassilo, a similar function as the current occupancy is chosen: a night club. The night club, as a very volatile function with a life span of mostly five to ten years stands in sharp contrast to the Maassilo, a nearly indestructable structure that has existed for more than a hundred years. However, when still in use as a grain silo, the Maassilo has always been part of a very dynamic environment. The questions arises if the Maassilo could provide a structural place for a new dynamic.
This thesis explores questions about informality, temporary/permanent design, spatial expression, controlled demolition and acoustics.
St. Elisabeth Heritage Garden
Refurbish of St. Elisabeth complex
Is cultural property justified by means of private use?
Heritages are a national asset. Everyone has the right to learn history through heritage. Therefore, when the circumstances allow it, heritage must be shared in public. The historical elements in this complex can provide great future opportunities to Nieuwstad. In this project, I suggest a ‘Heritage garden’ as a cultural hub of the Nieuwstad.
...
Is cultural property justified by means of private use?
Heritages are a national asset. Everyone has the right to learn history through heritage. Therefore, when the circumstances allow it, heritage must be shared in public. The historical elements in this complex can provide great future opportunities to Nieuwstad. In this project, I suggest a ‘Heritage garden’ as a cultural hub of the Nieuwstad.
Global-Local Symbiosis
Urban Liver For Electronic Waste in Hong Kong
The Dutch West Caribbean Company
A Global Company
The offshore world has been gaining enormous popularity since the 1980’s and despite increasingly defining the operations of the globalized economy and the spaces it generates, it is a spatial phenomenon that is mostly ignored by the architectural and urban discourse. Manifested by the forms of tax havens, freeports and special economic zones, the offshore world offers an exterritorial space where people, objects, and capital can operate beyond the burdens of national sovereignty, and remain in an unregulated limbo, in theory, forever. ...
The offshore world has been gaining enormous popularity since the 1980’s and despite increasingly defining the operations of the globalized economy and the spaces it generates, it is a spatial phenomenon that is mostly ignored by the architectural and urban discourse. Manifested by the forms of tax havens, freeports and special economic zones, the offshore world offers an exterritorial space where people, objects, and capital can operate beyond the burdens of national sovereignty, and remain in an unregulated limbo, in theory, forever.
Ecologies of Migration
Metabolic landscapes and relational architectures
Arguably, a narrowing vision, which simultaneously claims to capture and organize an otherwise complex and messy reality, is a necessary and effective frame to focus on particular forms of knowledge over and against others. Nevertheless, as is increasingly evident, such narrow frames not only simplify, but also reduce reality, offering static, fixed and schematic falsifications of it, removed as it were, from the actual phenomena to which they allude. Human migration is especially prone to the effects of such simplification, leading to a reduced understanding of the migration phenomenon itself, the multiple agents which emerge from it and that shape it, and their relationality as constitutive of a milieu, or metabolism. For migration, this has a paralyzing effect, as it limits and compartamentalizes the capacity to act in relation to it.
Other discursive schemes (of subject formation) that allow us to think and act differently, creatively and critically in relation to migration are paramount, especially if the intentionality is to physically intervene within it. In other words, migration and migrant agents, when liberated from the grasp of conventionally reductive and simplifying frames, reveal their intricate participation in an ecology that not only engenders the becoming of form, space, matter and subjectivity, but which also shapes specifically human practices and relations. In short, understanding migration as a complex assemblage driven by desire and other, previously unseen forces is to regard it as a process of becoming. Seen from this angle, concepts conventionally associated to human migration –from migrating subjects, territories, borders, to structures and systems-, become fields of latent potentiality and productive possibilities. It is at this juncture when –perhaps appropriately so- we may begin exercising different forms of nomadic thought when dealing with migration.
The proposal departs from the premise that different theoretical and discursive frameworks are necessary to rethink and act upon the very urgent problem of human migration from a metabolic, relational and systemic point of view. It will do so by introducing and explaining an unconventional approach in which three different ‘logics’ will encounter each other in an attempt to recalibrate the reach of the spatial disciplines and material practices, in particular architecture, within the phenomenon of contemporary human migration: population thinking, intensive thinking and topological thinking. ...
Arguably, a narrowing vision, which simultaneously claims to capture and organize an otherwise complex and messy reality, is a necessary and effective frame to focus on particular forms of knowledge over and against others. Nevertheless, as is increasingly evident, such narrow frames not only simplify, but also reduce reality, offering static, fixed and schematic falsifications of it, removed as it were, from the actual phenomena to which they allude. Human migration is especially prone to the effects of such simplification, leading to a reduced understanding of the migration phenomenon itself, the multiple agents which emerge from it and that shape it, and their relationality as constitutive of a milieu, or metabolism. For migration, this has a paralyzing effect, as it limits and compartamentalizes the capacity to act in relation to it.
Other discursive schemes (of subject formation) that allow us to think and act differently, creatively and critically in relation to migration are paramount, especially if the intentionality is to physically intervene within it. In other words, migration and migrant agents, when liberated from the grasp of conventionally reductive and simplifying frames, reveal their intricate participation in an ecology that not only engenders the becoming of form, space, matter and subjectivity, but which also shapes specifically human practices and relations. In short, understanding migration as a complex assemblage driven by desire and other, previously unseen forces is to regard it as a process of becoming. Seen from this angle, concepts conventionally associated to human migration –from migrating subjects, territories, borders, to structures and systems-, become fields of latent potentiality and productive possibilities. It is at this juncture when –perhaps appropriately so- we may begin exercising different forms of nomadic thought when dealing with migration.
The proposal departs from the premise that different theoretical and discursive frameworks are necessary to rethink and act upon the very urgent problem of human migration from a metabolic, relational and systemic point of view. It will do so by introducing and explaining an unconventional approach in which three different ‘logics’ will encounter each other in an attempt to recalibrate the reach of the spatial disciplines and material practices, in particular architecture, within the phenomenon of contemporary human migration: population thinking, intensive thinking and topological thinking.