Optical Particle Sizers (OPSs) are widely used for measuring size distributions of particles larger than ca. 0.2 μm. To do so, they use mirrors or lenses to gather light scattered by particles passing through a focused beam, directing it to a photo-detector that produces electric pulses from the scattering events. Considering their ability to provide near real-time measurements with minimal attendance and maintenance, and to expand the networks of Particulate Matter (PM) monitoring, several manufacturers have developed low-cost and compact OPS systems. Despite that low-cost OPSs are already available in the market and employed for monitoring PM concentrations, their reported values typically deviate from those of high-end instruments, warranting further efforts to improve their performance. In this work, we designed and built a custom-made yet inexpensive OPS optical system, and studied its performance using a combination of computational and experimental methods at different flow conditions. Our results demonstrate the importance of the flow field within the OPS optical system, and how this can affect its counting and sizing ability. The overall performance of our OPS optical system is very similar to that of high-end instruments, exhibiting a counting efficiency of 50% for particles having a diameter of 320 nm, and a sizing resolution of below 15% for 500-nm particles, complying with the ISO 21501-1 and 21501-4 standards.

Modern electrochemical gas sensors hold great potential for improving practices in air quality (AQ) monitoring as their low cost, ease of operation and compact design can enable dense observational networks and mobile measurements. Despite that, however, numerous studies have shown that the performance of these sensors depends on a number of factors (e.g. environmental conditions, sensor quality, maintenance and calibration), thereby adding significant uncertainties in the reported measurements and large discrepancies from those recorded by reference-grade instruments. In this work we investigate the performance of electrochemical sensors, provided by two manufacturers (namely Alphasense and Winsen), for measuring the concentrations of CO, NO2, O3 and SO2. To achieve that we carried out collocated yearlong measurements with reference-grade instruments at a traffic AQ monitoring station in Nicosia, Cyprus, where temperatures ranged from ca. 0 ∘C in the winter to almost 45 ∘C in the summer. The CO sensors exhibit the best performance among all the ones we tested, having minimal mean relative error (MRE) compared to reference instruments (ca. −5 %), although a significant difference in their response was observed before and after the summer period. At the other end of the spectrum, the SO2 sensors reported concentration values that were at least 1 order of magnitude higher than the respective reference measurements (with MREs being more than 1000 % for Alphasense and almost 400 % for Winsen throughout the entire measurement period), which can be justified by the fact that the concentrations of SO2 at our measuring site were below their limit of detection. In general, variabilities in the environmental conditions (i.e. temperature and relative humidity) appear to significantly affect the performance of the sensors. When compared with reference instruments, the CO and NO2 electrochemical sensors provide measurements that exhibit increasing errors and decreasing correlations as temperature increases (from below 10 to above 30 ∘C) and RH decreases (from >75 % to below 30 %). Interestingly, the performance of the sensors was affected irreversibly during the hot summer period, exhibiting different responses before and after that, resulting in a signal deterioration that was more than twice that reported by the manufacturers. With the exception of the Alphasense NO2 sensor, all low-cost sensors (LCSs) exhibited measurement uncertainties that were much higher, even at the beginning of our measurement period, compared to those required for qualifying the sensors for indicative air quality measurements according to the respective European Commission (EC) Directive. Overall, our results show that the response of all LCSs is strongly affected by the environmental conditions, warranting further investigations on how they are manufactured, calibrated and employed in the field.