Land subsidence is a complicated phenomenon, relevant in the Holocene coastal-plain of the Netherlands, that can be triggered by many different mechanisms and components. To cope with the effects of land subsidence, detailed information on which mechanisms are causing subsidence and its variation over time and space are needed. Subsidence studies predominantly focus on grass and agricultural areas with organic soils above the groundwater level. In this study, subsidence is also evaluated for dikes and the urban environment. It is attempted to model subsidence behaviour of four different projects, grass plots within the Krimpenerwaard polder, locations along the N3 Dordrecht, an embankment constructed for the A5 Badhoevedorp and locations along the Markermeerdikes, and to verify these model results with subsidence measurements available. Existing one-dimensional models for different subsidence components are used in the evaluations. For grass and agricultural areas it is found that subsidence behaviour could be modelled and the results lie within the range of uncertainty of the subsidence measurements used. However, the equations used are often empirical and do not include all relevant influencing factors and couplings. Compression by degradation of organic material as a response to drainage of organic soil is the main subsidence component in these areas. Anaerobic degradation of organic material is also included in the modelling approach, a component that is often neglected in other subsidence studies. Two infrastructure related projects provided insight to subsidence components in the urban environment. Compression by loading is the main subsidence component relevant in this area type, and thus settlement models are suitable to approximate the subsidence behaviour. However, a slight underestimation of creep shows that the existence of a small additional subsidence component for a situation with soft soil layers pushed below the water table could not be excluded. Unravelling subsidence behaviour from dikes showed to be more complicated, where an interplay between different components is relevant. Based on the evaluation in this study compression by loading and compression by an oxidation or shrinkage component are indicated the main subsidence components. Many uncertainties and assumptions used in this evaluation influenced the results. For all area types disentangling subsidence into contributions of separate components based on a total measured subsidence signal causes large uncertainties, as modelled subsidence contributions for individual components could not be verified.