We critically review the derivation of closed-form analytical expressions for elastic displacements, strains, and stresses inside a subsurface reservoir undergoing pore pressure changes using inclusion theory. Although developed decades ago, inclusion theory has been used recently by various authors to obtain fast estimates of depletion-induced and injection-induced fault stresses in relation to induced seismicity. We therefore briefly address the current geomechanical relevance of this method, and provide a numerical example to demonstrate its use to compute induced fault stresses. However, the main goal of our paper is to correct some erroneous assumptions that were made in earlier publications. While the final expressions for the poroelastic stresses in these publications were correct, their derivation contained conceptual mistakes due to the mathematical subtleties that arise because of singularities in the Green's functions. The aim of our paper is therefore to present the correct derivation of expressions for the strains and stresses inside an inclusion and to clarify some of the results of the aforementioned studies. Furthermore, we present two conditions that the strain field must satisfy, which can be used to verify the analytical expressions.

We consider steady-state single-phase confined flow through a subsurface porous layer containing a displaced, fully conductive fault causing a sudden jump in the flow path, and we employ (semi-)analytical techniques to compute the corresponding pressures and fault stresses. In particular, we obtain a new solution for the pressure field with the aid of conformal mapping and a Schwarz–Christoffel transformation. Moreover, we use an existing technique to compute the poro-elastic stress field with the aid of inclusion theory. The additional resistance to fluid flow provided by a displaced fault, relative to the resistance in a layer without a fault, is a function of dip angle, fault throw divided by reservoir height, and reservoir width divided by reservoir height. Fluid flow has a larger effect on fault stresses in case of injection than in case of depletion, where injection with up-dip flow results in increased zones of fault slip near the bottom of the reservoir. Opposedly, injection with down-dip flow results in increased slip near the top of the reservoir. An order-of-magnitude estimate of the effect of steady-state flow across displaced faults in the Groningen natural gas reservoir shows that the effect on fault stresses is probably negligible. A similar estimate of the effect in low-enthalpy geothermal doublets indicates that steady-state flow may possibly play a small role, in particular close to the injector, but site-specific assessments will be necessary to quantify the effect.