Attention bias towards social threat has been linked to loneliness and anxiety, though findings are mixed and concerns about measurement reliability persist. This study examined whether state and trait loneliness, along with personality, self-esteem, social anxiety, and life satisfaction, are associated with attention bias towards social threat images (indicating rejection or exclusion) in young adults (N = 241). AI-generated images were used to enhance control over stimulus content and category distinctions. Participants completed an eye-tracking free-viewing task comprising 40 image matrices (four images per matrix, displayed for 6000 ms). We then computed attention bias (dwell time percentage, total fixation duration percentage, and fixation count percentage) and initial orientation of attention (first fixation percentage). The attention bias measures showed adequate-to-good internal consistency (α = 0.61–0.86). No significant associations emerged between loneliness and attention to socially threatening stimuli, suggesting that heightened vigilance to social threat may not be a feature of loneliness in non-clinical young adults. However, it was found that females exhibited greater attention to social positive images, and baseline pupil diameter was associated with social anxiety. Future research should assess whether loneliness-specific attention bias is a replicable phenomenon, ideally by using an extreme-sampling approach with very lonely individuals.

This study investigated human performance in identifying AI-generated images. In a speeded forced-choice task, 255 participants viewed paired images (one real, one AI-generated by Midjourney) of standard or futuristic cars and buildings and had to identify the AI-generated one, while eye movements were recorded using an eye-tracker. Results revealed a powerful “futurism-as-artificiality” heuristic. Specifically, participants performed poorly (55% correct) when an AI-generated standard image was paired with a real futuristic image. Conversely, accuracy was high (91% correct) when the AI-generated futuristic image was paired with a real standard image. Participants’ gaze landed first on the AI-generated image more often when it depicted a futuristic design than when it depicted a standard one. The demonstrated heuristic presents a double-edged sword for information veracity: it may lead to the uncritical acceptance of AI-generated misinformation that appears conventional, while simultaneously causing real forward-thinking designs to be dismissed as fake.