Background Accurate quantification of iodine uptake is essential for performing pre-treatment dosimetry of ¹³¹I therapy after redifferentiation of radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer. Standardized procedures for ¹²⁴I PET/CT-based dosimetry are currently lacking. We aim to evaluate the relation between ¹⁸F and ¹²⁴I imaging for two different PET/CT scanners, the effect of bias correction on recovery across scanners and investigate the impact of clinically-encountered background (BG)-to-lesion ratios on recovery correction. Methods Cylindrical and NEMA body phantoms were scanned following vendor-recommended ¹²⁴I acquisition using clinically representative activity concentrations (5.6–5.7 kBq/mL in cylindrical phantom, 45.1–59.2 kBq/mL in NEMA spheres) and BG-to-sphere ratios (∼1:125 to 1:infinity) using two digital PET/CT scanners (Philips Vereos and GE Healthcare Omni). Additionally, BG-to-sphere ratio ∼1:10 was acquired to compare ¹²⁴I to the EARL ¹⁸F standards 1 (EARL1). Calibration accuracy and recovery coefficients (RC_max, RC_mean) were compared between scanners with and without bias correction. Results ¹²⁴I recovery was ∼20% higher for the Omni compared to the Vereos, showing calibration accuracies of 1.12–1.15 vs. 0.94, and RC_mean reaching 0.86 vs. 0.69. After bias correction, RC_mean was comparable between scanners ('1%) but below the lower limits of EARL1. A single fit for recovery correction (R² = 0.97) was obtained for different BG-to-sphere ratios for both scanners as RC_mean was comparable (p ' 0.4). Conclusion Vendor-recommended ¹²⁴I acquisition and reconstruction leads to differences in quantification but can be compensated using a bias correction. Recovery correction is minimally affected by different BG-to-lesion ratios, suggesting that one RC curve is sufficient, simplifying ¹²⁴I calibration procedures in studies requiring ¹²⁴I quantification.

Background: Prior studies show that short-term treatment using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can reinduce radioiodine uptake and warrant ¹³¹I therapy in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAI-R DTC). We aim to evaluate the potential of standard-of-care TKI lenvatinib to reinduce clinically meaningful radioiodine retention. Methods: Nine RAI-R DTC patients starting lenvatinib treatment for progressive advanced or metastatic disease, were included and underwent rhTSH-stimulated ¹²⁴I dosimetric procedures at baseline, week 6 (N=7) and week 12 (N=8). At all timepoints, the fraction of patients eligible for ¹³¹I therapy with a maximal activity of 7.4 GBq was assessed. Patients were considered eligible if at least one target lesion showed an expected mean absorbed dose ≥20 Gy. In total, 23 target lesions were segmented on¹²⁴I PET/CT images and their volumes estimated using low-dose CT images. Lesion size-specific recovery correction was applied to the measured mean activity concentration at each timepoint. Tumor dosimetry was performed using a mono-exponential fit and S-values from an internal dosimetry program for diagnostic nuclear medicine based on the ICRP adult reference voxel phantoms (IDAC-Dose2.1). Mean absorbed lesion dose per administered activity (LDpA), 24h-uptake and residence time in target lesions were compared between time points. Results: By our definition, none of the patients were found eligible for ¹³¹I therapy at any timepoint. Lenvatinib-induced partial response was observed in 59% and 75% of target lesions at week 6 and 12, respectively. Median LDpA was 0.08 (IQR: 0.04-0.17), 0.18 (0.08-0.36) and 0.17 (0.09-0.37) Gy/GBq for week 0, 6 and 12, respectively (p=0.08). The 24h-uptake and residence time were comparable between timepoints (p>0.22). Conclusion: Redifferentiation of RAI-R DTC to reinduce radioiodine uptake to a level that warrants ¹³¹I therapy may not be established by short-term lenvatinib treatment. Multi-targeted TKIs may not be as potent as selective TKIs in reinducing clinically meaningful radioiodine retention.

Purpose: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis in which we compared a preoperative [¹⁸F]Fluorocholine PET/CT-based one-stop-shop imaging strategy with current best practice in which [¹⁸F]Fluorocholine PET/CT is only recommended after negative or inconclusive [^99mTc]Tc-methoxy isobutyl isonitrile SPECT/CT for patients suffering from primary hyperparathyroidism. We investigated whether the one-stop-shop strategy performs as well as current best practice but at lower costs. Methods: We developed a cohort-level state transition model to evaluate both imaging strategies respecting an intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitored treatment setting as well as a traditional treatment setting. The model reflects patients’ hospital journeys after biochemically diagnosed primary hyperparathyroidism. A cycle length of twelve months and a lifetime horizon were used. We conducted probabilistic analyses simulating 50,000 cohorts to assess joint parameter uncertainty. The incremental net monetary benefit and cost for each quality-adjusted life year were estimated. Furthermore, threshold analyses regarding the tariff of [¹⁸F]Fluorocholine PET/CT and the sensitivity of [^99mTc]Tc-methoxy isobutyl isonitrile SPECT/CT were performed. Results: The simulated long-term health effects and costs were similar for both imaging strategies. Accordingly, there was no incremental net monetary benefit and the one-stop-shop strategy did not result in lower costs. These results applied to both treatment settings. The threshold analysis indicated that a tariff of €885 for [¹⁸F]Fluorocholine PET/CT was required to be cost-effective compared to current best practice. Conclusion: Both preoperative imaging strategies can be used interchangeably. Daily clinical practice grounds such as available local resources and patient preferences should inform policy-making on whether a hospital should implement the one-stop-shop imaging strategy.

Background: Central necrosis can be detected on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT as a region with little to no tracer uptake. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the inclusion of regions of central necrosis during volume of interest (VOI) delineation for radiomic analysis. The aim of this study was to assess how central necrosis affects radiomic analysis in PET. Methods: Forty-three patients, either with non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC, n = 12) or with pheochromocytomas or paragangliomas (PPGL, n = 31), were included retrospectively. VOIs were delineated with and without central necrosis. From all VOIs, 105 radiomic features were extracted. Differences in radiomic features between delineation methods were assessed using a paired t-test with Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction. In the PPGL cohort, performances of the radiomic models to predict the noradrenergic biochemical profile were assessed by comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for both delineation methods. Results: At least 65% of the features showed significant differences between VOI_vital-tumour and VOI_gross-tumour (65%, 79% and 82% for the NSCLC, PPGL and combined cohort, respectively). The AUCs of the radiomic models were not significantly different between delineation methods. Conclusion: In both tumour types, almost two-third of the features were affected, demonstrating that the impact of whether or not to include central necrosis in the VOI on the radiomic feature values is significant. Nevertheless, predictive performances of both delineation methods were comparable. We recommend that radiomic studies should report whether or not central necrosis was included during delineation.