J.M.K. Hanna
Please Note
28 records found
1
Exhibition: In the Absence of Evidence
Map(ping) as a Primary Source
The works on display emerge from a research-driven pedagogical environment in which students investigated a range of architectural and urban histories through rigorous historical methodologies and approaches, both traditional and new: archival research, oral narratives, document and textual analysis, comparative methods, and other established forms of inquiry. Within this process, mapping did not function as a final representation of their findings; it became a driving, synthesising force in the investigation itself. Each map operates as a crafted artefact that makes an argument and, in doing so, becomes a form of—dare we say—“fabricated” historical evidence in its own right. The choice of the word “fabricated” here is not to be read as a lack of genuinity, but in its etymological sense: to make, to construct. These maps do not only reveal power relations, they produce evidence, while simultaneously pointing to the interpretive, and configurational nature of historical inquiry.
Although the exhibition unavoidably gestures toward familiar cartographic themes—power, framing, omission and silence, the selective gaze—its intention is to highlight the epistemic role mapping plays in historical work. Historians often encounter gaps, silences, and missing traces in the archive. Mapping is used in these examples as a method for addressing these absences, fabricating evidence through a process that remains transparent, traceable, and, most importantly, open to critique. Through the careful assembly of fragments, relationships, and spatial narratives, the maps here constitute dossiers of clues, forms of reasoning that shape how a historical argument takes form.
This exhibition therefore positions mapping not as illustration, but as inquiry. It asks what map-making enables in history writing: What forms of evidence become possible when relationships are visualised rather than merely described? How do such mappings push history beyond the limits of textual or archival data? It also asks how this work situates itself within an established scholarly conversation on critical cartography. And, finally, it questions how mapping can serve critical ends while remaining conscious of the traditions from which it emerges? How might these mappings travel, circulate, and act beyond the confines of a course, contributing to broader conversations on architecture, society, and the built environment? ...
The works on display emerge from a research-driven pedagogical environment in which students investigated a range of architectural and urban histories through rigorous historical methodologies and approaches, both traditional and new: archival research, oral narratives, document and textual analysis, comparative methods, and other established forms of inquiry. Within this process, mapping did not function as a final representation of their findings; it became a driving, synthesising force in the investigation itself. Each map operates as a crafted artefact that makes an argument and, in doing so, becomes a form of—dare we say—“fabricated” historical evidence in its own right. The choice of the word “fabricated” here is not to be read as a lack of genuinity, but in its etymological sense: to make, to construct. These maps do not only reveal power relations, they produce evidence, while simultaneously pointing to the interpretive, and configurational nature of historical inquiry.
Although the exhibition unavoidably gestures toward familiar cartographic themes—power, framing, omission and silence, the selective gaze—its intention is to highlight the epistemic role mapping plays in historical work. Historians often encounter gaps, silences, and missing traces in the archive. Mapping is used in these examples as a method for addressing these absences, fabricating evidence through a process that remains transparent, traceable, and, most importantly, open to critique. Through the careful assembly of fragments, relationships, and spatial narratives, the maps here constitute dossiers of clues, forms of reasoning that shape how a historical argument takes form.
This exhibition therefore positions mapping not as illustration, but as inquiry. It asks what map-making enables in history writing: What forms of evidence become possible when relationships are visualised rather than merely described? How do such mappings push history beyond the limits of textual or archival data? It also asks how this work situates itself within an established scholarly conversation on critical cartography. And, finally, it questions how mapping can serve critical ends while remaining conscious of the traditions from which it emerges? How might these mappings travel, circulate, and act beyond the confines of a course, contributing to broader conversations on architecture, society, and the built environment?
Neighbors Under Fire
Neighborhood Space and Neighborly Relations in Lebanese War Literature
Adaptive Strategies in Naples and Beirut
Methodology, Scenario Thinking and Design Fiction
Designing for Extremes
Heritage Strategies for Rising Sea Levels Adaptation in The Hague
Sea-Ing Morocco
Architectural Travels to Moroccan Port City Territories
Adaptive Strategies for Dunkirk
A Delft's Perspective
This article explores design education's potential to reimagine industrial and modern locations that fostered segregation and rigid infrastructure. Waterfront redevelopment, energy transitions, and new shipping technologies are ending these areas' lifecycle in many western port cities. Neglected spaces like obsolete infrastructure offer opportunities for innovative ideas. New maritime mindsets and collaborative public spaces are needed for meaningful stakeholder and citizen engagement.
Insights from the Adaptive Strategies master’s elective at Delft University of Technology demonstrate education's role in sparking discussions and developing adaptive strategies. The course, initiated after the 2021 Port of Beirut explosion, used Dunkirk's industrial heritage as a case study. This article argues that education can activate research, generate innovative planning approaches, and create integrated port-city-territory scenarios while questioning architecture's role and limitations. ...
This article explores design education's potential to reimagine industrial and modern locations that fostered segregation and rigid infrastructure. Waterfront redevelopment, energy transitions, and new shipping technologies are ending these areas' lifecycle in many western port cities. Neglected spaces like obsolete infrastructure offer opportunities for innovative ideas. New maritime mindsets and collaborative public spaces are needed for meaningful stakeholder and citizen engagement.
Insights from the Adaptive Strategies master’s elective at Delft University of Technology demonstrate education's role in sparking discussions and developing adaptive strategies. The course, initiated after the 2021 Port of Beirut explosion, used Dunkirk's industrial heritage as a case study. This article argues that education can activate research, generate innovative planning approaches, and create integrated port-city-territory scenarios while questioning architecture's role and limitations.
A Journey Through Water Scarcity
A Blend of Openness and Sharing in Public Spaces and Guarded Secrecy in Four Moroccan Cities
Temporal Framework
Towards a Broader Conceptualization of Time in Design Education
Prospects
Towards an Enhanced Practice of International Design Studio Collaborations
Designing Post-Blast Beirut: Intersecting Perspectives
Reimagining the Edges between Port and City at a Time of Transition
The 2015 Paris terrorist attacks
A threat to urban life and territorial integrity