OA
O. Arslan
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
6 records found
1
The seismic assessment of the out-of-plane (OOP) behaviour of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings is essential since the OOP is one of the primary collapse mechanisms in URM buildings. It is influenced by several parameters, including the poor connections between structural elements, a weakness highlighted by post-earthquake observations. The paper presents a mechanical model designed to predict the contributions of various resisting mechanisms to the strength capacity of timber-joist connections in masonry cavity walls. The research presented in this paper considers two different failure modes: joist-wall interface failure, and OOP rocking behaviour of the URM walls. Consequently, two mechanical models are introduced to examine these failure modes in timber-joist connections within masonry cavity walls. One model focuses on the joist-wall interface failure, adopting a Coulomb friction model for joist-sliding further extended to incorporate the arching effect. The other model investigates the OOP rocking failure mode of walls. The combined mechanical model has been validated against the outcomes of an earlier experimental campaign conducted by the authors. The considered model can accurately predict the peak capacity of the joist connection and successfully defines the contribution of each mechanism in terms of resistance at failure.
...
The seismic assessment of the out-of-plane (OOP) behaviour of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings is essential since the OOP is one of the primary collapse mechanisms in URM buildings. It is influenced by several parameters, including the poor connections between structural elements, a weakness highlighted by post-earthquake observations. The paper presents a mechanical model designed to predict the contributions of various resisting mechanisms to the strength capacity of timber-joist connections in masonry cavity walls. The research presented in this paper considers two different failure modes: joist-wall interface failure, and OOP rocking behaviour of the URM walls. Consequently, two mechanical models are introduced to examine these failure modes in timber-joist connections within masonry cavity walls. One model focuses on the joist-wall interface failure, adopting a Coulomb friction model for joist-sliding further extended to incorporate the arching effect. The other model investigates the OOP rocking failure mode of walls. The combined mechanical model has been validated against the outcomes of an earlier experimental campaign conducted by the authors. The considered model can accurately predict the peak capacity of the joist connection and successfully defines the contribution of each mechanism in terms of resistance at failure.
Post-earthquake structural damage shows that out-of-plane wall collapse is one of the most common failure mechanisms in unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings. This also represents a critical issue in Groningen, a province located in the northern part of the Netherlands, where man-induced earthquakes have become a significant problem in recent years. Out-of-plane (OOP) failure mechanisms in brick masonry structures often stem from poor wall-to-wall, wall-to-floor or wall-to-roof connections that provide insufficient restraint and boundary conditions. Therefore, studying the mechanical behaviour of such connections is of prime importance for understanding and preventing damages and collapses in URM structures. This paper is about an experimental campaign conducted in the laboratory of the Hanze University of Applied Sciences to characterise the seismic behaviour of strengthened timber joist-masonry cavity wall connections. A total of seven URM wallets were tested, with varying strengthening configurations. Special attention is devoted to the identification of failure mechanisms and hysteretic behaviour for each group of tests performed. The experimental results showed the importance of cohesion and friction between joist and masonry, as the type of failure mechanism (sliding of the joist or rocking failure of the masonry wallet) depends on the value of these two parameters. Additionally, the interaction between the joist and the wallet activated due to rocking led to an arching effect that determined additional friction at the interface between the joist and the masonry and, therefore, increased the force capacity of the connection.
...
Post-earthquake structural damage shows that out-of-plane wall collapse is one of the most common failure mechanisms in unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings. This also represents a critical issue in Groningen, a province located in the northern part of the Netherlands, where man-induced earthquakes have become a significant problem in recent years. Out-of-plane (OOP) failure mechanisms in brick masonry structures often stem from poor wall-to-wall, wall-to-floor or wall-to-roof connections that provide insufficient restraint and boundary conditions. Therefore, studying the mechanical behaviour of such connections is of prime importance for understanding and preventing damages and collapses in URM structures. This paper is about an experimental campaign conducted in the laboratory of the Hanze University of Applied Sciences to characterise the seismic behaviour of strengthened timber joist-masonry cavity wall connections. A total of seven URM wallets were tested, with varying strengthening configurations. Special attention is devoted to the identification of failure mechanisms and hysteretic behaviour for each group of tests performed. The experimental results showed the importance of cohesion and friction between joist and masonry, as the type of failure mechanism (sliding of the joist or rocking failure of the masonry wallet) depends on the value of these two parameters. Additionally, the interaction between the joist and the wallet activated due to rocking led to an arching effect that determined additional friction at the interface between the joist and the masonry and, therefore, increased the force capacity of the connection.
Post-earthquake structural damage shows that out-of-plane (OOP) wall collapse is one of the most common failure mechanisms in unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings. This issue is particularly critical in Groningen, a province located in the northern part of the Netherlands, where low-intensity induced earthquakes have become an uprising problem in recent years. The majority of buildings in this area are constructed using URM and were not designed to withstand earthquakes, as the area had never been affected by tectonic seismic activity before. OOP failure in URM structures often stems from poor connections between structural elements, resulting in insufficient restraint to the URM walls. Therefore, investigating the mechanical behaviour of these connections is of prime importance for mitigating damages and collapses in URM structures. This paper presents the results of an experimental campaign conducted on timber joist-masonry cavity wall connections. The specimens consisted of timber joists pocketed into masonry wallets. The campaign aimed at providing a better understanding and characterisation of the cyclic axial behaviour of these connections. Both as-built and strengthened conditions were considered, with different variations, including two tie distributions, two pre-compression levels, two different as-built connections, and one strengthening solution. The experimental findings underscored that incorporating retrofitting bars not only restores the system's initial capacity but also guarantees deformation compatibility between the wall and the joist. This effectively enhances the overall deformation capacity and ductility of the timber joist-cavity wall system.
...
Post-earthquake structural damage shows that out-of-plane (OOP) wall collapse is one of the most common failure mechanisms in unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings. This issue is particularly critical in Groningen, a province located in the northern part of the Netherlands, where low-intensity induced earthquakes have become an uprising problem in recent years. The majority of buildings in this area are constructed using URM and were not designed to withstand earthquakes, as the area had never been affected by tectonic seismic activity before. OOP failure in URM structures often stems from poor connections between structural elements, resulting in insufficient restraint to the URM walls. Therefore, investigating the mechanical behaviour of these connections is of prime importance for mitigating damages and collapses in URM structures. This paper presents the results of an experimental campaign conducted on timber joist-masonry cavity wall connections. The specimens consisted of timber joists pocketed into masonry wallets. The campaign aimed at providing a better understanding and characterisation of the cyclic axial behaviour of these connections. Both as-built and strengthened conditions were considered, with different variations, including two tie distributions, two pre-compression levels, two different as-built connections, and one strengthening solution. The experimental findings underscored that incorporating retrofitting bars not only restores the system's initial capacity but also guarantees deformation compatibility between the wall and the joist. This effectively enhances the overall deformation capacity and ductility of the timber joist-cavity wall system.
Post-earthquake structural damage shows that out-of-plane wall collapse is one of the most prevalent failure mechanisms in unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings. This issue is particularly critical in Groningen, a province located in the northern part of the Netherlands, where low-intensity ground shaking has occurred since 1991 due to gas extraction. The majority of buildings in this area are constructed using URM and were not designed to withstand earthquakes, as the area had never been affected by tectonic seismic activity before. Hence, the assessment of URM buildings in the Groningen province has become of high relevance.
Out-of-plane failure mechanisms in brick masonry structures often stem from poor wall-to-wall, wall-to-floor or wall-to-roof connections that provide insufficient restraint and boundary conditions. Therefore, studying the mechanical behaviour of such connections is of prime importance for understanding and preventing damages and collapses in URM structures. Specifically, buildings with double-leaf cavity walls constitute a large portion of the building stock in the Groningen area. The connections of the leaves in cavity walls, which consist of metallic ties, are expected to play an important role. Regarding the wall-to-floor connections, the traditional way for URM structures in Dutch construction practice is either a simple masonry pocket connection or a hook anchor as-built connection, which are expected to be vulnerable to out-of-plane excitation. However, until now, little research has been carried out to characterise the seismic behaviour of connections between structural elements in traditional Dutch construction practice.
This thesis investigates the seismic behaviour of two types of connections: wall-to-wall connections between cavity wall leaves and wall-to-floor connections between the masonry cavity wall and timber diaphragm, commonly found in traditional houses in the Groningen area. The research is divided into three phases: (1) inventory of existing buildings and connections in the Groningen area, (2) performance of experimental tests, and (3) proposal and validation of numerical and mechanical models. The thesis explores the three phases as follows:
(i) An inventory of connections within URM buildings in the Groningen area is established. The inventory includes URM buildings of Groningen based on construction material, lateral load-resisting system, floor system, number of storeys, and connection details. Specific focus is given to the wall-to-wall and wall-to-floor connections in each URM building. The thickness of cavity wall leaves, the air gap between the leaves and the size and spacing of timber joists are key aspects of the inventory.
(ii) Experimental tests are performed on the most common connection typologies identified in the inventory. This phase consists of two distinct experimental campaigns:
o The first experimental campaign took place at the laboratory of the Delft University of Technology to provide a comprehensive characterisation of the axial behaviour of traditional metal tie connections in cavity walls. The campaign included a wide range of variations, such as two embedment lengths, four pre-compression levels, two different tie geometries, and five different testing protocols, including both monotonic and cyclic loading. The experimental results showed that the capacity of the wall tie connection is strongly influenced by the embedment length and the tie geometry, whereas the applied pre-compression and the loading rate do not have a significant influence.
o The second experimental campaign has been carried out at the laboratory of the Hanze University of Applied Sciences to characterise the seismic behaviour of timber joist-masonry cavity wall connections, reproducing both as-built and strengthened conditions. Twenty-two unreinforced masonry wallets were tested, with different configurations, including two tie distributions, two pre-compression levels, two different as-built connections, and two different strengthening solutions. The experimental results highlighted the importance of cohesion and friction between joist and masonry since the type of failure mechanism (sliding of the joist or rocking failure of the masonry wallet) depends on the value of these two parameters. Additionally, the interaction between the joist and the wallet and the uplift of the latter activated due to rocking led to an arching effect that increased friction at the interface between the joist and the masonry. Consequently, the arching effect enhanced the force capacity of the connection.
(iii) Mechanical and numerical models are proposed and validated against the performed experiments or other benchmarks. Mechanical and numerical models for the cavity wall tie and mechanical models for the timber joist-masonry connections were developed and verified by the experimental results to predict the failure mode and the strength capacity of the examined connections in URM buildings.
o The mechanical model for the cavity wall tie connections considers six possible failures, namely tie failure, cone break-out failure, pull-out failure, buckling failure, piercing failure and punching failure. The mechanical model is able to capture the mean peak force and the failure mode obtained from the tests. After being calibrated against the available experiments, the proposed mechanical model is used to predict the performance of untested configurations by means of parametric analyses, including higher strength of mortar for calcium silicate brick masonry, different cavity depth, different tie embedment depth, and the use of solid bricks in place of perforated clay bricks.
o The results of the experimental campaign on cavity wall ties were also utilised to calibrate a hysteretic numerical model representing the cyclic axial response of cavity wall tie connections. The proposed model uses zero-length elements implemented in OpenSees with the Pinching4 constitutive model to account for the compression-tension cyclic behaviour of the ties. The numerical model is able to capture important aspects of the tie response, such as strength degradation, unloading stiffness degradation, and pinching behaviour. The mechanical and numerical modelling approach can be easily adopted by practitioner engineers seeking to model the wall ties more accurately when assessing URM structures against earthquakes.
o The mechanical model of timber-masonry connections examines two different failure modes: joist-sliding failure mode, including joist-to-wall interaction and rocking failure mode due to joist movement. Both mechanical models have been validated against the outcomes of the experimental campaigns conducted on the corresponding connections. The mechanical model is able to estimate each contribution of the studied mechanism. Structural engineers can use the mechanical model to predict the capacity of the connection for the studied failure modes.
This research study can contribute to a better understanding of typical Groningen houses in terms of identifying the most common connections used at wall-to-wall and wall-to-floor connections in cavity walls, characterising the identified connections and proposing mechanical models for the studied connections.
...
Post-earthquake structural damage shows that out-of-plane wall collapse is one of the most prevalent failure mechanisms in unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings. This issue is particularly critical in Groningen, a province located in the northern part of the Netherlands, where low-intensity ground shaking has occurred since 1991 due to gas extraction. The majority of buildings in this area are constructed using URM and were not designed to withstand earthquakes, as the area had never been affected by tectonic seismic activity before. Hence, the assessment of URM buildings in the Groningen province has become of high relevance.
Out-of-plane failure mechanisms in brick masonry structures often stem from poor wall-to-wall, wall-to-floor or wall-to-roof connections that provide insufficient restraint and boundary conditions. Therefore, studying the mechanical behaviour of such connections is of prime importance for understanding and preventing damages and collapses in URM structures. Specifically, buildings with double-leaf cavity walls constitute a large portion of the building stock in the Groningen area. The connections of the leaves in cavity walls, which consist of metallic ties, are expected to play an important role. Regarding the wall-to-floor connections, the traditional way for URM structures in Dutch construction practice is either a simple masonry pocket connection or a hook anchor as-built connection, which are expected to be vulnerable to out-of-plane excitation. However, until now, little research has been carried out to characterise the seismic behaviour of connections between structural elements in traditional Dutch construction practice.
This thesis investigates the seismic behaviour of two types of connections: wall-to-wall connections between cavity wall leaves and wall-to-floor connections between the masonry cavity wall and timber diaphragm, commonly found in traditional houses in the Groningen area. The research is divided into three phases: (1) inventory of existing buildings and connections in the Groningen area, (2) performance of experimental tests, and (3) proposal and validation of numerical and mechanical models. The thesis explores the three phases as follows:
(i) An inventory of connections within URM buildings in the Groningen area is established. The inventory includes URM buildings of Groningen based on construction material, lateral load-resisting system, floor system, number of storeys, and connection details. Specific focus is given to the wall-to-wall and wall-to-floor connections in each URM building. The thickness of cavity wall leaves, the air gap between the leaves and the size and spacing of timber joists are key aspects of the inventory.
(ii) Experimental tests are performed on the most common connection typologies identified in the inventory. This phase consists of two distinct experimental campaigns:
o The first experimental campaign took place at the laboratory of the Delft University of Technology to provide a comprehensive characterisation of the axial behaviour of traditional metal tie connections in cavity walls. The campaign included a wide range of variations, such as two embedment lengths, four pre-compression levels, two different tie geometries, and five different testing protocols, including both monotonic and cyclic loading. The experimental results showed that the capacity of the wall tie connection is strongly influenced by the embedment length and the tie geometry, whereas the applied pre-compression and the loading rate do not have a significant influence.
o The second experimental campaign has been carried out at the laboratory of the Hanze University of Applied Sciences to characterise the seismic behaviour of timber joist-masonry cavity wall connections, reproducing both as-built and strengthened conditions. Twenty-two unreinforced masonry wallets were tested, with different configurations, including two tie distributions, two pre-compression levels, two different as-built connections, and two different strengthening solutions. The experimental results highlighted the importance of cohesion and friction between joist and masonry since the type of failure mechanism (sliding of the joist or rocking failure of the masonry wallet) depends on the value of these two parameters. Additionally, the interaction between the joist and the wallet and the uplift of the latter activated due to rocking led to an arching effect that increased friction at the interface between the joist and the masonry. Consequently, the arching effect enhanced the force capacity of the connection.
(iii) Mechanical and numerical models are proposed and validated against the performed experiments or other benchmarks. Mechanical and numerical models for the cavity wall tie and mechanical models for the timber joist-masonry connections were developed and verified by the experimental results to predict the failure mode and the strength capacity of the examined connections in URM buildings.
o The mechanical model for the cavity wall tie connections considers six possible failures, namely tie failure, cone break-out failure, pull-out failure, buckling failure, piercing failure and punching failure. The mechanical model is able to capture the mean peak force and the failure mode obtained from the tests. After being calibrated against the available experiments, the proposed mechanical model is used to predict the performance of untested configurations by means of parametric analyses, including higher strength of mortar for calcium silicate brick masonry, different cavity depth, different tie embedment depth, and the use of solid bricks in place of perforated clay bricks.
o The results of the experimental campaign on cavity wall ties were also utilised to calibrate a hysteretic numerical model representing the cyclic axial response of cavity wall tie connections. The proposed model uses zero-length elements implemented in OpenSees with the Pinching4 constitutive model to account for the compression-tension cyclic behaviour of the ties. The numerical model is able to capture important aspects of the tie response, such as strength degradation, unloading stiffness degradation, and pinching behaviour. The mechanical and numerical modelling approach can be easily adopted by practitioner engineers seeking to model the wall ties more accurately when assessing URM structures against earthquakes.
o The mechanical model of timber-masonry connections examines two different failure modes: joist-sliding failure mode, including joist-to-wall interaction and rocking failure mode due to joist movement. Both mechanical models have been validated against the outcomes of the experimental campaigns conducted on the corresponding connections. The mechanical model is able to estimate each contribution of the studied mechanism. Structural engineers can use the mechanical model to predict the capacity of the connection for the studied failure modes.
This research study can contribute to a better understanding of typical Groningen houses in terms of identifying the most common connections used at wall-to-wall and wall-to-floor connections in cavity walls, characterising the identified connections and proposing mechanical models for the studied connections.
In recent years, the number of human-induced earthquakes in Groningen, a large gas field in the north of the Netherlands, has increased. The majority of the buildings are built by using unreinforced masonry (URM), most of which consists of cavity (i.e. two-leaf) walls, and were not designed to withstand earthquakes. Efforts to define, test and standardize the metal ties, which do play an important role, are valuable also from the wider construction industry point of view. The presented study exhibits findings on the behavior of the metal tie connections between the masonry leaves often used in Dutch construction practice, but also elsewhere around the world. An experimental campaign has been carried out at Delft University of Technology to provide a complete characterization of the axial behavior of traditional connections in cavity walls. A large number of variations was considered in this research: two embedment lengths, four pre-compression levels, two different tie geometries, and five different testing protocols, including monotonic and cyclic loading. The experimental results showed that the capacity of the connection was strongly influenced by the embedment length and the geometry of the tie, whereas the applied pre-compression and the loading rate did not have a significant influence.
...
In recent years, the number of human-induced earthquakes in Groningen, a large gas field in the north of the Netherlands, has increased. The majority of the buildings are built by using unreinforced masonry (URM), most of which consists of cavity (i.e. two-leaf) walls, and were not designed to withstand earthquakes. Efforts to define, test and standardize the metal ties, which do play an important role, are valuable also from the wider construction industry point of view. The presented study exhibits findings on the behavior of the metal tie connections between the masonry leaves often used in Dutch construction practice, but also elsewhere around the world. An experimental campaign has been carried out at Delft University of Technology to provide a complete characterization of the axial behavior of traditional connections in cavity walls. A large number of variations was considered in this research: two embedment lengths, four pre-compression levels, two different tie geometries, and five different testing protocols, including monotonic and cyclic loading. The experimental results showed that the capacity of the connection was strongly influenced by the embedment length and the geometry of the tie, whereas the applied pre-compression and the loading rate did not have a significant influence.
The seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings with cavity walls is a relevant issue in many countries, such as in Central and Northern Europe, Australia, New Zealand, China and several other countries. A cavity wall consists of two separate parallel masonry walls (called leaves) connected by metal ties: an inner loadbearing wall and an outer veneer having mostly aesthetic and insulating functions. Cavity walls are particularly vulnerable structural elements. If the two leaves of the cavity wall are not properly connected, their out-of-plane strength may be significantly smaller than that of an equivalent solid wall with the same thickness. The research presented in this paper focuses on a mechanical model developed to predict the failure mode and the strength capacity of metal tie connections in masonry cavity walls. The model considers six possible failures, namely tie failure, cone break-out failure, pull-out failure, buckling failure, piercing failure and punching failure. Tie failure is a predictable quantity when the possible failure modes can be captured. The mechanical model for the ties has been validated against the outcomes of an experimental campaign conducted earlier by the authors. The mechanical model is able to capture the mean peak force and the failure mode obtained from the tests. The mechanical model can be easily adopted by practising engineers who aim to model the wall ties accurately in order to assess the strength and behaviour of the structures against earthquakes. Furthermore, the proposed mechanical model is used to extrapolate the experimental results to untested configurations, by performing parametric analyses on key parameters including a higher strength mortar of the calcium silicate brick masonry, a different cavity depth, a different tie embedment depth, and solid versus perforated clay bricks.
...
The seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings with cavity walls is a relevant issue in many countries, such as in Central and Northern Europe, Australia, New Zealand, China and several other countries. A cavity wall consists of two separate parallel masonry walls (called leaves) connected by metal ties: an inner loadbearing wall and an outer veneer having mostly aesthetic and insulating functions. Cavity walls are particularly vulnerable structural elements. If the two leaves of the cavity wall are not properly connected, their out-of-plane strength may be significantly smaller than that of an equivalent solid wall with the same thickness. The research presented in this paper focuses on a mechanical model developed to predict the failure mode and the strength capacity of metal tie connections in masonry cavity walls. The model considers six possible failures, namely tie failure, cone break-out failure, pull-out failure, buckling failure, piercing failure and punching failure. Tie failure is a predictable quantity when the possible failure modes can be captured. The mechanical model for the ties has been validated against the outcomes of an experimental campaign conducted earlier by the authors. The mechanical model is able to capture the mean peak force and the failure mode obtained from the tests. The mechanical model can be easily adopted by practising engineers who aim to model the wall ties accurately in order to assess the strength and behaviour of the structures against earthquakes. Furthermore, the proposed mechanical model is used to extrapolate the experimental results to untested configurations, by performing parametric analyses on key parameters including a higher strength mortar of the calcium silicate brick masonry, a different cavity depth, a different tie embedment depth, and solid versus perforated clay bricks.