T. Verlaan
Please Note
10 records found
1
This paper investigates whether integrating chromatin accessibility into GRN inference can help explain gene regulatory changes in specific brain cell types during AD progression by evaluating whether ScReNI's ATAC-derived terms improve biological support beyond RNA-only inference. Using a Python reimplementation, we decompose the published ScReNI formula and assess formula variants on the mouse retina development benchmark with ChIP-Atlas precision and network-clustering ARI. We then apply the same component analysis to SEA-AD MTG data and evaluate whether literature reported AD-related microglia genes survive feature selection.
The results suggest that removing the regulator-locus term and using TF-specific target-peak attribution improves performance of the ScReNI weight formula on the mouse retina development dataset. However, before ScReNI can support strong AD-specific regulatory claims in SEA-AD, feature selection must retain disease-relevant regulators and validation must be performed using human brain cell-type-specific benchmarks. ...
This paper investigates whether integrating chromatin accessibility into GRN inference can help explain gene regulatory changes in specific brain cell types during AD progression by evaluating whether ScReNI's ATAC-derived terms improve biological support beyond RNA-only inference. Using a Python reimplementation, we decompose the published ScReNI formula and assess formula variants on the mouse retina development benchmark with ChIP-Atlas precision and network-clustering ARI. We then apply the same component analysis to SEA-AD MTG data and evaluate whether literature reported AD-related microglia genes survive feature selection.
The results suggest that removing the regulator-locus term and using TF-specific target-peak attribution improves performance of the ScReNI weight formula on the mouse retina development dataset. However, before ScReNI can support strong AD-specific regulatory claims in SEA-AD, feature selection must retain disease-relevant regulators and validation must be performed using human brain cell-type-specific benchmarks.
Analysis of HVG use in the ScReNI pipeline
A comparison of global and cell-type specific HVG selection
Specifically, this work compares the highly variable gene (HVG) selection strategy used in ScReNI with a newly proposed approach: type-specific HVG selection. Instead of selecting the top HVGs globally from the entire dataset, we propose selecting the top HVGs within each cell type and inferring the GRN of each cell using only genes specific to its cell type. The comparison is conducted across multiple structural and biological metrics, and the type-specific selection approach shows overall improved performance compared to the original method. ...
Specifically, this work compares the highly variable gene (HVG) selection strategy used in ScReNI with a newly proposed approach: type-specific HVG selection. Instead of selecting the top HVGs globally from the entire dataset, we propose selecting the top HVGs within each cell type and inferring the GRN of each cell using only genes specific to its cell type. The comparison is conducted across multiple structural and biological metrics, and the type-specific selection approach shows overall improved performance compared to the original method.
Cell-specific Gene Regulatory Networks in Alzheimer’s Disease
A Differential Analysis of Regulatory Changes Across Cell Types
cell’s dysfunction is thought to involve changes in how its genes are regulated rather
than only changes in their expression. Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) model these
regulatory decisions, and recent single-cell methods can infer a separate network for
each individual cell. How such cell-specific networks change in disease, and whether
any changes are shared across cell types or unique to particular ones, remains largely
unexplored. This work asks which regulatory relationships differ between AD and
healthy cells, and to what extent these differences are cell-type specific. To address
this, the cell-specific GRN method ScReNI is reimplemented in Python and applied
to paired single-nucleus RNA and ATAC data from the SEA-AD cohort (27 donors),
inferring one network per cell for microglia and an excitatory-neuron subclass (L2/3
IT). A differential pipeline then compares the networks against disease severity at
the level of individual transcription-factor-to-target edges and of co-regulated gene
modules, complemented by a module-preservation test, treating the donor as the unit of replication. The inferred networks change relatively little with disease: no edge survives stringent correction and weight-based filtering, the module co-regulation structure is preserved, and no module-specific shift is detected in either cell type. The one robust signal is a modest, severity-graded decline in overall regulatory activity in L2/3 IT neurons that persists after adjusting for sequencing depth and is absent in microglia. The results are best read as an absence of strong evidence rather than evidence of absence, motivating larger cohorts and broader gene panels in future work. ...
cell’s dysfunction is thought to involve changes in how its genes are regulated rather
than only changes in their expression. Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) model these
regulatory decisions, and recent single-cell methods can infer a separate network for
each individual cell. How such cell-specific networks change in disease, and whether
any changes are shared across cell types or unique to particular ones, remains largely
unexplored. This work asks which regulatory relationships differ between AD and
healthy cells, and to what extent these differences are cell-type specific. To address
this, the cell-specific GRN method ScReNI is reimplemented in Python and applied
to paired single-nucleus RNA and ATAC data from the SEA-AD cohort (27 donors),
inferring one network per cell for microglia and an excitatory-neuron subclass (L2/3
IT). A differential pipeline then compares the networks against disease severity at
the level of individual transcription-factor-to-target edges and of co-regulated gene
modules, complemented by a module-preservation test, treating the donor as the unit of replication. The inferred networks change relatively little with disease: no edge survives stringent correction and weight-based filtering, the module co-regulation structure is preserved, and no module-specific shift is detected in either cell type. The one robust signal is a modest, severity-graded decline in overall regulatory activity in L2/3 IT neurons that persists after adjusting for sequencing depth and is absent in microglia. The results are best read as an absence of strong evidence rather than evidence of absence, motivating larger cohorts and broader gene panels in future work.
The Geography of Gene Regulation in Alzheimer's Disease
Inferring and Analysing Spatial Gene Regulatory Networks with ScReNI and Tangram
Stability of Cell-Specific Gene Regulatory Networks Inferred by ScReNI
Why Out-of-Bag Accuracy Falls Short and Edge Weight Variance Shows Promise
From Latent to Blatant Space
Coupling Biological Systems to Neural Networks for Improved Model Interpretability