As concepts for incorporating uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAS) into controlled airspace are being developed, the need for automated UAS traffic management (UTM) systems to guide UAS and maintain safety is becoming more apparent. A major point of concern for the implementation of UTM is how such systems could coexist alongside the human-centric air traffic management system that is already in place. The European Union’s U-space concept proposes the use of dynamic segregation of airspace reserved for UAS within the control zone. We conducted a simulation experiment with ten air traffic control officer (ATCO) volunteers to gather insights into the feasibility of tower controllers performing the dynamic segregation task. An interface prototype that supports dynamic geofencing and low-level UAS control was developed for this purpose. We found that our proposed interface design helped ATCOs detect potential conflicts between UAS and crewed aircraft. However, they were not always able to adequately resolve them, which resulted in several loss of separation events. It appears that the limitations of the dynamic segregation concept do not fit well with typical air traffic control strategies used by ATCOs. To substantiate our findings, we propose future research to investigate how to overcome the limitations of dynamic segregation to resolve tactical conflicts by revising ATCO control strategies, reevaluating their role in dynamic segregation, as well as considering the definition of flight rules and separation minima for UAS. @en

The forecasted increase in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) traffic in lower airspace raises concerns for maintaining the safety and efficiency of flight operations near towered airports. Regulatory bodies envision a collaborative interface between UAV traffic management and air traffic management to allow for coordinated operations of both systems. This study identifies the main challenges that such an environment poses for tower control. To address these challenges, an initial design for a collaborative tower control display is introduced. Remote human-in-the-loop simulations with professional air traffic controllers confirmed the usefulness of several interface elements (in particular, UAV priority and routing indications), as well as the utilization of a grid of geofences to dynamically segregate UAVs from manned aircraft. Surprisingly, the control strategy for geofence activation was similar to that of managing manned aircraft from a tower control perspective. Participants also mentioned that they would like more control over UAV traffic than initially expected. Performance could be improved by increasing predictability of UAV routing, adding conflict detection support as well as providing more authority over individual UAV locomotion supported by a tailored geofence structure. Further work is needed to investigate controller behavior in an environment that also requires control over manned traffic.

@en