The fracture behavior of a white etching layer formed on the rail surface in pearlitic steels during the rail-wheel contact is investigated using indentation-based microcantilever fracture tests. The sample thickness is in the order of 5 μm. The local fracture toughness of the white etching layer, its neighboring brown etching layer, martensite and pearlite with similar chemical composition are determined and compared to ferritic steels. All samples show stable crack growth accompanied by significant plasticity at the crack tip. The toughnesses scale inversely with the microhardness. The white etching layer exhibits a toughness of 16.0 ± 1.2 MPa m1/2 which is in the same range as the fully martensitic steel. It is shown that the local fracture toughness can be roughly estimated based on the Vickers hardness of the white etching layer. Also, an estimation of a critical defect size in white etching layers which considerably furthers the understanding of crack initiation is made in this study. Furthermore, various criteria for analyzing the elasto plastic fracture toughness are compared.@en

Failure in engineering materials like steels is strongly affected by in-service deleterious alterations in their microstructure. White Etching Layers (WELs) are an example of such in-service alterations in the pearlitic microstructure at the rail surface. Cracks initiate in the rails due to delamination and fracture of these layers and propagate into the base material posing severe safety concerns. In this study, we investigate the microscale fracture behaviour of these WELs. We use in situ elastic-plastic fracture mechanics using J-integral to quantify the fracture toughness. Although usually assumed brittle, the fracture toughness of 21–25 MPa√m reveals a semi-brittle nature of WELs. Based on a comparison of the fracture toughness and critical defect size of WELs with the undeformed pearlitic steels, WELs are detrimental for rails. In the micro fracture tests, WELs show crack tip blunting, branching, and significant plasticity during crack growth due to their complex microstructure. The fracture behaviour of the WELs is governed by their microstructural constituents such as phases (martensite/austenite), grain size, dislocation density and carbon segregation to dislocations and grain boundaries. We observed dislocation annihilation in some martensitic grains in the WELs which also contributes to their fracture behaviour. Additionally, the strain-induced transformation from austenite to martensite affects the crack growth and fracture.@en