This thesis delves into the intricate process of formulating an answer to the pivotal research question: "What are the design characteristics of an economic high speed nuclear container vessel?" The report systematically unfolds in six chapters, primarily focusing on a comprehensive literature study. The exploration begins with an in-depth analysis of various nuclear reactors, emphasizing aspects such as load following, capital costs, fuel expenses, operational and maintenance costs, and decommissioning expenditures. Key challenges in implementing these reactors within ship designs are scrutinized, including considerations of safety, location, and refueling intervals. Subsequently, the study investigates the intricate relationship between vessel speed and economic factors such as income, operational costs, and freight rates in liner shipping. Operational costs, especially fuel expenses, are found to significantly impact speed-dependent factors. Concurrently, the impact of speed on hull shape and propulsors is evaluated, revealing a proportional increase in wave-making resistance at higher speeds and necessitating a reevaluation of power estimation methodologies. The literature study is concluded with an assessment of three types of propulsors, where conventional propellers emerge as the preferred choice due to their efficiency, power range, and scalability. The research then starts with the economic speed determination process, vital in shaping the vessel's design. This involves constructing a resistance curve based on a volume-scaled high-speed model vessel and factoring in components like CAPEX, OPEX, voyage costs, and freight rates. The study highlights the significant influence of freight rates on speed for all cases and underscores the viability of nuclear-powered vessels in achieving higher economic speeds due to lower fuel costs, especially over extended service lives. With these foundational insights, the design process is initiated, emphasizing the optimal balance between speed, capacity, and real-world constraints. A scaled-down version of the nuclear concept vessel is developed, demonstrating a decrease in resistance while adhering to stability criteria. The resulting nuclear vessel design showcases a streamlined hull shape, minimal general arrangement alterations, and enhanced stability, with a notable preference for a three-propeller layout to optimize performance. In conclusion, this study presents a concept design for a 20,000 TEU nuclear container vessel that achieves an increased economic speed, leading to design refinements in hull shape and propulsors. The research underscores the viability of nuclear propulsion in enhancing the efficiency of container shipping, providing valuable insights for future innovations in maritime transportation.

Nuclear power is currently not a commonly used option in commercial marine applications, despite its potential for significant emission reductions. This thesis is an overview of what has been done before, and what the potential is of modern marine nuclear power applications considering the long-term goals of harmful emission reduction in the maritime industry. The concept of nuclear power is discussed, followed by the current state of nuclear power in both the shore-based, naval and the mostly historic marine application. The regulations for the marine application are noted to be outdated and require significant work for a successful application. Finally, the societal aspect of nuclear power is highlighted, as societal acceptance is not self-evident for nuclear power applications. Different developments in the field of nuclear power are addressed, with specific interest in the SMR (Small Modular Reactor), concepts that are part of the “generation IV” family, and concepts that can operate using thorium as fuel. Multiple options are considered, from the well-established PWR (Pressurized Water Reactor) to the gen IV concepts: the HTR/VHTR (high/very high temperature reactor), fast reactors in both gas-cooled, liquid-metal and sodium cooled varieties (GFR, LFR, SFR) and finally the MSR (Molten Salt Reactor). Of these the HTR/VHTR and MSR in small modular reactor form are considered the most attractive option for the marine application, due to their passive safety, high burnup, high operating temperatures, and possibilities for thorium use in the future. Criteria are established that are of importance to a marine propulsion and power generation system, establishing a framework for an implementation. Focusing on topics as: efficiency, transient loading capabilities, environmental impact, economic viability, size, and weight. For power conversion (linking the heat generation to power/electricity for the vessel) the open-cycle Brayton turbine with a heat exchanger is selected as most suitable, despite the steam turbine being more developed and projecting a possible higher efficiency. The choice for the open-cycle Brayton turbine stems from the system size and weight reduction, along with a relatively easily implementable heat rejection system for enhanced load following capabilities. The selected heat exchanger is of the helical coil type, as this is significantly more developed and proven than the PCHE. The most suitable layout is determined to be an all-electric layout, as this will greatly improve reliability (enhancing safety by redundant arrangements) and make the implementation easier applicable to a host of vessels. The electric layout allows for the combination of additional system such as batteries and emergency power. This layout is then combined with the open Brayton turbine and its heat rejection capabilities to ensure a system that is both compact as well as highly capable in performance. Finally, four suitable concept vessels were established that allowed for a like-for-like replacement with a nuclear propulsion and power generation system. This allowed for a comparison to the conventional fuel-based systems where it is shown that the implementation of nuclear power can provide very large CO2eq reductions (over 98%), while reducing size and weight if vessels of suitable size are selected. The trade-off to this reduction is the production of nuclear waste, alongside the increased upfront cost due to the high capital investment associated with nuclear power.