Cv

Case M. van Genuchten

info

Please Note

5 records found

Journal article (2024) - Mrinal Roy, Erik Kraaijeveld, Jink C. J. Gude, Case M. van Genuchten, Luuk C. Rietveld, Doris van Halem
Long-term consumption of groundwater containing elevated levels of arsenic (As) can have severe health consequences, including cancer. To effectively remove As, conventional treatment technologies require expensive chemical oxidants to oxidise neutral arsenite (As(III)) in groundwater to negatively charged arsenate (As(V)), which is more easily removed. Rapid sand filter beds used in conventional aeration-filtration to treat anaerobic groundwater can naturally oxidise As(III) through biological processes but require an additional step to remove the generated As(V), adding complexity and cost. This study introduces a novel approach where As(V), produced through biological As(III) oxidation in a sand filter, is effectively removed within the same filter by embedding and operating an iron electrocoagulation (FeEC) system inside the filter. Operating FeEC within the biological filter achieved higher As(III) removal (81 %) compared to operating FeEC in the filter supernatant (67 %). This performance was similar to an analogous embedded-FeEC system treating As(V)-contaminated water (85 %), confirming the benefits of incorporating FeEC in a biological bed for comparable As(III) and As(V) removal. However, operating FeEC in the sand matrix consumed more energy (14 Wh/m3) compared to FeEC operated in a water matrix (7 Wh/m3). The efficiency of As removal increased and energy requirements decreased in such embedded-FeEC systems by deep-bed infiltration of Fe(III)-precipitates, which can be controlled by adjusting flow rate and pH. This study is one of the first to demonstrate the feasibility of embedding FeEC systems in sand filters for groundwater arsenic removal. Such systems capitalise on biological As(III) oxidation in aeration-filtration, effectively eliminating As(V) within the same setup without the need for chemicals or major modifications. ...
Journal article (2023) - K. Wang, P. E. Holm, U. Brinkmann Trettenes, S. R.S. Bandaru, D. van Halem, C. M. van Genuchten
Iron (Fe)-based treatment methods are widely applied to remove carcinogenic arsenic (As) from drinking water, but generate toxic As-laden Fe (oxyhydr)oxide waste that has traditionally been ignored for resource recovery by the water sector. However, the European Commission recently classified As as a Critical Raw Material (CRM), thus providing new incentives to re-think As-laden groundwater treatment sludge. Before As recovery techniques can be developed for groundwater treatment waste, detailed information on its structure and composition is essential. To this end, we comprehensively characterized sludge generated from a variety of As-rich groundwater treatment plants in different geographic regions by combining a suite of macroscopic measurements, such as total digestions, leaching tests and BET surface area with molecular-scale solid-phase analysis by Fe and As K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). We found that the As mass fraction of all samples ranged from ∼200–1200 mg As/kg (dry weight) and the phosphorous (P) content reached ∼0.5–2 mass%. Notably, our results indicated that the influent As level was a poor predictor of the As sludge content, with the highest As mass fractions (940–1200 mg As/kg) measured in sludge generated from treating low groundwater As levels (1.1–22 µg/L). The Fe K-edge XAS data revealed that all samples consisted of nanoscale Fe(III) precipitates with less structural order than ferrihydrite, which is consistent with their high BET surface area (up to >250 m2/g) and large As and P mass fractions. The As K-edge XAS data indicated As was present in all samples predominantly as As(V) bound to Fe(III) precipitates in the binuclear-corner sharing (2C) geometry. Overall, the similar structure and composition of all samples implies that As recovery methods optimized for one type of Fe-based treatment sludge can be applied to many groundwater treatment sludges. Our work provides a critical foundation for further research to develop resource recovery methods for As-rich waste. ...
Journal article (2022) - Mrinal Roy, Case M. van Genuchten, Luuk Rietveld, Doris van Halem
Groundwater contaminated with arsenic (As) must be treated prior to drinking, as human exposure to As at toxic levels can cause various diseases including cancer. Conventional aeration-filtration applied to anaerobic arsenite (As(III)) contaminated groundwater can remove As(III) by co-oxidizing native iron (Fe(II)) and As(III) with oxygen (O2). However, the As(III) removal efficiency of conventional aeration can be low, in part, because of incomplete As(III) oxidation to readily-sorbed arsenate (As(V)). In this work, we investigated a new approach to enhance As(III) co-removal with native Fe(II) by the anaerobic addition of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) prior to aeration. Experiments were performed to co-oxidize Fe(II) and As(III) with H2O2 (anaerobically), O2 (aerobically), and by sequentially adding of H2O2 and O2. Aqueous As(III) and As(V) measurements after the reaction were coupled with solid-phase speciation by Fe and As K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). We found that complete anaerobic oxidation of 100 µM Fe(II) with 100 µM H2O2 resulted in co-removal of 95% of 7 µM As(III) compared to 44% with 8.0-9.0 mg/L dissolved O2. Furthermore, we found that with 100 µM Fe(II), the initial Fe(II):H2O2 ratio was a critical parameter to remove 7 µM As(III) to below the 10 µg/L (0.13 µM) WHO guideline, where ratios of 1:4 (mol:mol) Fe(II):H2O2 led to As(III) removal matching that of 7 µM As(V). The improved As(III) removal with H2O2 was found to occur partly because of the well-established enhanced efficiency of As(III) oxidation in Fe(II)+H2O2 systems relatively to Fe(II)+O2 systems. However, the XAS results unambiguously demonstrated that a large factor in the improved As(III) removal was also due to a systematic decrease in crystallinity, and thus increase in specific surface area, of the generated Fe(III) (oxyhydr)oxides from lepidocrocite in the Fe(II)+O2 system to poorly-ordered Fe(III) precipitates in the Fe(II)+H2O2 system. The combined roles of H2O2 (enhanced As(III) oxidation and structural modification) can be easily overlooked when only aqueous species are measured, but this dual impact must be considered for accurate predictions of As removal in groundwater treatment. ...
Journal article (2021) - Mrinal Roy, Case M. van Genuchten, Luuk Rietveld, Doris van Halem
Arsenic (As) is a toxic element present in many (ground)water sources in the world. Most conventional As removal techniques require pre-oxidation of the neutral arsenite (As(III)) species to the negatively charged arsenate (As(V)) oxyanion to optimize As removal and minimize chemical use. In this work, a novel, continuous-flow As removal system was developed that combines biological As(III) oxidation by bacteria with Fe electrocoagulation (EC), an Fe(0)-based electrochemical technology that generates reactive Fe(III) precipitates to bind As. The bio-integrated FeEC system (bio-FeEC) showed effective oxidation and removal of 150 µg/L As(III), without the need of chemicals. To remove As to below the WHO guideline of 10 µg/L, 10 times lower charge dosage was required for the bio-FeEC system compared to conventional FeEC. This lower Fe dosage requirement reduced sludge production and energy consumption. The As(III) oxidizing biomass was found to consist of bacteria belonging to Comamonadaceae, Rhodobacteraceae and Acidovorax, which are capable of oxidizing As(III) and are common in drinking water biofilms. Characterization of the As-laden Fe solids by X-ray absorption spectroscopy indicated that both bio-FeEC and conventional FeEC produced solids consistent with a mixture of lepidocrocite and 2-line ferrihydrite. Arsenic bound to the solids was dominantly As(V), but a slightly higher fraction of As(V) was detected in the bio-FeEC solids compared to the conventional FeEC. ...
Journal article (2019) - Simon Müller, Thilo Behrends, Case M. van Genuchten
Iron-electrocoagulation is a promising contaminant (e.g. arsenic) removal technology that is based on electrochemical Fe(II) production from steel electrodes and subsequent transport of Fe(II) to the bulk solution, where contaminant removal occurs. Although Fe-electrocoagulation systems have been shown to effectively remove contaminants in extended field trials, the efficiency of field systems can be lower than in laboratory studies. One hypothesis for this disparity is that the Faradaic efficiency of short-term laboratory experiments is higher than field systems operated over extended periods. The Faradaic efficiency is a pivotal performance indicator that we define as the measured Fe dosage normalized by the theoretical Fe dosage calculated by Faraday's law. In this work, we investigated the Faradaic efficiency in laboratory experiments for up to 35 operating cycles (>2 months) with varied Fe(0) anode purity, charge dosage rate, and electrolyte composition. Our results showed that the Faradaic efficiency decreased continuously during repeated operation under typical field conditions (charge dosage rate = 4 C/L/min, synthetic groundwater) regardless of the Fe(0) anode purity, leading to a Faradaic efficiency ≈ 0.6 after 2 months. By contrast, increasing the charge dosage rate to ≥15 C/L/min produced a Faradaic efficiency >0.85 over the entire experiment for both Fe(0) anode purities. Electrolyte solutions free of oxyanions also resulted in sustained Faradaic efficiency >0.85, regardless of the charge dosage rate. Our results confirm a previously proposed relationship between low Faradaic efficiency and the formation of macroscopic electrode surface layers, which consist of Fe (oxyhydr)oxides on the anode and a mixture of Fe (oxyhydr)oxides and calcite on the cathode. Based on these results, we discuss potential strategies to maintain a high Faradaic efficiency during Fe-electrocoagulation field treatment. ...