The rise of ChatGPT has prompted concerns over users’ agency when revealing personal data to artificial intelligence. This study examined users’ likelihood of disclosing their data to ChatGPT in physical and mental health scenarios. Participants (N = 216) completed a repeated measures survey where they viewed four vignettes of hypothetical scenarios and were asked to imagine disclosing health information (physical and mental health) at two sensitivity levels (low and high self-disclosure). A repeated measures ANOVA revealed participants were significantly more likely to provide their data when the information required low-disclosure than high-disclosure. Furthermore, participants were significantly more likely to report uploading their health information in the physical health scenario than in the mental health scenario. The findings suggest ChatGPT users exercise caution in disclosing data to the platform. Reluctance to upload information in sensitive scenarios reduces the training data for large language models, resulting in potential stagnation in technology development.

The rise of ChatGPT has emphasized the need for an improved conceptual understanding of users’ agency when interacting with artificial intelligence (AI) systems for healthcare. Australian ChatGPT users (N = 216) completed a repeated measures online survey. Hierarchical regression analyses assessed the influence of demographic factors (age and gender), Technology Acceptance Model constructs (perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use), and extended variables (trust, privacy concerns) on users' behavioral intentions to use ChatGPT for physical and mental healthcare. The proposed model was partially supported: the findings emphasized the need to establish user trust in ChatGPT and its perceived usefulness in both areas of healthcare. Privacy concerns were a significant predictor of intentions to use ChatGPT for mental healthcare with perceived ease of use predicting intentions to use ChatGPT for physical healthcare. The findings indicate predictors of uses of AI cannot be generalized across healthcare types and unique drivers should be considered.

Participatory data stewardship (PDS) empowers individuals to shape and govern their data via responsible collection and use. As artificial intelligence (AI) requires massive amounts of data, research must assess what factors predict consumers’ willingness to provide their data to AI. This mixed-methods study applied the extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with additional predictors of trust and subjective norms. Participants’ data donation profile was also measured to assess the influence of individuals’ social duty, understanding of the purpose and guilt. Participants (N = 322) completed an experimental survey. Individuals were willing to provide data to AI via PDS when they believed it was their social duty, understood the purpose and trusted AI. However, the TAM may not be a complete model for assessing user willingness. This study establishes that individuals value the importance of trusting and comprehending the broader societal impact of AI when providing their data to AI. Practitioner summary: To build responsible and representative AI, individuals are needed to participate in data stewardship. The factors driving willingness to participate in such methods were studied via an online survey. Trust, social duty and understanding the purpose significantly predicted willingness to provide data to AI via participatory data stewardship.