MZ
Marcelo Zaiat
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
2 records found
1
Journal article
(2024)
-
Beatriz Egerland Bueno, André Luiz Muniz Brito, Victor S. Garcia Rea, Rifki Wahyu Kurnianto, Marcelo Zaiat, Jules B. van Lier
Vinasse, a by-product of ethanol production, is generated at significant rates. While rich in nutrients such as calcium, magnesium, and potassium, its high solids, organic matter, acidity, and sulfate content pose challenges when disposed directly on soil, necessitating treatment. Anaerobic digestion is a viable solution, reducing organic pollution while recovering energy in the form of biogas, aligning with the biorefinery concept. Traditionally, sludge bed reactors and anaerobic contact reactors are utilized for vinasse processing, with sludge granulation being vital for treatment success. However, challenges such as sludge wash-out due to recalcitrant compounds, high solids concentration in the influent, low pH, salinity, and temperature hinder granule formation. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) offer an alternative, simplifying treatment by integrating intensified pre- and post-treatment units. Due to complete sludge retention, AnMBRs achieve high COD removal efficiencies, yielding a suspended solids-free and largely disinfected effluent. Therefore, AnMBRs show promise for vinasse treatment, eliminating the need for sludge granulation and producing nutrient-rich effluent with minimal residual organics and suspended solids. In this study, an AnMBR equipped with an inside-out external crossflow ultrafiltration membrane was proposed for the treatment of vinasse. The AnMBR reached a COD removal efficiency of 95% ± 2.6% and produced 0.3 CH4 L. g COD removed -1 working at organic loading rates of 8 g COD. L-1 d-1 and membrane fluxes of 10 LMH. At organic loading rates of 10 g COD. L-1 d-1 and fluxes of 12 and 14 LMH, the COD removal efficiency decreased to 77% ± 11% and 73% ± 7.9%, respectively. The AnMBR technology represents an innovation for wastewater treatment, however, more research using the cross-flow configuration and different types of effluents is needed. Literature studies that address the treatment of sugar beet or sugarcane vinasse using AnMBR are still scarce. This study explored the potentials of AnMBR technology for vinasse treatment and contributes to the dissemination of this technology, opening new possibilities for vinasse processing.
...
Vinasse, a by-product of ethanol production, is generated at significant rates. While rich in nutrients such as calcium, magnesium, and potassium, its high solids, organic matter, acidity, and sulfate content pose challenges when disposed directly on soil, necessitating treatment. Anaerobic digestion is a viable solution, reducing organic pollution while recovering energy in the form of biogas, aligning with the biorefinery concept. Traditionally, sludge bed reactors and anaerobic contact reactors are utilized for vinasse processing, with sludge granulation being vital for treatment success. However, challenges such as sludge wash-out due to recalcitrant compounds, high solids concentration in the influent, low pH, salinity, and temperature hinder granule formation. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) offer an alternative, simplifying treatment by integrating intensified pre- and post-treatment units. Due to complete sludge retention, AnMBRs achieve high COD removal efficiencies, yielding a suspended solids-free and largely disinfected effluent. Therefore, AnMBRs show promise for vinasse treatment, eliminating the need for sludge granulation and producing nutrient-rich effluent with minimal residual organics and suspended solids. In this study, an AnMBR equipped with an inside-out external crossflow ultrafiltration membrane was proposed for the treatment of vinasse. The AnMBR reached a COD removal efficiency of 95% ± 2.6% and produced 0.3 CH4 L. g COD removed -1 working at organic loading rates of 8 g COD. L-1 d-1 and membrane fluxes of 10 LMH. At organic loading rates of 10 g COD. L-1 d-1 and fluxes of 12 and 14 LMH, the COD removal efficiency decreased to 77% ± 11% and 73% ± 7.9%, respectively. The AnMBR technology represents an innovation for wastewater treatment, however, more research using the cross-flow configuration and different types of effluents is needed. Literature studies that address the treatment of sugar beet or sugarcane vinasse using AnMBR are still scarce. This study explored the potentials of AnMBR technology for vinasse treatment and contributes to the dissemination of this technology, opening new possibilities for vinasse processing.
Treatment of sugarcane vinasse in AnMBR and UASB
Process performance and microbial community comparison
Journal article
(2024)
-
Beatriz Egerland Bueno, Victor S. Garcia Rea, Flávia Talarico Saia, Gustavo Bueno Gregoraccid, Gustavo Dacanal, J.B. van Lier, Marcelo Zaiat
Vinasse is a by-product of sugarcane processing which is often used in fertigation; however, the direct use of vinasse harms the environment and reduces soil productivity due to its physicochemical properties. Anaerobic digestion (AD) offers an alternative to mitigate part of the negative effects. Anaerobic high-rate reactors, which mainly rely on sludge granulation, are mostly used in AD of vinasse wastewater. However, the composition of vinasse such as high concentration of solids and organic matter, high salinity, low pH, and high concentrations of sulfate, affect granule formation, leading to sludge washout. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) present an alternative for vinasse treatment, eliminating the need for sludge granulation and producing a nutrient-rich effluent with minimal residual organics and no suspended solids. Research on sugarcane vinasse treatment using AnMBRs is limited. Most studies have employed submerged internal membrane modules, highlighting the need for further research with different reactor configurations to enhance process performance. In this study, an AnMBR equipped with an external inside-out crossflow ultrafiltration membrane was compared to an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor for the treatment of sugarcane vinasse. At a volumetric organic loading rate of up to 6 g COD. L-1.d-1, the UASB reactor reached 75% ± 7% of COD removal efficiency whereas the AnMBR generated a solids-free effluent and reached 88% ± 2% of COD removal efficiency. Microorganisms such as Clostridia, Bacteroidia, Mesotaga, Syner-01, Dehalococcoidia, Bacteroidia-DMER64, and Methanolinea were found as the most abundant. The results highlight the AnMBR potential as an effective alternative for treating sugarcane vinasse while overcoming the challenges posed by unsatisfactory sludge granulation.
...
Vinasse is a by-product of sugarcane processing which is often used in fertigation; however, the direct use of vinasse harms the environment and reduces soil productivity due to its physicochemical properties. Anaerobic digestion (AD) offers an alternative to mitigate part of the negative effects. Anaerobic high-rate reactors, which mainly rely on sludge granulation, are mostly used in AD of vinasse wastewater. However, the composition of vinasse such as high concentration of solids and organic matter, high salinity, low pH, and high concentrations of sulfate, affect granule formation, leading to sludge washout. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) present an alternative for vinasse treatment, eliminating the need for sludge granulation and producing a nutrient-rich effluent with minimal residual organics and no suspended solids. Research on sugarcane vinasse treatment using AnMBRs is limited. Most studies have employed submerged internal membrane modules, highlighting the need for further research with different reactor configurations to enhance process performance. In this study, an AnMBR equipped with an external inside-out crossflow ultrafiltration membrane was compared to an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor for the treatment of sugarcane vinasse. At a volumetric organic loading rate of up to 6 g COD. L-1.d-1, the UASB reactor reached 75% ± 7% of COD removal efficiency whereas the AnMBR generated a solids-free effluent and reached 88% ± 2% of COD removal efficiency. Microorganisms such as Clostridia, Bacteroidia, Mesotaga, Syner-01, Dehalococcoidia, Bacteroidia-DMER64, and Methanolinea were found as the most abundant. The results highlight the AnMBR potential as an effective alternative for treating sugarcane vinasse while overcoming the challenges posed by unsatisfactory sludge granulation.