E. Kalogianni
Please Note
39 records found
1
Spatial plan registration and compliance checks in Estonia, based on LADM part 5
Spatial plan information
BIM/IFC as input for registering apartment rights in a 3D Land Administration Systems
A prototype webservice
The key contributions include:
– an international standardised cadastral survey information model;
– an international standards’ based cadastral survey workflow;
– a methodology for developing LADM-based country profiles;
– an international standardised 3D spatial profiles of varying complexity;
– a web-based 3D LA prototype;
– the introduction of the data lifecycle concept in 3D LA.
Several of these concepts have been acknowledged by ISO and OGC and have already been adopted in LADM Edition II (ISO 19152-2:2025).
This work provides practitioners, policymakers, and researchers with the tools and vision to advance innovative, transparent, and future-ready LASs. ...
The key contributions include:
– an international standardised cadastral survey information model;
– an international standards’ based cadastral survey workflow;
– a methodology for developing LADM-based country profiles;
– an international standardised 3D spatial profiles of varying complexity;
– a web-based 3D LA prototype;
– the introduction of the data lifecycle concept in 3D LA.
Several of these concepts have been acknowledged by ISO and OGC and have already been adopted in LADM Edition II (ISO 19152-2:2025).
This work provides practitioners, policymakers, and researchers with the tools and vision to advance innovative, transparent, and future-ready LASs.
Refining the survey model of the LADM ISO 19152–2
Land registration
Cadastral surveying involves the delineation of property boundaries and the extent and documentation of easements and restrictions (imposed by private or public law), forming the foundation for Land Administration (LA). Survey models and processes constitute vital parts of Cadastres and Land Administration Systems (LASs). However, these models are often inadequately documented and lack standardization in practice. To address the global diversity and complexity of legal and administrative challenges in LA, standardization efforts have yielded the ISO 19152:2012 (ISO, 2012) Land Administration Domain Model (LADM), the Global Land Tool Network's (GLTN) Social Tenure Domain Model (STDM), and the OGC LandInfra/InfraGML standard. The current edition of the LADM focuses on standardised conceptual modelling of LA-related information, including a dedicated sub-package for Spatial and Surveying representation. As part of the ongoing LADM revision, a refined survey model is being developed to support a broad range of surveying and data acquisition approaches and levels of accuracy. Recognizing that surveying technology is not bound by national practices and regulations, this paper focuses specifically on the surveying aspect of LADM. It illustrates that the proposed refined survey model is applicable not only to conventional real property formation but also to participatory land rights recordation processes. The approach adopted in this research is technology-neutral, accommodating the ongoing evolution of surveying technology. It offers support for a broad range of surveying and data acquisition approaches, with varying levels of accuracy. As the demand for high-precision positioning has been persistent within the land mapping and surveying community, particularly since the initial adoption of GPS, aiming to achieve centimetre-level accuracies (initially confined to local services), the paper addresses the fundamental principles of the High Accuracy Service (HAS) concept within the proposed model. The main results presented in this paper are the conceptual model of the refined survey model of LADM Edition II (ISO19152–2), as well as an abstract, reference, cadastral surveying workflow following the principles of the proposed model.
The decision to refine the existing content and to extend the scope of Edition I of the ISO 19152:2012 Land Administration Domain Model (LADM) is a response to requests from the international Land Administration (LA) community. This response has to be formally organised in accordance with ISO guidelines. This begins with gathering feedback from ISO/TC 211 Member States on the need for updated and enhanced capabilities of the LADM. In addition, several proposals have been made to extend the scope of the LADM Edition I. After analysing the feedback received, it was proposed to develop the LADM Edition II as a multi-part standard: Part 1 — Generic conceptual model, Part 2 — Land registration, Part 3 — Marine georegulation, Part 4 — Valuation information, Part 5 — Spatial plan information and Part 6 — Implementation aspects. In other words, Edition I focuses on land tenure, while the design and development of Edition II is based on the inclusion of rights, restrictions and responsibilities (RRRs) concerning marine georegulation, valuation information, spatial plan information as well as LADM implementation. 3D representations are relevant for all parts.
This paper focuses on the design of the new structure of the second edition of the LADM and on the (operational) capabilities of this new edition in relation to the LA issues in Parts (standards addressing a specific part of the scope) and Packages (groups of conceptually close classes), with a particular attention to the requirements and design related decisions taken in the revision process. The parts 1, 2, 4 and 5 are the parts in which the authors are currently involved. Part 1 will be a high-level umbrella standard; Part 2 is largely based on LADM Edition I and focuses on land registration, with an enhanced support on the surveying functionality, including new subclasses of spatial unit, and extended 3D spatial profiles. Part 3 harmonises the description of RRRs and aligns land concepts with marine aspects from the marine domain based on the International Hydrographic Organisation (IHO) S121 Maritime Limits and Boundaries Product Specification. Part 4 deals with valuation information used and produced in the context of land administration, while Part 5 deals with spatial planning information and includes the planned use of the land (zoning), resulting in RRRs. Lastly, Part 6 is planned to be about implementation of the LADM and will be developed in close collaboration with the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC).
The methodology involves several key steps. First, a country profile for Estonia using LADM Part 5 is developed, tailored to the specific needs of the Estonian LAS. This profile integrates with PLANK, the Estonian spatial plan database, incorporating how Estonia acquires, stores, and requires data in their spatial plans. Next, a PostgreSQL database is created to store this profile. Pilot Detailed Plan datasets encoded in IFC format are then imported into the database using FME scripts, mapping the data to relevant sections. This integrated database supports digital permitting processes, specifically plan compliance checks between different levels of spatial plans. Throughout the research, the country profile is refined based on the optimizations of the database, driven by the specific requirements of the input data processed through FME scripts. Given that LADM is a standardized model, the database enforces specific data structures, ensuring processed data is valuable and relevant. The FME scripts facilitate this process, ensuring the data extracted from the database is standardized and user-friendly. Constraints such as maximum building height restrictions are pre-processed and stored within the database, enabling users to access this information without manually reviewing raw plan data. Later, the database was sampled using pilot datasets, with the tools and scripts made available on the research’s GitHub repository. After storing the spatial plan data in the database, data can be directly accessed by scripts designed to execute compliance checks between Detailed Plans and Master Plans, as shown in the Estonia case study. Although developing these specific checks is beyond this research's scope, the work was structured to integrate smoothly with the processes used in the Estonia case study.
Preliminary findings show that combining LADM with IFC improves data representation, enhances interoperability, and establishes a consistent standard for compliance checks between Master and Detailed Plans. This research contributes to developing standardized, reliable, and efficient permit checking systems, with important implications for urban planning and land management. ...
The methodology involves several key steps. First, a country profile for Estonia using LADM Part 5 is developed, tailored to the specific needs of the Estonian LAS. This profile integrates with PLANK, the Estonian spatial plan database, incorporating how Estonia acquires, stores, and requires data in their spatial plans. Next, a PostgreSQL database is created to store this profile. Pilot Detailed Plan datasets encoded in IFC format are then imported into the database using FME scripts, mapping the data to relevant sections. This integrated database supports digital permitting processes, specifically plan compliance checks between different levels of spatial plans. Throughout the research, the country profile is refined based on the optimizations of the database, driven by the specific requirements of the input data processed through FME scripts. Given that LADM is a standardized model, the database enforces specific data structures, ensuring processed data is valuable and relevant. The FME scripts facilitate this process, ensuring the data extracted from the database is standardized and user-friendly. Constraints such as maximum building height restrictions are pre-processed and stored within the database, enabling users to access this information without manually reviewing raw plan data. Later, the database was sampled using pilot datasets, with the tools and scripts made available on the research’s GitHub repository. After storing the spatial plan data in the database, data can be directly accessed by scripts designed to execute compliance checks between Detailed Plans and Master Plans, as shown in the Estonia case study. Although developing these specific checks is beyond this research's scope, the work was structured to integrate smoothly with the processes used in the Estonia case study.
Preliminary findings show that combining LADM with IFC improves data representation, enhances interoperability, and establishes a consistent standard for compliance checks between Master and Detailed Plans. This research contributes to developing standardized, reliable, and efficient permit checking systems, with important implications for urban planning and land management.
Spatial planning in Greece operates on multiple levels—national, regional, and local/municipal—each corresponding to different scales of implementation. The national level offers broad spatial guidelines, while the local level focuses on community-specific planning, which may encompass one or more municipalities or even regional or hyper-local areas. Given the complexity of spatial planning processes in Greece, standardization is vital for ensuring interoperability across the different hierarchical levels of government and stakeholders. This paper aims to make the organization of spatial planning-related information in Greece more efficient and transparent, thereby promoting sustainable growth and urban development using consistent spatial data structures and clear legal and administrative procedures.
Therefore, the paper examines the country profiles of LADM Part 5 that have been developed (as in the case of Indonesia, Turkey and others), with a focus on the current state and evolution of spatial planning in Greece. It maps the existing spatial planning framework against the concepts and classes of LADM Part 5, resulting in the development of a tailored country profile for Greece. This profile is illustrated through UML diagrams and at the next step of this research, it will be implemented in a database and validated through instance-level diagrams and practical implementation using 2 case studies. Future work includes the comparison of the country profile for LADM Part 5 for Greece, with the profile developed for Turkey using corresponding use cases. ...
Spatial planning in Greece operates on multiple levels—national, regional, and local/municipal—each corresponding to different scales of implementation. The national level offers broad spatial guidelines, while the local level focuses on community-specific planning, which may encompass one or more municipalities or even regional or hyper-local areas. Given the complexity of spatial planning processes in Greece, standardization is vital for ensuring interoperability across the different hierarchical levels of government and stakeholders. This paper aims to make the organization of spatial planning-related information in Greece more efficient and transparent, thereby promoting sustainable growth and urban development using consistent spatial data structures and clear legal and administrative procedures.
Therefore, the paper examines the country profiles of LADM Part 5 that have been developed (as in the case of Indonesia, Turkey and others), with a focus on the current state and evolution of spatial planning in Greece. It maps the existing spatial planning framework against the concepts and classes of LADM Part 5, resulting in the development of a tailored country profile for Greece. This profile is illustrated through UML diagrams and at the next step of this research, it will be implemented in a database and validated through instance-level diagrams and practical implementation using 2 case studies. Future work includes the comparison of the country profile for LADM Part 5 for Greece, with the profile developed for Turkey using corresponding use cases.
Bridging Sustainable Development Goals and Land Administration
The Role of the ISO 19152 Land Administration Domain Model in SDG Indicator Formalization
3D Land Administration
Current Status (2022) and Expectation for the Near Future (2026) – Initial Analysis
The questionnaire on 3D Land Administration is conducted as a successor of the previous questionnaire on 3D Cadastres, which has been conducted three times till today, by the Working Group in 2010, 2014 and 2018. The first, documented the status in 2010 and expectations back then for 2014. This was followed by the second questionnaire (status 2014 and expectations 2018) and the third one (status of 2018 and plans for 2022).
All members/ countries the Working Group have been requested to provide information about the current the status of 3D Land Administration Systems/ Cadastres (at the end of 2022) and the expectations/plans for 2026. The purpose of the survey that is has been conducted and reported in this paper, is to make an inventory of the status of 3D Land Administration at the end of 2022 and the plans/ expectations for the near future (2026) from countries all over the world.
The completed questionnaires, per country are fully available via the participants’ page of the 3D Land Administration Working Group website. The responses have been analysed and reported in various publications (van Oosterom et al. 2011, van Oosterom et al. 2014 and Shnaidman et al., 2019). In total, thirty-seven (37) countries have completed the questionnaire and have been received by time of conducting the initial analysis as described in this paper. Similar to the previous questionnaires, it is likely that there will be some completed questionnaires that will be sent by the countries later. ...
The questionnaire on 3D Land Administration is conducted as a successor of the previous questionnaire on 3D Cadastres, which has been conducted three times till today, by the Working Group in 2010, 2014 and 2018. The first, documented the status in 2010 and expectations back then for 2014. This was followed by the second questionnaire (status 2014 and expectations 2018) and the third one (status of 2018 and plans for 2022).
All members/ countries the Working Group have been requested to provide information about the current the status of 3D Land Administration Systems/ Cadastres (at the end of 2022) and the expectations/plans for 2026. The purpose of the survey that is has been conducted and reported in this paper, is to make an inventory of the status of 3D Land Administration at the end of 2022 and the plans/ expectations for the near future (2026) from countries all over the world.
The completed questionnaires, per country are fully available via the participants’ page of the 3D Land Administration Working Group website. The responses have been analysed and reported in various publications (van Oosterom et al. 2011, van Oosterom et al. 2014 and Shnaidman et al., 2019). In total, thirty-seven (37) countries have completed the questionnaire and have been received by time of conducting the initial analysis as described in this paper. Similar to the previous questionnaires, it is likely that there will be some completed questionnaires that will be sent by the countries later.
One of the significant challenges in current 2D Land Administration Systems (LAS) is defining and registering the Rights, Restrictions and Responsibilities (RRRs) attached to the underground objects. A 3D LAS can facilitate a better understanding, as well as a more efficient registration and clear visualisation of the RRRs than a 2D LAS, through 3D digital modelling of the legal ownership of underground objects below the surface. To register the objects below the surface in a 3D LAS, 3D physical data as well as 3D legal data shall either be registered and integrated into one model, or the physical and legal models shall be linked effectively. In the context of this paper, the IFC (ISO 16739:2018) is used to register the 3D physical data, while the Land Administration Domain Model (LADM, ISO 19152:2012) is used to structure the legal data. To achieve the link of the respective legal and physical data, the classes of the LADM are mapped to the elements of the IFC. A standardised workflow is presented in this paper where the inclusion of the legal, organisational and technical aspects of modelling the legal ownership results in a comprehensive approach to solve the challenges that currently prevent the registration of the RRRs of 3D objects below the surface in LASs. This paper also provides a general method for mapping the LADM classes to the IFC entities. Two case studies were conducted to assess the technical aspect of the workflow, where the RRRs of objects below the surface and the parcels above the surface were registered and visualised on the 3D geospatial visualisation platform CesiumJS.
Global scientific production on LADM-based research
A bibliometric analysis from 2012 to 2020
Multiple Land Administration Domain Model (LADM) related studies have been carried out in two decades. ISO 19152 LADM is an international standard and an abstract, conceptual model covering the land administration domain (including those over land and water and elements above and below the earth's surface). The LADM is considered an important component for managing and developing land administration systems worldwide. In the context of this study's, scientific publications related to LADM are examined to carry out a bibliometric analysis on LADM research from 2012 to 2020. The extent of this investigation is limited to the Scopus database for scientific publications. All databases belong to the most extensive peer-reviewed summary and citation databases. It is noted that this study is based on the same principles as the research published by Paulsson and Paasch (2015), building on existing knowledge and aiming to add value in support to the current development of Edition II of the LADM. In this study, which covers 2012–2020, 175 LADM related scientific publications were found in the Scopus database. When the distribution of publications in journals is examined, Land Use Policy has the most published manuscripts related to ISO 19152 LADM. This analysis considers author identification, type of paper, organisational issues, and bibliometric analysis components. The analysis considered articles, books, and proceedings directly related to the LADM and included in the Scopus database or conference and workshop proceedings. For this, articles and books were selected from the Scopus database. Also, the proceedings were selected from those presented in the International Federation of Surveyors (FIG) events and workshops on LADM. Overall, this paper aims to arrange and present the global scientific production on LADM-based research.
Intense exploitation of land implies the development of multi-level, multi-purpose, overlap-ping and interlocking structures on 3D space, thus resulting in complex, stratified, 3D real property rights between individual owners, as well as restrictions. Legislation regulates the ownership status and use of land by imposing restrictions known as Public Law Restrictions (PLRs). PLRs extend to various fields and various legislative frameworks, such as the protection of archaeological sites, protection and maintenance of underground infrastructures and utilities, environmental protection, flying of unmanned air vehicles, etc. PLRs are usually investigated in the context of property rights and restrictions in the various Land Administration Systems worldwide, and do not often gain specific attention. However, it is noticed that the restrictions that arise from Public Law need to be investigated and classified, so that they can be better utilised in the property status of land ownership. This review paper investigates the legal statutes on PLRs within the context of 3D land administration and the stipulations used to provide unambiguous modelling of PLRs, as provided by the relative literature. Moreover, the PLRs applied in the 3D space, to clearly depict rights, restrictions and responsibilities on the relevant spatial unit (land, air, marine parcel, mine, utility network, etc.), are particularly examined. Therefore, this work is to critically review and assess the aforementioned approaches on PLRs’ registration, modelling and organisation, as provided by a literature survey, and provides an overall view of the requirements and challenges within the development of 3D Land Administration Systems also considering standardisation developments.
Precise and detailed information for infrastructure assets, as well as information about the property interests attached to them are crucial to prevent unnecessary costs, disruptions, and delays when planning, constructing, and managing such objects. Various models encapsulating infrastructure objects information are available, mostly during their design stage, and could be also reused in other stages of the Spatial Development Lifecycle (SDL), such as the Land Registration. In this respect, and as ISO 19152:2012 Land Administration Domain Model is currently under revision, it is well-timed to consider the modelling of infrastructure objects within the scope of the upcoming Edition II of the standard. Given this background, the aim of this paper is to initiate the discussion on the registration options of infrastructure objects in the context of the LADM revision. Attention is given on specific categories of transport infrastructure objects, identifying the information required to be reused in other stages of the SDL, sourced from BIM/ IFC files used in the design stage. As currently IFC does not support infrastructure information, in order to investigate how such information is stored in IFC models based on the modellers' decisions and the software used, two models of transport infrastructure objects coming from the industry were inspected and based on these findings, the conceptual modelling followed, based on the LADM concept. The paper aims to provide insights on to the limitations of the current use of IFC for transport infrastructure objects and propose the future steps to overcome them.