In recent years, mixed co-housing has been proposed as a solution to address two interconnected challenges in The Netherlands: providing housing for young starters, students and statusholders—refugees granted a residency permit—and fostering the integration of newcomers. Despite its potential, such projects often encounter significant obstacles, including navigating cultural differences, managing integration, and addressing the psychological needs of residents. These challenges test not only the tenants but also the organizations that support these initiatives.

This research and design project was set out to explore how Dutch students and newcomers could live together in ways that enable both groups to thrive. The aim was to foster mutual understanding and create an equitable exchange, using a combination of social and systemic design methods. A literature review on design, integration and mixed co-housing uncovered several key insights, which formed the lens in which subsequent research was viewed and developed. Integration, for example, is not a one-way process: while newcomers are expected to adapt to the local culture, it is equally important for locals to adapt to their new neighbors. Social capital, widely recognized in literature as a critical element in integration, is often overlooked in Dutch policies that prioritize measurable, tangible outcomes. Moreover, while mixed co-housing has the potential to create social connections, the reality often falls short of its idealistic vision, with barriers such as limited tenant autonomy hindering cohesion. Furthermore, tensions - rather than being obstacles - were put forth as valuable entry points for design.

Next, contextual research was conducted to delve into the experiences of mixed co-housing tenants and the perspectives of key stakeholders. Field interviews with housing organizations and tenants revealed a recurring tension: tenants have desire for greater autonomy while simultaneously having a desire for more support. This tension became the focal point for further exploration, prompting the design of a participatory session to uncover opportunities for intervention. Based on the analysis of this session, communication emerged as a critical area for improvement. A closer examination of previous research through the lens of communication further guided the development of an effective intervention.

Finally, through iterative development guided by, pilot testing, and evaluation, the final concept —Workshop Exploring ‘Home’— was designed. This workshop provides a platform for housemates to build shared understanding between groups and individuals, by exploring and communicating expectations around living together.