Big mechanically-active culture systems (BigMACS) are promising to stimulate, control, and pattern cell and tissue behaviours with less soluble factor requirements. However, it remains challenging to predict if and how distributed mechanical forces impact single-cell behaviours to pattern tissue. In this study, we introduce a tissue-scale finite element analysis framework able to correlate sub-cellular quantitative histology with centimetre-scale biomechanics. Our framework is relevant to diverse BigMACS, including media perfusion, tensile-stress, magnetic, and pneumatic tissue culture platforms. We apply our framework to understand how the design and operation of a multi-axial soft robotic bioreactor can spatially control mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) proliferation, orientation, differentiation to smooth muscle, and extracellular vascular matrix deposition. We find MSC proliferation and matrix deposition to positively correlate with mechanical stimulation but cannot be locally patterned by soft robot mechanical stimulation within a centimetre scale tissue. In contrast, local stress distribution was able to locally pattern MSC orientation and differentiation to smooth muscle phenotypes, where MSCs aligned perpendicular to principal stress direction and expressed increased α-SMA with increasing 3D Von Mises Stresses from 0 to 15 kPa. Altogether, our new biomechanical-histological simulation framework is a promising technique to derive the future mechanical design equations to control cell behaviours and engineer patterned tissue.

Vascular compliance is considered both a cause and a consequence of cardiovascular disease and a significant factor in the mid- and long-term patency of vascular grafts. However, the biomechanical effects of localised changes in compliance cannot be satisfactorily studied with the available medical imaging technologies or surgical simulation materials. To address this unmet need, we developed a coupled silico-vitro platform which allows for the validation of numerical fluid-structure interaction results as a numerical model and physical prototype. This numerical one-way and two-way fluid-structure interaction study is based on a three-dimensional computer model of an idealised femoral artery which is validated against patient measurements derived from the literature. The numerical results are then compared with experimental values collected from compliant arterial phantoms via direct pressurisation and ring tensile testing. Phantoms within a compliance range of 1.4–68.0%/100 mmHg were fabricated via additive manufacturing and silicone casting, then mechanically characterised via ring tensile testing and optical analysis under direct pressurisation with moderately statistically significant differences in measured compliance ranging between 10 and 20% for the two methods. One-way fluid-structure interaction coupling underestimated arterial wall compliance by up to 14.7% compared with two-way coupled models. Overall, Solaris™ (Smooth-On) matched the compliance range of the numerical and in vivo patient models most closely out of the tested silicone materials. Our approach is promising for vascular applications where mechanical compliance is especially important, such as the study of diseases which commonly affect arterial wall stiffness, such as atherosclerosis, and the model-based design, surgical training, and optimisation of vascular prostheses.