Analysing single-cell RNA sequencing data is becoming an increasingly tedious task as the size of data sets grows. As a proposed solution, recent discoveries suggest that these data sets can be binarized without losing much information. This in turn should allow for memory and time efficient methods of storage and computation. Numerous analyses techniques require cell clustering as a preliminary procedure, which suggests the need to evaluate binary representation performance under that context. In this work we present a comparison between binary clustering results and the state-of-the-art, with a focus on similarity metric choice and the impact on intermediate steps of the procedure (i.e. similarity matrices and kNN graphs). The method was evaluated on single-cell transcriptomic data sets, utilizing a combination of R and C++ as an evaluation framework. Through these means we found that some of the similarity metrics operating on continuous input can possibly be reproduced with similarity metrics operating on binary input.