E.P. de Kater
Please Note
10 records found
1
Method: This review provides a comprehensive overview of steerable bone drill designs identified in patent literature via the Espacenet database and in scientific literature accessed via the Scopus data base. A Boolean search combined with pre-set inclusion criteria returned 78 literature references describing a variety of drill designs.
Results: These drill designs could be categorized based on how the drilling trajectory was defined. Three methods to influence the drilling trajectory were identified: (1) the device (57% of the sources), (2) the environment (15% of the sources): the path is defined based on the tissue interaction forces with the surrounding bone or (3) the user defines the drilling trajectory (28% of the sources).
Discussion: The comprehensive overview of steerable drilling methods provides insights in the possibilities in drill design and may be used as a source of inspiration for the design of novel steerable drill designs. ...
Method: This review provides a comprehensive overview of steerable bone drill designs identified in patent literature via the Espacenet database and in scientific literature accessed via the Scopus data base. A Boolean search combined with pre-set inclusion criteria returned 78 literature references describing a variety of drill designs.
Results: These drill designs could be categorized based on how the drilling trajectory was defined. Three methods to influence the drilling trajectory were identified: (1) the device (57% of the sources), (2) the environment (15% of the sources): the path is defined based on the tissue interaction forces with the surrounding bone or (3) the user defines the drilling trajectory (28% of the sources).
Discussion: The comprehensive overview of steerable drilling methods provides insights in the possibilities in drill design and may be used as a source of inspiration for the design of novel steerable drill designs.
Fix(at)ing the Spine
Exploration of Novel Anchors and Steerable Bone Drills for Spinal Fusion Surgery
Purpose: To create an updated and comprehensive overview of the modeling studies that have been done to understand the mechanics underlying deformities of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), to predict the risk of curve progression and thereby substantiate etiopathogenetic theories. Methods: In this systematic review, an online search in Scopus and PubMed together with an analysis in secondary references was done, which yielded 86 studies. The modeling types were extracted and the studies were categorized accordingly. Results: Animal modeling, together with machine learning modeling, forms the category of black box models. This category is perceived as the most clinically relevant. While animal models provide a tangible idea of the biomechanical effects in scoliotic deformities, machine learning modeling was found to be the best curve-progression predictor. The second category, that of artificial models, has, just as animal modeling, a tangible model as a result, but focusses more on the biomechanical process of the scoliotic deformity. The third category is formed by computational models, which are very popular in etiopathogenetic parameter-based studies. They are also the best in calculating stresses and strains on vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and other surrounding tissues. Conclusion: This study presents a comprehensive overview of the current modeling techniques to understand the mechanics of the scoliotic deformities, predict the risk of curve progression in AIS and thereby substantiate etiopathogenetic theories. Although AIS remains to be seen as a complex and multifactorial problem, the progression of its deformity can be predicted with good accuracy. Modeling of AIS develops rapidly and may lead to the identification of risk factors and mitigation strategies in the near future. The overview presented provides a basis to follow this development.
Tsetse fly inspired steerable bone drill
A proof of concept
Introduction: Bone biopsies have great value for the diagnosis of, amongst others, hematologic diseases. Although the bone biopsy procedure is mostly performed minimally invasive with the use of a slender cannula, the patient may still experience discomfort, especially when the procedure has to be repeated due to an unsuccessful biopsy. Areas covered: This review presents a comprehensive overview of bone biopsy devices presented in the patent literature. The patents were obtained using a classification search combined with keywords in the Espacenet patent database and were subsequently verified using pre-set eligibility criteria. This resulted in 62 unique patents included in this review. Expert opinion: The included patents were categorized based on the used strategies for the three steps that can be identified during a bone biopsy (1) biopsy sampling, (2) biopsy severing and (3) biopsy harvesting. Most patents described strategies for multiple steps. Insight into the used strategies and the comprehensive overview may serve as a source of inspiration for the design of novel bone biopsy devices.
Purpose: This review provides an overview of the patent literature on posteriorly placed intrapedicular bone anchors. Conventional pedicle screws are the gold standard to create a fixation in the vertebra for spinal fusion surgery but may lack fixation strength, especially in osteoporotic bone. The ageing population demands new bone anchors that have an increased fixation strength, that can be placed safely, and, if necessary, can be removed without damaging the surrounding tissue. Methods: The patent search was conducted using a classification search in the Espacenet patent database. Only patents with a Cooperative Patent Classification of A61B17/70 or A61B17/7001 concerning spinal positioners and stabilizers were eligible for inclusion. The search query resulted in the identification of 731 patents. Based on preset inclusion criteria, a total of 56 unique patents on different anchoring methods were included, reviewed and categorized in this study. Results: Five unique fixation methods were identified; (1) anchors that use threading, (2) anchors that utilize a curved path through the vertebra, (3) anchors that (partly) expand, (4) anchors that use cement and (5) anchors that are designed to initiate bone ingrowth. Of the anchor designs included in this study, eight had a corresponding commercial product, six of which were evaluated in clinical trials. Conclusion: This review provides insights into worldwide patented intrapedicular bone anchors that aim to increase the fixation strength compared to the conventional pedicle screw. The identified anchoring methods and their working principles can be used for clinical decision-making and as a source of inspiration when designing novel bone anchors.