Automatic speech recognition (ASR) should serve every speaker, not only the majority “standard” speakers of a language. In order to build inclusive ASR, mitigating the bias against speaker groups who speak in a “non-standard” or “diverse” way is crucial. We aim to mitigate the bias against non-native-accented Flemish in a Flemish ASR system. Since this is a low-resource problem, we investigate the optimal type of data augmentation, i.e., speed/pitch perturbation, cross-lingual voice conversion-based methods, and SpecAugment, applied to both native Flemish and non-native-accented Flemish, for bias mitigation. The results showed that specific types of data augmentation applied to both native and non-native-accented speech improve non-native-accented ASR while applying data augmentation to the non-native-accented speech is more conducive to bias reduction. Combining both gave the largest bias reduction for human-machine interaction (HMI) as well as read-type speech.@en

Research has shown that automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems exhibit biases against different speaker groups, e.g., based on age or gender. This paper presents an investigation into bias in recent Flemish ASR. Seeing as Belgian Dutch, which is also known as Flemish, is often not included in Dutch ASR systems, a state-of-the-art ASR system for Dutch is trained using the Netherlandic Dutch data from the Spoken Dutch Corpus. Using the Flemish data from the JASMIN-CGN corpus, word error rates for various regional variants of Flemish are then compared. In addition, the most misrecognized phonemes are compared across speaker groups. The evaluation confirms a bias against speakers from West Flanders and Limburg, as well as against children, male speakers, and non-native speakers. @en