Time dependency of automated collateral scores in computed tomography angiography and computed tomography perfusion images in patients with intracranial arterial occlusion

Journal Article (2022)
Authors

Jiahang Su (Erasmus MC)

Lennard Wolff (Erasmus MC)

Pieter Jan van Doormaal (Erasmus MC)

Diederik W.J. Dippel (Erasmus MC)

Wim H. van Zwam (Maastricht University Medical Center)

W.J. Niessen (Erasmus MC, ImPhys/Computational Imaging, ImPhys/Medical Imaging)

Aad van der Lugt (Erasmus MC)

T. Walsum (Erasmus MC)

Research Group
ImPhys/Computational Imaging
Copyright
© 2022 Jiahang Su, Lennard Wolff, Pieter Jan van Doormaal, Diederik W.J. Dippel, Wim van Zwam, W.J. Niessen, Aad van der Lugt, T. van Walsum
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03050-4
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Jiahang Su, Lennard Wolff, Pieter Jan van Doormaal, Diederik W.J. Dippel, Wim van Zwam, W.J. Niessen, Aad van der Lugt, T. van Walsum
Research Group
ImPhys/Computational Imaging
Issue number
2
Volume number
65
Pages (from-to)
313-322
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03050-4
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Purpose: The assessment of collateral status may depend on the timing of image acquisition. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there are optimal time points in CT Perfusion (CTP) for collateral status assessment, and compare collaterals scores at these time points with collateral scores from multiphase CT angiography (mCTA). Methods: Patients with an acute intracranial occlusion who underwent baseline non-contrast CT, mCTA and CT perfusion were selected. Collateral status was assessed using an automatically computed Collateral Ratio (CR) score in mCTA, and predefined time points in CTP acquisition. CRs extracted from CTP were correlated with CRs from mCTA. In addition, all CRs were related to baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Alberta Stoke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) with linear regression analysis to find the optimal CR. Results: In total 58 subjects (median age 74 years; interquartile range 61–83 years; 33 male) were included. When comparing the CRs from the CTP vs. mCTA acquisition, the strongest correlations were found between CR from baseline mCTA and the CR at the maximal intensity projection of time-resolved CTP (r = 0.81) and the CR at the peak of arterial enhancement point (r = 0.78). Baseline mCTA-derived CR had the highest correlation with ASPECTS (β = 0.36 (95%CI 0.11, 0.61)) and NIHSS (β = − 0.48 (95%CI − 0.72, − 0.16)). Conclusion: Collateral status assessment strongly depends on the timing of acquisition. Collateral scores obtained from mCTA imaging is close to the optimal collateral score obtained from CTP imaging.