Grid-following control (GFL) has been widely implemented as the dominant control method for inverter-based resources (IBR). However, because GFL cannot provide sufficient inertia for frequency regulation, grid-forming control (GFM) is proposed as an alternative solution. However, the impact of grid dynamics characteristics on GFL and GFM control is rarely discussed. Therefore, this paper systematically derives and compares the frequency response of GFL and GFM control, considering the grid dynamics that are emulated by a synchronous generator. The impact of the inertia of GFM is investigated by pole-zero maps.

Highly self-sufficient energy hubs offer a promising solution to mitigate grid congestion in favor of grid operators and to reduce grid fees for the benefit of energy hub operators. Meanwhile, the energy hub's capacity may far exceed the grid connection capacity, creating a weak grid situation. As a result, power quality issues such as voltage fluctuations, frequency deviations, and even instability may occur. In this work, a grid-forming energy storage system (GFM-ESS) is integrated to address these potential problems. A model of the GFM-ESS and energy hub is established based on a 50 kW PV-Hydrogen energy hub demonstrator, where PV-generated power is utilized for green hydrogen production. A trade-off design is proposed to identify the optimal balance between the capacity of the GFM-ESS and the grid connection. The voltage and frequency response at the hub's bus are analyzed to evaluate this trade-off. While experiments with the 50 kW demonstrator are ongoing, simulation results are provided to validate the effectiveness of the proposed design.