Non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) are key precursors of ozone and secondary organic aerosols. As one of the world's largest NMVOC emitters, accurate emission inventories are essential for understanding and mitigating air pollution in China. Commonly-used inventories (e.g., MEIC) are largely based on bottom-up methods, which often fail to capture the spatiotemporal variability of NMVOC emissions, resulting in significant model-observation mismatches. This study evaluates the shape factor, filtered data volume, and monthly mean biases of OMI, OMPS, and TROPOMI formaldehyde products, with the latest OMPS and TROPOMI retrievals offering substantially higher effective spatiotemporal coverage. Monthly NMVOC emissions over China in 2020 are then optimized by independently assimilating formaldehyde retrievals either from OMPS or from TROPOMI, using a self-developed 4DEnVar assimilation emission inversion system. The OMPS- and TROPOMI-driven assimilation yields consistent seasonal and regional increments in NMVOC emissions in general, but distinctions are also notable. A consistency analysis is introduced to assess the reliability of these two posterior emissions. Highly consistent increments are obtained in the North China Plain (May-June), the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta (January-March, October-December), and the Sichuan Basin (January, June-December). These adjustments significantly improve surface ozone simulations, with 81.25 % of consistent cases demonstrating reduced biases and an average RMSE reduction of 24.7 %. These findings highlight the effectiveness of OMPS and TROPOMI formaldehyde assimilation, coupled with consistency analysis, in refining NMVOC emission estimates and enhancing ozone simulation accuracy. Similar promising results are achieved in the OMPS/TROPOMI-based NMVOC emission inversion in 2019.

Dust storms pose significant risks to health and property, necessitating accurate forecasting for preventive measures. Despite advancements, dust models grapple with uncertainties arising from emission and transport processes. Data assimilation addresses these by integrating observations to rectify model error, enhancing forecast precision. The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) is a widely used assimilation algorithm that effectively optimize model states, particularly in terms of intensity adjustment. However, the EnKF's efficacy is challenged by position errors between modeled and observed dust features, especially under substantial position errors. This study introduces the valid time shifting ensemble Kalman filter (VTS-EnKF), which combines stochastic EnKF with a valid time shifting mechanism. By recruiting additional ensemble members from neighboring valid times, this method not only accommodates variations in dust load but also explicitly accounts for positional uncertainties. Consequently, the enlarged ensemble better represents both the intensity and positional errors, thereby optimizing the utilization of observational data. The proposed VTS-EnKF was evaluated against two severe dust storm cases from spring 2021, demonstrating that position errors notably deteriorated forecast performance in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) and normalized mean bias (NMB), impeding the EnKF's effective assimilation. Conversely, the VTS-EnKF improved both the analysis and forecast accuracy compared to the conventional EnKF. Additionally, to provide a more rigorous assessment of its performance, experiments were conducted using fewer ensemble members and different time intervals.

Measurements collected from ground monitoring stations have gained popularity as a valuable data source for evaluating numerical models and correcting model errors through data assimilation. The penalty quantified by simulation minus observations drives both model evaluation and assimilation. However, the penal forces are challenged by the existence of a spatial-scale disparity between model simulations and observations. Chemical transport models (CTMs) divide the atmosphere into grid cells, providing a structured way to simulate atmospheric processes. However, their spatial resolution often does not match the limited coverage of in situ measurements, especially for short-lived air pollutants. Within a broad grid cell, air pollutant concentrations can exhibit significant heterogeneity due to their rapid generation and dissipation. Ground observations with traditional methods (including “nearest search” and “grid mean”) are less representative when compared to model simulations. This study develops a new land-use-based representative (LUBR) observational operator to generate spatially representative gridded observations for model evaluation. It incorporates high-resolution urban–rural land use data to address intra-grid variability. The LUBR operator has been validated to consistently provide insights that align with satellite Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) measurements. It is an effective solution to accurately quantify these spatial-scale mismatches and further resolve them via assimilation. Model evaluations with 2015–2017 NO2 measurements in the study area demonstrate that biases and errors differed substantially when the LUBR and other operators were used, respectively. The results highlight the importance of considering fine-scale urban–rural differences when comparing models and observations, especially for short-lived pollutants like NO2.