This thesis aims to investigate both the two-dimensional and three-dimensional (sub)structure of the butterfly martensite (α’BF) morphology. In order to do this, multiple different types of heat treatments were applied to a Fe-25Ni alloy to find the optimal morphology consisting of a low density of α’BF that is surrounded by austenite(γ). Two dimensional analyses were performed by applying a combination of optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD). The α’BF morphology was found to nucleate and grow as the first martensite (α’) morphology just below the martensite start temperature (Ms) within this 25Ni alloy. A decrease in austenisation time resulted in smaller γ grain sizes. This reduction in γ grain size resulted in a reduction of the Ms of the alloy which in its turn reduced the amount of undercooling applied to the material below Ms upon quenching towards room temperature, causing a decrease in the freshly formed α’ fraction. Upon observation of the freshly formed α’ it was found that the α’BF seemed to prefer formation near the centre of γ grains instead of near γ grain boundaries. When α’BF was formed near a γ grain boundaries, one wing tends to aligned itself with this boundary. Through trace analysis, it was found that the habit planes of α’BF were close to {557}γ, {225}γ and {3 10 15}γ, which are characteristic habit planes of lath, butterfly and lenticular α’, respectively. The orientation relationship (OR) between the γ and α’BF is found be a combination of both the Greninger-Troiano (G-T) and Nishiyama-Wasserman (N-W) OR. Three dimensional analysis was performed using both serial sectioning and 3D-EBSD. Serial sectioning showed that α’BF within this alloy was sensitive to formation upon mechanical polishing. 3D-EBSD gave insight on the three-dimensional morphology and substructure of the α’BF grains. It was observed that the junction plane could be non-continuous. Moreover, it is shown that the apparent wing angle greatly depends on the angle that the α’BF grain makes perpendicular to the sample surface and that the tail of the the α’BF grain can run along the entire length of the grain.

Quenching and Partitioning (Q&P) is a novel steel heat treatment to create microstructures containing martensite and retained austenite. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in applying Q&P treatments to martensitic stainless steels with the aim to create stainless steels with the mechanical properties of Advanced High-Strength Steels (AHSS). The development of Q&P stainless steels for lightweight structural applications could be a game changer for the automotive industry. The application of Q&P stainless steels can increase the service life of a car, reduce maintenance cost and contribute to lowering CO2 emissions. In this thesis, Q&P treatments with varying quenching temperatures were applied to two novel stainless steel alloys with composition 0.2C-0.35Si-0.7Mn-12.5Cr and 0.2C-0.35Si-3.0Mn-12.5Cr. The effect of quenching temperature and Mn content on the microstructure development was investigated using dilatometry, X-ray diffraction (XRD), optical microscopy, electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), electron probe micro analysis (EPMA) and phase field simulations. It was found that Mn addition lowers the optimal quenching temperature and increases the maximum retained austenite fraction that can be obtained by Q&P treatment. Austenite phase fractions of approximately 0.22 and 0.3 were stabilized in the microstructures of the low-Mn and the high-Mn alloy, respectively. The carbon concentration of retained austenite increases with decreasing quenching temperature but is much lower than expected from the full partitioning assumption. The non-uniform distribution of primary martensite and untransformed austenite as well as carbide precipitation was seen as a means by which austenite enrichment and retention are reduced. Additionally, results from this study indicate that segregation of Mn and Cr affects the local Ms temperature and causes microstructural banding of primary martensite which leads to a non-uniform retained austenite distribution in the final microstructure.