The recycling of ultralight foam concrete (ULFC), both with and without phase-change material (PCM), involves crushing it and using the resulting recycled foam concrete powder (RFCP) as a partial substitute for cement or sand in cement composites. These recycling paths remain insufficiently explored in the literature regarding practical feasibility. Since both RFCP and PCM reduce the flowability of fresh mortars, incorporating RFCP with PCM is, in practice, only feasible with the addition of a superplasticizer (SP). The primary objectives of this study were to determine: (1) the effect of RFCP with PCM, when used to replace cement or sand, on mortar properties, and (2) its influence on the performance of the superplasticizer (SP), to assess the feasibility of using RFCP with PCM in cement composites. The addition of RFCP, both without PCM (RFCP_0) and with PCM (RFCP_PCM), deteriorates the properties of fresh and hardened mortars compared to reference mortars. The negative impact of RFCP is less pronounced when it replaces sand rather than cement. Compared to RFCP_0 mortars, RFCP_PCM mortars exhibit reduced flowability. PCM delays setting and reduces heat evolution during the first 48 h of hardening. PCM does not significantly affect strength or water absorption but increases shrinkage and lowers thermal conductivity. While RFCP_PCM does not impair SP efficiency, PCM causes SP to significantly retard setting and hardening.

Phase change materials (PCM) are receiving ever-growing attention as a promising construction material for improving building energy performance through thermal storage and peak load shifting. The analysis of PCM performance and decision-making related to PCM implementation in building envelopes often relies on building energy simulation software such as EnergyPlus – a de facto standard in the academic world and the industry. For a precise modelling of the dynamic PCM behaviour, it is essential to correctly account for PCM hysteresis. This work introduces two new implementations of PCM hysteresis models in EnergyPlus. Further, it provides an in-depth analysis of four publicly available EnergyPlus-based hysteresis models, including the two newly introduced ones, and identifies the existing limitations for each of them. Finally, it explores the effects of PCM model selection on decision-making using the example of novel PCM-embedded material development. The results of this study show that the current built-in hysteresis model in EnergyPlus is not implemented correctly, and none of the other analysed models is completely free of limitations. Moreover, this work draws attention to the existing contradictions between different PCM modelling approaches, highlighting the critical impact the selection of a PCM model has on PCM-related decision-making. We conclude that while the existing hysteresis models in EnergyPlus are operable – albeit with great caution – they are not yet at the stage where they could be used as a reliable decision-making support tool. Practical real-world integration of PCM in building envelopes is hardly possible without having dependable modelling tools to back it up, and the development of such tools requires far more attention than it is given at the moment.

Given the rising popularity of foam concrete (FC) for both structural and insulating purposes, evaluating the feasibility of recycling after its lifespan is crucial in the context of the growing emphasis on sustainable building practices. One approach to recycling FC incorporating microencapsulated phase change material (MPCM) involves utilizing recycled foam concrete powder (RFCP) as an additive in cement composites. This article aims to investigate the impact of RFCP without and with MPCM when employed as a partial replacement for cement in mortars. Furthermore, the study verifies various processing methods such as crushing, grinding, and heat treatment for RFCP. The results reveal that introducing RFCP, regardless of the MPCM presence and processing method, significantly affects the properties of both cement and mortar. The presence of MPCM in RFCP negatively influences the flowability of fresh mortars, delays the setting time, and reduces the hydration heat within the first 48 h. However, the presence of MPCM does not significantly affect mortars' strength and water absorption but simultaneously it increases shrinkage and decreases thermal conductivity. Grinding RFCP mitigates the adverse effects of MPCM, while thermal processing removes MPCM from RFCP, albeit with an associated increase in water demand. A noteworthy finding is that mortars having 20 % RFCP, with or without MPCM, exhibit compressive strengths exceeding 16 MPa and 42.5 MPa after 2 and 28 days, respectively. These results meet the requirements outlined in EN-196-1 for cement of class 42.5, highlighting the potential to produce CEM II/A-F 42.5 using RFCP with MPCM.

This study presents an early-stage design exploration of NRG-Foam, an innovative insulation material composed of cementitious foam doped with microencapsulated phase change materials (MPCMs). The study comprises the static part that utilizes life cycle assessment and life cycle costing assessment for getting insight into the impacts of the NRG-Foam production process and the dynamic part that identifies the trade-offs between performance characteristics of NRG-Foam using multi-objective optimization. The production of MPCMs was found to be a major contributor to environmental impacts while the addition of small amounts of reduced graphene oxide amplifies the impacts even further. The hot spot analysis pinpointed high electricity consumption as the main driver of environmental impacts. A multi-objective optimization analysis revealed trade-offs between performance characteristics, emphasizing the necessity of compromises during material development. The selection of the MPCM type was shown to be determinative of the final properties of NRG-Foam.

Within traditional design processes, decisions are often made based on individualistic values and late-stage assessments conducted on a predefined set of design alternatives potentially leading to suboptimal design decisions and conflicts. The issues are further amplified by the growing complexity of construction project management where an increasing number of stakeholders are involved. To address those issues, a shift is needed towards a collaborative early stage optimization-based design process. The current optimization-based design approaches are not appropriately integrating stakeholders and their preferences in the optimization process and thereby not reflecting the real-life design and construction process. In this study, we present a pioneering multi-stakeholder design methodology combining preference function modeling theory and a priori optimization enabling stakeholders to find the group-optimal design fairly representing their preferences. The application of the developed methodology is demonstrated on a real-life multi-storey building design case. The study provides a novel approach for managing design and construction projects for academic and industry stakeholders. It also sets the foundation for the further development of stakeholder-oriented optimization-based design.