Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are complex neurodegenerative disorders of which the genetic basis remains incompletely understood. Hippocampal volume loss is a core hallmark of AD. Hippocampal volume also has a strong heritable component and its genetic underpinnings may help us to understand the complex biological mechanism underlying ADRD. To identify shared genetic risk loci across late-onset ADRD and bilateral hippocampal volumes, we conducted a cross-trait analysis of existing GWAS data on the two traits using the conjunctional false discovery rate (conjFDR) framework. Functional annotation and phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) were performed on the identified shared loci to characterize their biological relevance. We identified 11 unique lead genetic loci, of which 7 loci showed discordant directional effects (loci associated with increased risk for ADRD and smaller hippocampal volumes). We found that SHARPIN and TNIP1 genes play a role in ADRD by affecting hippocampal volumes. In addition, we observed 9 novel ADRD-hippocampus loci in genes previously implicated in AD (IGIP and ACE) and novel ADRD-genes (KCTD13, HINT1, SH3TC2, FAM53B, TPM1, IL34 and SSH2). PheWAS results show that most shared loci associated with neuroimaging measurements, white blood cell markers, red blood cell markers, and lipids. This study shows a shared genetic basis between ADRD and bilateral hippocampal volumes. By integrating summary statistics for these two traits, we identified both novel and previously reported ADRD-hippocampus loci. Functional analysis highlights the role of immune cells and lipid markers in the shared loci, suggesting a shared neurobiological basis for ADRD and bilateral hippocampal volumes.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is heterogenous at the molecular level. Understanding this heterogeneity is critical for AD drug development. Here we define AD molecular subtypes using mass spectrometry proteomics in cerebrospinal fluid, based on 1,058 proteins, with different levels in individuals with AD (n = 419) compared to controls (n = 187). These AD subtypes had alterations in protein levels that were associated with distinct molecular processes: subtype 1 was characterized by proteins related to neuronal hyperplasticity; subtype 2 by innate immune activation; subtype 3 by RNA dysregulation; subtype 4 by choroid plexus dysfunction; and subtype 5 by blood–brain barrier impairment. Each subtype was related to specific AD genetic risk variants, for example, subtype 1 was enriched with TREM2 R47H. Subtypes also differed in clinical outcomes, survival times and anatomical patterns of brain atrophy. These results indicate molecular heterogeneity in AD and highlight the need for personalized medicine.

Genetic factors play a major role in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). The majority of FTD cannot be genetically explained yet and it is likely that there are still FTD risk loci to be discovered. Common variants have been identified with genome-wide association studies (GWAS), but these studies have not systematically searched for rare variants. To identify rare and new common variant FTD risk loci and provide more insight into the heritability of C9ORF72-related FTD, we performed a GWAS consisting of 354 FTD patients (including and excluding N = 28 pathological repeat carriers) and 4209 control subjects. The Haplotype Reference Consortium was used as reference panel, allowing for the imputation of rare genetic variants. Two rare genetic variants nearby C9ORF72 were strongly associated with FTD in the discovery (rs147211831: OR = 4.8, P = 9.2 × 10⁻⁹, rs117204439: OR = 4.9, P = 6.0 × 10⁻⁹) and replication analysis (P < 1.1 × 10⁻³). These variants also significantly associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a publicly available dataset. Using haplotype analyses in 1200 individuals, we showed that these variants tag a sub-haplotype of the founder haplotype of the repeat expansion that was previously found to be present in virtually all pathological C9ORF72 G₄C₂ repeat lengths. This new risk haplotype was 10 times more likely to contain a C9ORF72 pathological repeat length compared to founder haplotypes without one of the two risk variants (~22% versus ~2%; P = 7.70 × 10⁻⁵⁸). In haplotypes without a pathologic expansion, the founder risk haplotype had a higher number of repeats (median = 12 repeats) compared to the founder haplotype without the risk variants (median = 8 repeats) (P = 2.05 × 10⁻²⁶⁰). In conclusion, the identified risk haplotype, which is carried by ~4% of all individuals, is a major risk factor for pathological repeat lengths of C9ORF72 G₄C₂. These findings strongly indicate that longer C9ORF72 repeats are unstable and more likely to convert to germline pathological C9ORF72 repeat expansions.