Background: Many families with clinical early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) remain genetically unexplained. A combination of genetic factors is not standardly investigated. In addition to monogenic causes, we evaluated the possible polygenic architecture in a large series of families, to assess if genetic testing of familial EOAD could be expanded. Methods: Thirty-six pedigrees (77 patients) were ascertained from a larger cohort of patients, with relationships determined by genetic data (exome sequencing data and/or SNP arrays). All families included at least one AD patient with symptom onset <70 years. We evaluated segregating rare variants in known dementia-related genes, and other genes or variants if shared by multiple families. APOE was genotyped and duplications in APP were assessed by targeted test or using SNP array data. We computed polygenic risk scores (PRS) compared with a reference population-based dataset, by imputing SNP arrays or exome sequencing data. Results: In eight families, we identified a pathogenic variant, including the genes APP, PSEN1, SORL1, and an unexpected GRN frameshift variant. APOE-ε4 homozygosity was present in eighteen families, showing full segregation with disease in seven families. Eight families harbored a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), of which six included APOE-ε4 homozygous carriers. PRS was not higher in the families combined compared with the population mean (beta 0.05, P = 0.21), with a maximum increase of 0.61 (OR = 1.84) in the GRN family. Subgroup analyses indicated lower PRS in six APP/PSEN1 families compared with the rest (beta −0.22 vs. 0.10; P = 0.009) and lower APOE burden in all eight families with monogenic cause (beta 0.29 vs. 1.15, P = 0.010). Nine families remained without a genetic cause or risk factor identified. Conclusion: Besides monogenic causes, we suspect a polygenic disease architecture in multiple families based on APOE and rare VUS. The risk conveyed by PRS is modest across the studied families. Families without any identified risk factor render suitable candidates for further in-depth genetic evaluation.

Next-generation sequencing has contributed to our understanding of the genetics of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and has explained a substantial part of the missing heritability of familial AD. We sequenced 19 exomes from 8 Dutch families with a high AD burden and identified EIF2AK3, encoding for protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), as a candidate gene. Gene-based burden analysis in a Dutch AD exome cohort containing 547 cases and 1070 controls showed a significant association of EIF2AK3 with AD (OR 1.84 [95% CI 1.07–3.17], p-value 0.03), mainly driven by the variant p.R240H. Genotyping of this variant in an additional cohort from the Rotterdam Study showed a trend toward association with AD (p-value 0.1). Immunohistochemical staining with pPERK and peIF2α of 3 EIF2AK3 AD carriers showed an increase in hippocampal neuronal cells expressing these proteins compared with nondemented controls, but no difference was observed in AD noncarriers. This study suggests that rare variants in EIF2AK3 may be associated with disease risk in AD.