Static type-checking allows us to detect ill-typed programs even before running them. However, the higher complexity of type systems may cause type-checker implementation to differ from their specifications. This causes bugs and makes it hard to reason about the type of systems. To close this gap between implementation and specification, a meta-language Statix was introduced. Using Statix, we can write a specification using constraints over scope graphs and terms. Successfully solving these constraints means that the program is well-typed. However, while Statix ensures that the implementation and specification correspond to each other, it does not offer a way for its users to formally reason about the type systems' specifications. To this end, we introduce a library called statix-in-agda. This library, written using the proof assistant Agda, includes the formalisation of scope graphs and embedding of Statix's constraints. We show how we can use our library to specify the type system of STLC-like language, prove that programs in this language are well-typed, and give type-preservation proof for a type system of a simple toy language with numbers and addition.

Agda2hs is a tool that allows developers to write verified programs using Agda and then translate these programs to Haskell while maintaining the verified properties. Previous research has shown that Agda2hs can be used to produce a verified implementation of a wide range of programs. However, monads that model effectful computations were largely unexplored in the context of Agda2hs. In this paper, we investigate the Reader monad, which gives us a way to model the global state. As monads are in practice commonly combined with other monads, we also investigate the transformer ReaderT. This paper provides the implementation of Reader and ReaderT in Agda, verifies its properties based on laws of type classes functor, applicative, and monad, as well as monad transformer laws for ReaderT, and assesses whether Agda2hs produces their correct and useful translation.