Establishing a permanent lunar base has gained increasing attention since it offers opportunities for international cooperation and the commercialization of space, forming the foundation and testing ground for a human existence independent from Earth. Essential to future missions beyond cislunar space is the exploration and in situ processing of the Moon's resources, especially the sustainable production of energetic resources and propellants. Utilizing in situ generated propellants can dramatically reduce transportation costs by removing the need to source propellants from Earth. Resources on the Moon are limited, and the extraction of available resources are energy-intensive processes demanding advanced techniques and technologies. Consequently, one of the biggest challenges lies in developing process architectures with a positive energy balance, for which comprehensive analyses are still missing. The focus currently lies on the extraction of water ice from lunar regolith and the production of hydrogen and oxygen through water electrolysis. However, alternative fuel and process options may reduce the energy cost while providing equivalent energetic revenue. In the scope of this research, the infrastructure and technologies required for extraction, refining, and storing are assumed to exist in cislunar space; therefore, only the operating cost is considered. Exergy analyses of in situ extraction methods are conducted to investigate whether the required energetic budget allows sustainable implementation. The analysis includes extraction methods and propellant options to reveal the extent to which alternatives to hydrogen are feasible. Exergy analyses determine thermodynamic losses of energy flows giving the ground for process optimization. The exergy destructed represents the margin of improvement within the process architecture and thus reflects the process's thermodynamic and economic value while allowing a more distinct examination of energy use. Assuming the availability of water and carbon dioxide ice in permanently shadowed regions, the analysis shows that choosing methane instead of hydrogen in combination with oxygen as propellants can reduce the required exergy input by up to a third. An example mission allows to directly compare the operating cost of the extraction processes for the different propellant options. The mission entails a spacecraft propelled by a liquid bipropellant engine utilizing the extracted propellant and transporting a payload of the same propellant to a depot located in lunar near-rectilinear halo orbit (NRHO). Although abundant in space, the results suggest that hydrogen may not be the only or even energetically cost-effective resource for developing cislunar and Martian space infrastructures. Likewise, sustainable extraction of propellants suitable for current and future propulsion systems will foster humanity's reach further into the solar system.@en

Surfactant-alternating-gas (SAG) is often the injection method for foam enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in order to improve injectivity. However, liquid injectivity can be very poor once foam is created in the near-wellbore region. In a previous study, we reported core-flood experiments on liquid injectivity after foam flooding and liquid injectivity after a period of gas injection following foam. Results showed the importance of the gas slug to subsequent liquid injectivity. However, the effects of multiple gas and liquid slugs were not explored. In this paper, we present a coreflood study of injectivities of multiple gas and liquid slugs in a SAG process. We inject nitrogen foam, gas and surfactant solution into a sandstone core sample. The experiments are conducted at a temperature of 90°C with 40-bar back pressure. Pressure differences are measured to quantify the injectivity and supplemented with CT scans to relate water saturation to mobility. We find that during prolonged gas injection in the first gas slug following foam, a collapsed-foam region forms near the inlet due to the interplay of evaporation, capillary pressure and pressure-driven flow. This region slowly propagates downstream. During subsequent liquid injection, liquid mobility is much greater in the collapsed-foam region than downstream, and liquid sweeps the entire core cross section there rather than a single finger. In the region beyond the collapsed-foam region, liquid fingers through foam. Liquid flow converges from the entire cross section to the finger through the region of trapped gas. During injection of the second gas slug, the liquid finger disappears quickly as gas flows in, and strong foam forms from the very beginning. A collapsed-foam region then forms near the inlet and slowly propagates downstream with a propagation velocity and mobility similar to that in the first gas slug. Behavior of the second liquid slug is likewise similar to that of the first liquid slug. Our results suggest that, in radial flow, the small region of foam collapse very near the well is crucial to injectivity because of its high mobility. The subsequent gas and liquid slugs behave like the first slugs. The behavior of the first gas slug and subsequent liquid slug is thus representative of near-well behavior in a SAG process.@en

Since the 1980s experimental and field studies have found anomalously slow propagation of foam that cannot be explained by surfactant adsorption. Friedmann et al. (1994) conducted foam-propagation experiments in a coneshaped sandpack and concluded that foam, once formed in the narrow inlet, was unable to propagate at all at lower superficial velocities towards the wider outlet. They hence concluded that long-distance foam propagation in radial flow from an injection well is in doubt. Ashoori et al. (2012) provide a theoretical explanation for slower or non-propagation of foam at decreasing superficial velocity. Their explanation connects foam propagation to the minimum velocity or pressure gradient required for foam generation in homogeneous porous media (Gauglitz et al., 2002). The conditions for propagation of foam are less demanding than those for creation of new foam. However, there still can be a minimum superficial velocity necessary for propagation of foam, except that it could be significantly smaller than the minimum velocity for foam generation from an initial state of no-foam. At even lower superficial velocity, theory (Kam and Rossen, 2003) predicts a collapse of foam. In this study, we extend the experimental approach of Friedmann et al. in the context of the theory of Ashoori et al. We use a cylindrical core with stepwise increasing diameters such that the superficial velocity in the outlet section is 1/16 of that in the inlet. N2 foam is created and stabilized by an alpha olefin sulfonate surfactant. Previously (Yu et al., 2019), we mapped the conditions for foam generation in a Bentheimer sandstone core as a function of total superficial velocity, surfactant concentration and injected gas fraction (foam quality). In this study, we extend the map to include the conditions for propagation of foam, after its creation in the narrow inlet section at greater superficial velocity. Thereafter, by reducing superficial velocity, we map the conditions for foam collapse. Our results suggest that the minimum superficial velocities for foam generation, propagation and maintenance increase with increasing foam quality and decreasing surfactant concentration, in agreement with theory. The minimum velocity for propagation of foam is much less than that for foam generation, and that for foam maintenance is less than that for propagation. The implications of our lab results for field application of foam are discussed.@en

As foam is injected into an oil reservoir, the region near an injector can become oil-free due to the relatively high capillary number. Foam created in this region encounters oil further out in the reservoir. The impact of oil on foam in porous media is usually investigated by co-injecting surfactant, gas and oil, or by injecting pre-generated foam into an oil-saturated core. However, the former experiment does not give information on the impact of oil on pre-generated foam, and from the latter experiment one cannot easily obtain data at different oil fractional flows, necessary to model the impact of oil on pre-generated foam. Here the impact of crude oil on pre-generated foam is studied by co-injecting surfactant solution and gas into a relative narrow core (0.01 m diameter), and injecting oil into the porous medium some distance downstream from the inlet, through ports in the side of the porous medium. By injecting the three phases into the core we investigate the flow behaviour of foam with oil at fixed fractional flows of all three phases. The relatively narrow core allows rapid contact between the injected crude oil and pre-generated foam. We observe a progressive decrease in the apparent viscosity of the foam after encountering oil. Foams with a higher gas fraction experience a more significant weakening by oil over the length of the core than foams with a lower gas fraction. By the end of the core, the apparent viscosities of foam with a higher gas fraction approach values observed with three-phase co-injection. Foam made with surfactant pre-equilibrated with the crude oil propagated for a shorter distance in presence of oil than foam made with surfactant that hasn’t contacted oil before. We present a novel, but relatively simple method to investigate the change of foam mobility as it encounters oil in a porous medium, at controlled fractional flows of all phases. We show that in our case the apparent viscosity of foam with oil can decrease by more than a factor of four over a distance of 0.15 m, indicating that foam and oil reach steady-state (as observed with three-phase co-injection) almost instantaneously compared to the length of a reservoir-simulation grid-block.@en