Extracting the cerebral anterior vessel tree of patients with an intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) is relevant to investigate potential biomarkers that can contribute to treatment decision making. The purpose of our work is to develop a method that can achieve this from routinely acquired computed tomography angiography (CTA) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) images. To this end, we regard the anterior vessel tree as a set of bifurcations and connected centerlines. The method consists of a proximal policy optimization (PPO) based deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approach for tracking centerlines, a convolutional neural network based bifurcation detector, and a breadth-first vessel tree construction approach taking the tracking and bifurcation detection results as input. We experimentally determine the added values of various components of the tracker. Both DRL vessel tracking and CNN bifurcation detection were assessed in a cross validation experiment using 115 subjects. The anterior vessel tree formation was evaluated on an independent test set of 25 subjects, and compared to interobserver variation on a small subset of images. The DRL tracking result achieves a median overlapping rate until the first error (1.8 mm off the reference standard) of 100, [46, 100] % on 8032 vessels over 115 subjects. The bifurcation detector reaches an average recall and precision of 76% and 87% respectively during the vessel tree formation process. The final vessel tree formation achieves a median recall of 68% and precision of 70%, which is in line with the interobserver agreement.

Purpose: The assessment of collateral status may depend on the timing of image acquisition. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there are optimal time points in CT Perfusion (CTP) for collateral status assessment, and compare collaterals scores at these time points with collateral scores from multiphase CT angiography (mCTA). Methods: Patients with an acute intracranial occlusion who underwent baseline non-contrast CT, mCTA and CT perfusion were selected. Collateral status was assessed using an automatically computed Collateral Ratio (CR) score in mCTA, and predefined time points in CTP acquisition. CRs extracted from CTP were correlated with CRs from mCTA. In addition, all CRs were related to baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Alberta Stoke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) with linear regression analysis to find the optimal CR. Results: In total 58 subjects (median age 74 years; interquartile range 61–83 years; 33 male) were included. When comparing the CRs from the CTP vs. mCTA acquisition, the strongest correlations were found between CR from baseline mCTA and the CR at the maximal intensity projection of time-resolved CTP (r = 0.81) and the CR at the peak of arterial enhancement point (r = 0.78). Baseline mCTA-derived CR had the highest correlation with ASPECTS (β = 0.36 (95%CI 0.11, 0.61)) and NIHSS (β = − 0.48 (95%CI − 0.72, − 0.16)). Conclusion: Collateral status assessment strongly depends on the timing of acquisition. Collateral scores obtained from mCTA imaging is close to the optimal collateral score obtained from CTP imaging.

The collateral score is an important biomarker in decision making for endovascular treatment (EVT) of patients with ischemic stroke. The existing collateral grading systems are based on visual inspection and prone to subjective interpretation and interobserver variation. The purpose of our work is the development of an automatic collateral scoring method. In this work, we present a method that is inspired by human collateral scoring. Firstly, we define an anatomical region by atlas-based registration and extract vessel structures using a deep convolutional neural network. From this, high-level features based on the ratios of vessel length and volume of the occluded and the contralateral side are defined. Multi-class classification models are used to map the feature space to a four-grade collateral score and a quantitative score. The dataset used for training, validation and testing is from a registry of images acquired in clinical routine at multiple medical centers. The model performance is tested on 269 subjects, achieving an accuracy of 0.8. The dichotomized collateral score accuracy is 0.9. The error is comparable to the interobserver variation, the results are comparable to the performance of two radiologists with 10 to 30 years of experience.