V. Monna
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
2 records found
1
Towards Positional Citizenship
designing for the More-than-Human Political
“We have never been modern” wrote Bruno Latour, proposing that the dualism between nature and society has represented a convenient fiction. If humans have never genuinely stood apart, what happens to one of its most anthropocentric fabrications, citizenship? Conventionally a marker of political agency, citizenship determines who can speak, act, and belong. This conceptualisation excludes the multiple more-than-human agents shaping collective experiences. Building upon Plessner’s concept of positionality, the paper introduces “Positional Citizenship” to transcend the Cartesian divide between humans and more-than-humans, reshaping the political as a relational space of co-presence. Building on this shift, design becomes a practice of relational reconfiguration, making these distributed agencies visible and actionable. This paper outlines mechanisms facilitating this transformation: unlearning Western ontologies of mastery; integrating indigenous epistemologies of interdependence; recognising non-human entities as agents; cultivating material ethics and care; translating institutional and infrastructural assemblages; and working within interstitial ecologies where hybrid forms emerge.
...
“We have never been modern” wrote Bruno Latour, proposing that the dualism between nature and society has represented a convenient fiction. If humans have never genuinely stood apart, what happens to one of its most anthropocentric fabrications, citizenship? Conventionally a marker of political agency, citizenship determines who can speak, act, and belong. This conceptualisation excludes the multiple more-than-human agents shaping collective experiences. Building upon Plessner’s concept of positionality, the paper introduces “Positional Citizenship” to transcend the Cartesian divide between humans and more-than-humans, reshaping the political as a relational space of co-presence. Building on this shift, design becomes a practice of relational reconfiguration, making these distributed agencies visible and actionable. This paper outlines mechanisms facilitating this transformation: unlearning Western ontologies of mastery; integrating indigenous epistemologies of interdependence; recognising non-human entities as agents; cultivating material ethics and care; translating institutional and infrastructural assemblages; and working within interstitial ecologies where hybrid forms emerge.
Beyond Dialogue
Reflexive, Reciprocal, and Inclusive Loops for Participatory Justice
Contemporary participation in sustainability transitions often operates under efficiency imperatives, with budget and time as scarce resources. Participation becomes a top-down, streamlined practice of extractive consultation, techno-economic reductionism, and the absence of loops that return learning, accountability, or value to communities. This results in low engagement, with outcomes reduced to collective acceptance of one-size-fits-all solutions rather than the co-creation of diverse practices that bring together multiple societal perspectives. This paper explores how participatory design can transform this paradigm by advancing a collective reflexive practice in which engagement becomes a continuous, justice-oriented process. It introduces the concept of reflexive, reciprocal, and inclusive loops, a design logic for reconfiguring participation as loop-driven and continual rather than episodic and discrete, where communities and institutions sense, interpret, act, and cultivate self-awareness together. Building on justice-oriented design theory, we articulate a loop-driven participation framework structured around the principle of reflexivity as an act of collective self-awareness to detect and repair injustices around: inclusivity, ensuring equitable voice and fair distribution of benefits and burdens, and reciprocity, establishing non-extractive exchanges of knowledge, responsibility, and value. We argue that realizing this framework requires a reframing of digital technologies from decontextualised instruments of participation to socio-digital infrastructures that actively mediate relationships, redistribute power, and expand collective capabilities. Such infrastructures must be co-created, open, and accessible, enabling communities to model, simulate, and assess inclusive and reciprocal scenarios across domains like energy, mobility, and biodiversity. The paper contributes formative concepts and design heuristics for structuring participatory processes that embody reflexivity through inclusive and reciprocal loops reimagining participatory design as a process of ethical coexistence, where dialogue becomes a continual and processual infrastructure of care and justice, rather than a one-off event.
...
Contemporary participation in sustainability transitions often operates under efficiency imperatives, with budget and time as scarce resources. Participation becomes a top-down, streamlined practice of extractive consultation, techno-economic reductionism, and the absence of loops that return learning, accountability, or value to communities. This results in low engagement, with outcomes reduced to collective acceptance of one-size-fits-all solutions rather than the co-creation of diverse practices that bring together multiple societal perspectives. This paper explores how participatory design can transform this paradigm by advancing a collective reflexive practice in which engagement becomes a continuous, justice-oriented process. It introduces the concept of reflexive, reciprocal, and inclusive loops, a design logic for reconfiguring participation as loop-driven and continual rather than episodic and discrete, where communities and institutions sense, interpret, act, and cultivate self-awareness together. Building on justice-oriented design theory, we articulate a loop-driven participation framework structured around the principle of reflexivity as an act of collective self-awareness to detect and repair injustices around: inclusivity, ensuring equitable voice and fair distribution of benefits and burdens, and reciprocity, establishing non-extractive exchanges of knowledge, responsibility, and value. We argue that realizing this framework requires a reframing of digital technologies from decontextualised instruments of participation to socio-digital infrastructures that actively mediate relationships, redistribute power, and expand collective capabilities. Such infrastructures must be co-created, open, and accessible, enabling communities to model, simulate, and assess inclusive and reciprocal scenarios across domains like energy, mobility, and biodiversity. The paper contributes formative concepts and design heuristics for structuring participatory processes that embody reflexivity through inclusive and reciprocal loops reimagining participatory design as a process of ethical coexistence, where dialogue becomes a continual and processual infrastructure of care and justice, rather than a one-off event.