The rapid adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) is transforming research, education, software development and everyday life. As their use grows, so does the diversity of available models, from general-purpose to code-oriented LLMs that can run both in data centers and on edge devices. Several benchmarks have emerged to evaluate their performance in code generation and completion tasks, yet their energy and time efficiency remain underexplored. This paper evaluates five local LLMs on HumanEval-X and MBPP+ to analyze their accuracy, runtime and energy consumption under CPU-only inference, reflecting realistic on-device deployment scenarios where GPUs are unavailable. The results reveal clear trade-offs between effectiveness and efficiency: while some models achieve higher accuracy, others deliver comparable results with substantially lower energy use. In particular, 3-shot prompting consistently improves runtime and energy efficiency compared to 0-shot, without sacrificing code quality. These findings emphasize that prompt design and model selection must be considered together when deploying LLMs for coding tasks and call for the creation of practical prompt-efficiency guidelines to support more sustainable and efficient use of local LLMs.

The reliability of machine learning (ML) software systems is heavily influenced by changes in data over time. For that reason, ML systems require regular maintenance, typically based on model retraining. However, retraining requires significant computational demand, which makes it energy-intensive and raises concerns about its environmental impact. To understand which retraining techniques should be considered when designing sustainable ML applications, in this work, we study the energy consumption of common retraining techniques. Since the accuracy of ML systems is also essential, we compare retraining techniques in terms of both energy efficiency and accuracy. We showcase that retraining with only the most recent data compared to all available data reduces energy consumption by up to 25%, being a sustainable alternative to the status quo. Furthermore, our findings show that retraining a model only when there is evidence that updates are necessary, rather than on a fixed schedule, can reduce energy consumption by up to 40%, provided a reliable data change detector is in place. Our findings pave the way for better recommendations for ML practitioners, guiding them toward more energy-efficient retraining techniques when designing sustainable ML software systems.

Capacity management is critical for software organizations to allocate resources effectively and meet operational demands. An important step in capacity management is predicting future resource needs often relies on data-driven analytics and machine learning (ML) forecasting models, which require frequent retraining to stay relevant as data evolves. Continuously retraining the forecasting models can be expensive and difficult to scale, posing a challenge for engineering teams tasked with balancing accuracy and efficiency. Retraining only when the data changes appears to be a more computationally efficient alternative, but its impact on accuracy requires further investigation. In this work, we investigate the effects of retraining capacity forecasting models for time series based on detected changes in the data compared to periodic retraining. Our results show that drift-based retraining achieves comparable forecasting accuracy to periodic retraining in most cases, making it a costeffective strategy. However, in cases where data is changing rapidly, periodic retraining is still preferred to maximize the forecasting accuracy. These findings offer actionable insights for software teams to enhance forecasting systems, reducing retraining overhead while maintaining robust performance.

Failure prediction models can be significantly beneficial for managing large-scale complex software systems, but their trustworthiness is severely affected by changes in the data over time, also known as concept drift. Thus, monitoring these models against concept drift and retraining them when the data changes becomes crucial in designing reliable failure prediction models. In this work, we evaluate the effects of monitoring failure prediction models over time using label-independent (unsupervised) drift detectors. We show that retraining based on unsupervised drift detectors instead of periodically reduces the cost of acquiring true labels without compromising accuracy. Furthermore, we propose a novel feature reduction for unsupervised drift detectors and an evaluation pipeline that practitioners can employ to select the most suitable unsupervised drift detector for their application.

The latest advancements in machine learning, specifically in foundation models, are revolutionizing the frontiers of existing software engineering (SE) processes. This is a bi-directional phenomenon, where (1) software systems are now challenged to provide AI-enabled features to their users, and (2) AI is used to automate tasks within the software development lifecycle. In an era where sustainability is a pressing societal concern, our community needs to adopt a long-term plan enabling a conscious transformation that aligns with environmental sustainability values. In this article, we reflect on the impact of adopting environmentally friendly practices to create AI-enabled software systems and make considerations on the environmental impact of using foundation models for software development.

Technology brings exciting opportunities to improve our interactions with the natural surroundings. However, that same technological development might also negatively impact the environment. Every new technology has a carbon footprint, whether from its construction or operation. And most technological developments require software systems, and more recently AI-based software systems. For these software systems to positively impact our environment, they need to be developed and operated with sustainability in mind, also called 'green' in the discipline of software engineering. This chapter explores various dimensions of sustainability in software system development, drawing on existing software quality frameworks. We highlight green software best practices for development and knowledge transfer. We examine AI-based software systems, emphasising the importance of energy efficiency and carbon impact in the next generation of intelligent systems. This entails considering decisions at different stages of the AI lifecycle, ranging from underlying design choices in training pipelines to selecting optimal hardware for training and serving models. This chapter presents the intersection of green software, sustainable software engineering, and green AI as of major importance for future innovation. By prioritising sustainability in software development and AI, we can foster a more sustainable and eco-friendly future, with the potential to reduce energy consumption and mitigate the environmental impact of technology.

Anomaly detection techniques are essential in automating the monitoring of IT systems and operations. These techniques imply that machine learning algorithms are trained on operational data corresponding to a specific period of time and that they are continuously evaluated on newly emerging data. Operational data is constantly changing over time, which affects the performance of deployed anomaly detection models. Therefore, continuous model maintenance is required to preserve the performance of anomaly detectors over time. In this work, we analyze two different anomaly detection model maintenance techniques in terms of the model update frequency, namely blind model retraining and informed model retraining. We further investigate the effects of updating the model by retraining it on all the available data (full-history approach) and only the newest data (sliding window approach). Moreover, we investigate whether a data change monitoring tool is capable of determining when the anomaly detection model needs to be updated through retraining.

For software that relies on machine-learned functionality, model selection is key to finding the right model for the task with desired performance characteristics. Evaluating a model requires developers to i) select from many models (e.g. the Hugging face model repository), ii) select evaluation metrics and training strategy, and iii) tailor trade-offs based on the problem domain. However, current evaluation approaches are either ad-hoc resulting in sub-optimal model selection or brute force leading to wasted compute. In this work, we present GreenRunner, a novel tool to automatically select and evaluate models based on the application scenario provided in natural language. We leverage the reasoning capabilities of large language models to propose a training strategy and extract desired trade-offs from a problem description. GreenRunner features a resource-efficient experimentation engine that integrates constraints and trade-offs based on the problem into the model selection process. Our preliminary evaluation demonstrates that GreenRunner is both efficient and accurate compared to ad-hoc evaluations and brute force. This work presents an important step toward energy-efficient tools to help reduce the environmental impact caused by the growing demand for software with machine-learned functionality. Our tool is available at Figshare GreenRunner.

As the energy footprint generated by software is increasing at an alarming rate, understanding how to develop energy-efficient applications has become a necessity. Previous work has introduced catalogs of coding practices, also known as energy patterns. These patterns are yet limited to Mobile or third-party libraries. In this study, we focus on the Web domain-a main source of energy consumption. First we investigated whether and how Mobile energy patterns can be ported to this domain and found that 20 patterns could be ported. Then, we interviewed six expert web developers from different companies to challenge the ported patterns. Most developers expressed concerns for antipatterns, specifically with functional antipatterns, and were able to formulate guidelines to locate these patterns in the source code. Finally, to quantify the effect of Web energy patterns on energy consumption, we set up an automated pipeline to evaluate two ported patterns: 'Dynamic Retry Delay' (DRD) and 'Open Only When Necessary' (OOWN). With this, we found no evidence that the DRD pattern consumes less energy than its antipattern, while the opposite is true for OOWN. Data and Material: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8404487.

Effective change management is crucial for businesses heavily reliant on software and services to minimise incidents induced by changes. Unfortunately, in practice it is often difficult to effectively use artificial intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) to enhance service management, primarily due to inadequate data quality. Establishing reliable links between changes and the induced incidents is crucial for identifying patterns, improving change deployment, identifying high-risk changes, and enhancing incident response. In this research, we investigate the enhancement of traceability between changes and incidents through AIOps methods. Our approach involves a close examination of incident-inducing changes, the replication of methods linking incidents to the changes that caused them, introducing an adapted method, and demonstrating its results using historical data and practical evaluations. Our findings reveal that incident-inducing changes exhibit different characteristics dependent on context. Furthermore, a significant disparity exists between assessments based on historical data and real-world observation, with an increased occurrence of false positives when identifying links between unlabeled changes and incidents. This study highlights the complex nature of identifying links between changes and incidents, emphasising the contextual influence on AIOps method effectiveness. While we are actively working on improving the quality of current data through AIOps approaches, it remains apparent that further measures are necessary to address issues like data imbalances and promote a postmortem culture that brings attention to the value of properly administrating tickets. A better overview of change failure rates contributes to improved risk compliance and reliable change management.

Although several fairness definitions and bias mitigation techniques exist in the literature, all existing solutions evaluate fairness of Machine Learning (ML) systems after the training stage. In this paper, we take the first steps towards evaluating a more holistic approach by testing for fairness both before and after model training. We evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach and position it within the ML development lifecycle, using an empirical analysis of the relationship between model dependent and independent fairness metrics. The study uses 2 fairness metrics, 4 ML algorithms, 5 real-world datasets and 1600 fairness evaluation cycles. We find a linear relationship between data and model fairness metrics when the distribution and the size of the training data changes. Our results indicate that testing for fairness prior to training can be a "cheap" and effective means of catching a biased data collection process early; detecting data drifts in production systems and minimising execution of full training cycles thus reducing development time and costs.

Visualisations drive all aspects of the Machine Learning (ML) Development Cycle but remain a vastly untapped resource by the research community. ML testing is a highly interactive and cognitive process which demands a human-in-the-loop approach. Besides writing tests for the code base, bulk of the evaluation requires application of domain expertise to generate and interpret visualisations. To gain a deeper insight into the process of testing ML systems, we propose to study visualisations of ML pipelines by mining Jupyter notebooks. We propose a two prong approach in conducting the analysis. First, gather general insights and trends using a qualitative study of a smaller sample of notebooks. And then use the knowledge gained from the qualitative study to design an empirical study using a larger sample of notebooks. Computational notebooks provide a rich source of information in three formats - text, code and images. We hope to utilise existing work in image analysis and Natural Language Processing for text and code, to analyse the information present in notebooks. We hope to gain a new perspective into program comprehension and debugging in the context of ML testing.