Id
Itziar de Rojas
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
3 records found
1
Genetic testing of common and rare variants in dementia patients from a memory clinic
Dementia-related genetic testing in memory clinic
Journal article
(2025)
-
Itziar de Rojas, Marc Hulsman, Niccoló Tesi, Rosalina M.L. van Spaendonk, Jetske van der Schaar, Janna I.R. Dijkstra, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Marcel T. Reinders, Sven J. van der Lee, More authors...
Background
Many types of dementia have high heritability, which creates opportunities for DNA diagnostics. Clinicians sporadically test for causal genetic variants. However, in addition to causal genetic mutations, an increasing number of both common and rare risk factors are being identified, especially for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Here, we describe and evaluate diagnostic performance of combining genetic risk factors for AD to assist memory clinic clinicians.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of 998 consecutive patients (mean age 62.1, 40.3% females, 63.3% dementia) was conducted over 2.5 years in a Dutch memory clinic. The patients underwent a complete genetic risk assessment, including whole-exome sequencing and array genotyping. We examined known pathogenic genetic variants for all dementia types and their correlation with clinical diagnoses. We evaluated a combined genetic score (GS) based on all genetic risk factors for AD - namely APOE genotypes, candidate risk rare variants in 11 genes, and a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 82 common variants. Then, we analyzed the discriminatory characteristics of the GS.
Results
Causal pathogenic variants were rare, present in 3.4% of individuals, but genetic testing would have altered the diagnosis in over half of the carriers. Candidate rare risk variants were more common, identified in 31.6% of patients. Both APOE genotypes and the PRS were independently associated with AD, and gene-specific interaction was found between TREM2 and AD-PRS (β = -1.16, p = 0.015). Patients with a high GS were 7 times more likely receive an AD diagnosis compared to those with a low GS (p = 2.5E-07).
Conclusion
Overall, this study highlights the potential of integrating genetic risk factors into clinical practice to enhance AD diagnosis, though the improvement in diagnostic accuracy was moderate. The findings underscore the importance of genetic testing in diagnosis while also recognizing its limitations. ...
Many types of dementia have high heritability, which creates opportunities for DNA diagnostics. Clinicians sporadically test for causal genetic variants. However, in addition to causal genetic mutations, an increasing number of both common and rare risk factors are being identified, especially for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Here, we describe and evaluate diagnostic performance of combining genetic risk factors for AD to assist memory clinic clinicians.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of 998 consecutive patients (mean age 62.1, 40.3% females, 63.3% dementia) was conducted over 2.5 years in a Dutch memory clinic. The patients underwent a complete genetic risk assessment, including whole-exome sequencing and array genotyping. We examined known pathogenic genetic variants for all dementia types and their correlation with clinical diagnoses. We evaluated a combined genetic score (GS) based on all genetic risk factors for AD - namely APOE genotypes, candidate risk rare variants in 11 genes, and a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 82 common variants. Then, we analyzed the discriminatory characteristics of the GS.
Results
Causal pathogenic variants were rare, present in 3.4% of individuals, but genetic testing would have altered the diagnosis in over half of the carriers. Candidate rare risk variants were more common, identified in 31.6% of patients. Both APOE genotypes and the PRS were independently associated with AD, and gene-specific interaction was found between TREM2 and AD-PRS (β = -1.16, p = 0.015). Patients with a high GS were 7 times more likely receive an AD diagnosis compared to those with a low GS (p = 2.5E-07).
Conclusion
Overall, this study highlights the potential of integrating genetic risk factors into clinical practice to enhance AD diagnosis, though the improvement in diagnostic accuracy was moderate. The findings underscore the importance of genetic testing in diagnosis while also recognizing its limitations. ...
Background
Many types of dementia have high heritability, which creates opportunities for DNA diagnostics. Clinicians sporadically test for causal genetic variants. However, in addition to causal genetic mutations, an increasing number of both common and rare risk factors are being identified, especially for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Here, we describe and evaluate diagnostic performance of combining genetic risk factors for AD to assist memory clinic clinicians.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of 998 consecutive patients (mean age 62.1, 40.3% females, 63.3% dementia) was conducted over 2.5 years in a Dutch memory clinic. The patients underwent a complete genetic risk assessment, including whole-exome sequencing and array genotyping. We examined known pathogenic genetic variants for all dementia types and their correlation with clinical diagnoses. We evaluated a combined genetic score (GS) based on all genetic risk factors for AD - namely APOE genotypes, candidate risk rare variants in 11 genes, and a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 82 common variants. Then, we analyzed the discriminatory characteristics of the GS.
Results
Causal pathogenic variants were rare, present in 3.4% of individuals, but genetic testing would have altered the diagnosis in over half of the carriers. Candidate rare risk variants were more common, identified in 31.6% of patients. Both APOE genotypes and the PRS were independently associated with AD, and gene-specific interaction was found between TREM2 and AD-PRS (β = -1.16, p = 0.015). Patients with a high GS were 7 times more likely receive an AD diagnosis compared to those with a low GS (p = 2.5E-07).
Conclusion
Overall, this study highlights the potential of integrating genetic risk factors into clinical practice to enhance AD diagnosis, though the improvement in diagnostic accuracy was moderate. The findings underscore the importance of genetic testing in diagnosis while also recognizing its limitations.
Many types of dementia have high heritability, which creates opportunities for DNA diagnostics. Clinicians sporadically test for causal genetic variants. However, in addition to causal genetic mutations, an increasing number of both common and rare risk factors are being identified, especially for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Here, we describe and evaluate diagnostic performance of combining genetic risk factors for AD to assist memory clinic clinicians.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of 998 consecutive patients (mean age 62.1, 40.3% females, 63.3% dementia) was conducted over 2.5 years in a Dutch memory clinic. The patients underwent a complete genetic risk assessment, including whole-exome sequencing and array genotyping. We examined known pathogenic genetic variants for all dementia types and their correlation with clinical diagnoses. We evaluated a combined genetic score (GS) based on all genetic risk factors for AD - namely APOE genotypes, candidate risk rare variants in 11 genes, and a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 82 common variants. Then, we analyzed the discriminatory characteristics of the GS.
Results
Causal pathogenic variants were rare, present in 3.4% of individuals, but genetic testing would have altered the diagnosis in over half of the carriers. Candidate rare risk variants were more common, identified in 31.6% of patients. Both APOE genotypes and the PRS were independently associated with AD, and gene-specific interaction was found between TREM2 and AD-PRS (β = -1.16, p = 0.015). Patients with a high GS were 7 times more likely receive an AD diagnosis compared to those with a low GS (p = 2.5E-07).
Conclusion
Overall, this study highlights the potential of integrating genetic risk factors into clinical practice to enhance AD diagnosis, though the improvement in diagnostic accuracy was moderate. The findings underscore the importance of genetic testing in diagnosis while also recognizing its limitations.
Journal article
(2025)
-
Aude Nicolas, Richard Sherva, Benjamin Grenier-Boley, Yoontae Kim, Masataka Kikuchi, Jigyasha Timsina, Itziar de Rojas, Marcel J.T. Reinders, Jean-Charles Lambert, More authors...
A polygenic score (PGS) for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) was derived recently from data on genome-wide significant loci in European ancestry populations. We applied this PGS to populations in 17 European countries and observed a consistent association with the AD risk, age at onset and cerebrospinal fluid levels of AD biomarkers, independently of apolipoprotein E locus (APOE). This PGS was also associated with the AD risk in many other populations of diverse ancestries. A cross-ancestry polygenic risk score improved the association with the AD risk in most of the multiancestry populations tested when the APOE region was included. Finally, we found that the PGS/polygenic risk score captured AD-specific information because the association weakened as the diagnosis was broadened. In conclusion, a simple PGS captures the AD-specific genetic information that is common to populations of different ancestries, although studies of more diverse populations are still needed to better characterize the genetics of AD.
...
A polygenic score (PGS) for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) was derived recently from data on genome-wide significant loci in European ancestry populations. We applied this PGS to populations in 17 European countries and observed a consistent association with the AD risk, age at onset and cerebrospinal fluid levels of AD biomarkers, independently of apolipoprotein E locus (APOE). This PGS was also associated with the AD risk in many other populations of diverse ancestries. A cross-ancestry polygenic risk score improved the association with the AD risk in most of the multiancestry populations tested when the APOE region was included. Finally, we found that the PGS/polygenic risk score captured AD-specific information because the association weakened as the diagnosis was broadened. In conclusion, a simple PGS captures the AD-specific genetic information that is common to populations of different ancestries, although studies of more diverse populations are still needed to better characterize the genetics of AD.
Journal article
(2023)
-
Emily Baker, Ganna Leonenko, Karl Michael Schmidt, Matthew Hill, Amanda J. Myers, Maryam Shoai, Itziar de Rojas, Niccoló Tesi, Henne Holstege, More Authors...
Introduction Both late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and ageing have a strong genetic component. In each case, many associated variants have been discovered, but how much missing heritability remains to be discovered is debated. Variability in the estimation of SNP-based heritability could explain the differences in reported heritability. Methods We compute heritability in five large independent cohorts (N = 7,396, 1,566, 803, 12,528 and 3,963) to determine whether a consensus for the AD heritability estimate can be reached. These cohorts vary by sample size, age of cases and controls and phenotype definition. We compute heritability a) for all SNPs, b) excluding APOE region, c) excluding both APOE and genome-wide association study hit regions, and d) SNPs overlapping a microglia gene-set. Results SNP-based heritability of late onset Alzheimer’s disease is between 38 and 66% when age and genetic disease architecture are correctly accounted for. The heritability estimates decrease by 12% [SD = 8%] on average when the APOE region is excluded and an additional 1% [SD = 3%] when genome-wide significant regions were removed. A microglia gene-set explains 69–84% of our estimates of SNP-based heritability using only 3% of total SNPs in all cohorts. Conclusion The heritability of neurodegenerative disorders cannot be represented as a single number, because it is dependent on the ages of cases and controls. Genome-wide association studies pick up a large proportion of total AD heritability when age and genetic architecture are correctly accounted for. Around 13% of SNP-based heritability can be explained by known genetic loci and the remaining heritability likely resides around microglial related genes.
...
Introduction Both late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and ageing have a strong genetic component. In each case, many associated variants have been discovered, but how much missing heritability remains to be discovered is debated. Variability in the estimation of SNP-based heritability could explain the differences in reported heritability. Methods We compute heritability in five large independent cohorts (N = 7,396, 1,566, 803, 12,528 and 3,963) to determine whether a consensus for the AD heritability estimate can be reached. These cohorts vary by sample size, age of cases and controls and phenotype definition. We compute heritability a) for all SNPs, b) excluding APOE region, c) excluding both APOE and genome-wide association study hit regions, and d) SNPs overlapping a microglia gene-set. Results SNP-based heritability of late onset Alzheimer’s disease is between 38 and 66% when age and genetic disease architecture are correctly accounted for. The heritability estimates decrease by 12% [SD = 8%] on average when the APOE region is excluded and an additional 1% [SD = 3%] when genome-wide significant regions were removed. A microglia gene-set explains 69–84% of our estimates of SNP-based heritability using only 3% of total SNPs in all cohorts. Conclusion The heritability of neurodegenerative disorders cannot be represented as a single number, because it is dependent on the ages of cases and controls. Genome-wide association studies pick up a large proportion of total AD heritability when age and genetic architecture are correctly accounted for. Around 13% of SNP-based heritability can be explained by known genetic loci and the remaining heritability likely resides around microglial related genes.