One way of solving 3sat instances on a quantum computer is to transform the 3sat instances into instances of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimizations (QUBOs), which can be used as an input for the QAOA algorithm on quantum gate systems or as an input for quantum annealers. This mapping is performed by a 3sat-to-QUBO transformation. Recently, it has been shown that the choice of the 3sat-to-QUBO transformation can significantly impact the solution quality of quantum annealing. It has been shown that the solution quality can vary up to an order of magnitude difference in the number of correct solutions received, depending solely on the 3sat-to-QUBO transformation. An open question is: what causes these differences in the solution quality when solving 3sat-instances with different 3sat-to-QUBO transformations? To be able to conduct meaningful studies that assess the reasons for the differences in the performance, a larger number of different 3sat-to-QUBO transformations would be needed. However, currently, there are only a few known 3sat-to-QUBO transformations, and all of them were created manually by experts, who used time and clever reasoning to create these transformations. In this paper, we will solve this problem by proposing an algorithmic method that is able to create thousands of new and different 3sat-to-QUBO transformations, and thus enables researchers to systematically study the reasons for the significant difference in the performance of different 3sat-to-QUBO transformations. Our algorithmic method is an exhaustive search procedure that exploits properties of (Formula presented.) dimensional pattern QUBOs, a concept which has been used implicitly in the creation of 3sat-to-QUBO transformations before, but was never described explicitly. We will thus also formally and explicitly introduce the concept of pattern QUBOs in this paper.@en

To solve 3sat instances on quantum annealers they need to be transformed to an instance of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). When there are multiple transformations available, the question arises whether different transformations lead to differences in the obtained solution quality. Thus, in this paper we conduct an empirical benchmark study, in which we compare four structurally different QUBO transformations for the 3sat problem with regards to the solution quality on D-Wave’s Advantage_system4.1. We show that the choice of QUBO transformation can significantly impact the number of correct solutions the quantum annealer returns. Furthermore, we show that the size of a QUBO instance (i.e., the dimension of the QUBO matrix) is not a sufficient predictor for solution quality, as larger QUBO instances may produce better results than smaller QUBO instances for the same problem. We also empirically show that the number of different quadratic values of a QUBO instance, combined with their range, can significantly impact the solution quality.@en

In this paper, we present an open-source Python framework, called satqubolib. This framework aims to provide all necessary tools for solving (MAX)-3SAT problems on quantum hardware systems via Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). Our framework solves two major issues when solving (MAX)-3SAT instances in the context of quantum computing. Firstly, a common way of solving satisfiability instances with quantum methods is, to transform these instances into instances of QUBO, as QUBO is the input format for quantum annealers and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) on quantum gate systems. Studies have shown, that the choice of this transformation can significantly impact the solution quality of quantum hardware systems. Thus, our framework provides thousands of usable QUBO transformations for satisfiability problems. Doing so also enables practitioners from any domain to immediately explore and use quantum techniques as a potential solver for their domain-specific problems, as long as they can be encoded as satisfiability problems. As a second contribution, we created a dataset of 6000 practically hard and satisfiable SAT instances that are also small enough to be solved with current quantum(-hybrid) methods. This dataset enables meaningful benchmarking of new quantum, quantum-hybrid, and classical methods for solving satisfiability problems.@en

The Stable Marriage Problem (SMP) describes the problem, of finding a stable matching between two equally sized sets of elements (e.g., males and females) given an ordering of preferences for each element. A matching is stable, when there does not exist any match of a male and female which both prefer each other to their current partner under the matching. Finding such a matching of maximum cardinality, when ties and incomplete preference lists are allowed, is called MAX-SMTI and is an NP-hard variation of the SMP. In this work a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formulation for MAX-SMTI is introduced and solved both with D-Wave Systems quantum annealing hardware and by their classical meta-heuristic QBSolv. Both approaches are reviewed against existing state-of-the-art approximation algorithms for MAX-SMTI. Additionally, the proposed QUBO problem can also be used to count stable matchings in SMP instances, which is proven to be a #P-complete problem. The results show, that the proposed (quantum) methods can compete with the classical ones regarding the solution quality and might be a relevant alternative, when quantum hardware scales with respect to the number of qubits and their connectivity.@en

Quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) has become the standard format for optimization using quantum computers, i.e., for both the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) and quantum annealing (QA). We present a toolkit of methods to transform almost arbitrary problems to QUBO by (i) approximating them as a polynomial and then (ii) translating any polynomial to QUBO. We showcase the usage of our approaches on two example problems (ratio cut and logistic regression).@en

Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) can be seen as a generic language for optimization problems. QUBOs attract particular attention since they can be solved with quantum hardware, like quantum annealers or quantum gate computers running QAOA. In this paper, we present two novel QUBO formulations for k-SAT and Hamiltonian Cycles that scale significantly better than existing approaches. For k-SAT we reduce the growth of the QUBO matrix from O(k) to O(log(k)). For Hamiltonian Cycles the matrix no longer grows quadratically in the number of nodes, as currently, but linearly in the number of edges and logarithmically in the number of nodes. We present these two formulations not as mathematical expressions, as most QUBO formulations are, but as meta-algorithms that facilitate the design of more complex QUBO formulations and allow easy reuse in larger and more complex QUBO formulations.@en