Monumental architecture produced under authoritarian regimes often retains symbolic significance after political transition, resulting in contested readings. While existing research focuses on the relationship between monumental architecture and political power in socialist states, less attention has been paid to its relationship with local communities in post-socialist contexts. This thesis examines how contested readings of the Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest shape local perceptions, particularly in the period 1989-1994. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of scholarly and cultural sources, including primary and secondary material, it explores how local communities construct and negotiate these readings. The findings demonstrate a shift from perceptions of oppression and rejection to pragmatic reappropriation, highlighting how the Palace has been institutionally reframed and remains active in today’s collective memory. This study contributes to broader debates on place, collective memory, and resilience in post-authoritarian urban contexts.