S.E. Tanzer
Please Note
7 records found
1
What will carbon dioxide removal look like in the Netherlands?
A Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathway approach
The diversity of available CDR methods, combined with unresolved questions surrounding permanence, funding mechanisms, and governance, complicates the development of effective policy. While the Netherlands has published a roadmap outlining possible CDR developments to 2050, uncertainties remain regarding which policy interventions will be required and how they should adapt over time.
This thesis examines the research question: What contribution can Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways (DAPP) make to the development of carbon dioxide removal in the Netherlands? DAPP was originally developed to deal with adaptation decision-making within water systems and has not previously been used for the CDR sector. Therefore, DAPP was applied to the Dutch CDR sector to assess its usefulness as a policy-support tool. Pathways were developed iteratively using academic literature and policy documents and subsequently evaluated through stakeholder interviews representing a range of perspectives within the Dutch CDR sector. Four pathway maps were constructed based on two scenario dimensions: free market versus mandated CDR and the eligibility of permanent CDR only versus both permanent and temporary removals.
The interviews highlighted significant uncertainty regarding the definition of permanence and the role of temporary removals. Stakeholders suggested that temporary removals may contribute to addressing short-term emissions, although implementation mechanisms remain unclear. Discussions also emphasised the need for additional financial incentives and regulatory space for setting up pilot projects as potential drivers of CDR deployment.
The DAPP approach proved valuable for identifying uncertainties, constraints, trade-offs, and stakeholder perspectives; however, the resulting pathway maps were less effective in supporting detailed policy analysis or the development of concrete policy measures. Policymakers should prioritise defining residual emissions, clarifying the role of temporary removals, and assessing funding or mandate-based mechanisms to support CDR deployment. Future policy should also consider competition for CCS storage capacity and continue supporting emerging technologies. Further research could strengthen the DAPP approach by exploring pathway development at a higher level of aggregation, where CDR is considered alongside mitigation measures, or an approach focusing on specific CDR methods.
...
The diversity of available CDR methods, combined with unresolved questions surrounding permanence, funding mechanisms, and governance, complicates the development of effective policy. While the Netherlands has published a roadmap outlining possible CDR developments to 2050, uncertainties remain regarding which policy interventions will be required and how they should adapt over time.
This thesis examines the research question: What contribution can Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways (DAPP) make to the development of carbon dioxide removal in the Netherlands? DAPP was originally developed to deal with adaptation decision-making within water systems and has not previously been used for the CDR sector. Therefore, DAPP was applied to the Dutch CDR sector to assess its usefulness as a policy-support tool. Pathways were developed iteratively using academic literature and policy documents and subsequently evaluated through stakeholder interviews representing a range of perspectives within the Dutch CDR sector. Four pathway maps were constructed based on two scenario dimensions: free market versus mandated CDR and the eligibility of permanent CDR only versus both permanent and temporary removals.
The interviews highlighted significant uncertainty regarding the definition of permanence and the role of temporary removals. Stakeholders suggested that temporary removals may contribute to addressing short-term emissions, although implementation mechanisms remain unclear. Discussions also emphasised the need for additional financial incentives and regulatory space for setting up pilot projects as potential drivers of CDR deployment.
The DAPP approach proved valuable for identifying uncertainties, constraints, trade-offs, and stakeholder perspectives; however, the resulting pathway maps were less effective in supporting detailed policy analysis or the development of concrete policy measures. Policymakers should prioritise defining residual emissions, clarifying the role of temporary removals, and assessing funding or mandate-based mechanisms to support CDR deployment. Future policy should also consider competition for CCS storage capacity and continue supporting emerging technologies. Further research could strengthen the DAPP approach by exploring pathway development at a higher level of aggregation, where CDR is considered alongside mitigation measures, or an approach focusing on specific CDR methods.
Equal Harm, Unequal Rules
A Functional-Equivalence Assessment of EU Crude Oil Supply Chains under RED III
Four representative supply chains (Alberta, Canada; Ekofisk, Norway; Niger Delta, Nigeria; and Ghawar, Saudi Arabia) are assessed against fifteen operationalised indicators derived from Articles 29(2)–(7) and 30 of RED III. These results are extended typologically to the fourteen largest EU import source countries using WWF biome classification and the 2017 Natural Resource Governance Index. This extension assigns compliance by biome similarity rather than site-specific assessment, and 22.7% of imports remain unassessed.
Under the strict primary scenario, only 17.6% of current EU crude oil imports qualify as compliant, and the share never exceeds 23.2% under any scenario. Governance failure, not ecological harm, is the primary driver of exclusion, accounting for 25.4% of imports against 8.0% on ecological grounds. Norway and the United Kingdom are the only confirmed compliant sources. Under no IEA demand scenario does compliant supply approach projected demand within the transition period.
The research concludes that the asymmetry between biomass and crude oil lacks an ecological justification: excluding crude oil from an equivalent framework is a political choice rather than an ecological one, and a form of environmental injustice. Because the compliance risk lies in governance rather than spatial overlap, and a hard threshold would exclude most imports at once, any equivalent framework would need to be governance-first, verification-based, and phased. ...
Four representative supply chains (Alberta, Canada; Ekofisk, Norway; Niger Delta, Nigeria; and Ghawar, Saudi Arabia) are assessed against fifteen operationalised indicators derived from Articles 29(2)–(7) and 30 of RED III. These results are extended typologically to the fourteen largest EU import source countries using WWF biome classification and the 2017 Natural Resource Governance Index. This extension assigns compliance by biome similarity rather than site-specific assessment, and 22.7% of imports remain unassessed.
Under the strict primary scenario, only 17.6% of current EU crude oil imports qualify as compliant, and the share never exceeds 23.2% under any scenario. Governance failure, not ecological harm, is the primary driver of exclusion, accounting for 25.4% of imports against 8.0% on ecological grounds. Norway and the United Kingdom are the only confirmed compliant sources. Under no IEA demand scenario does compliant supply approach projected demand within the transition period.
The research concludes that the asymmetry between biomass and crude oil lacks an ecological justification: excluding crude oil from an equivalent framework is a political choice rather than an ecological one, and a form of environmental injustice. Because the compliance risk lies in governance rather than spatial overlap, and a hard threshold would exclude most imports at once, any equivalent framework would need to be governance-first, verification-based, and phased.
Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of the European PET Packaging Sector
Analyzing Environmental Impacts of Feedstock Substitution under the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation for 2040
The research approach combines static prospective Material Flow Analysis (pMFA) with prospective Life Cycle Assessment (pLCA). Three foreground scenarios explore the Business-as-usual (BAU), PPWR recycled content targets (Scenario 1), and a potential Joint Target with bio-based-content targets (Scenario 2). The future PET packaging demand is represented by a packaging market mix. The pMFA uses data on projected feedstock shares from the Plastics Integrated Assessment (PLAIA), part of the Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) IMAGE, and is conducted in the subSTance flow ANalysis software. The pLCA adopts the ecoinvent v3.12 database modified using premise, applying the IAM IMAGE under three Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios based on SSP2 with medium emissions (SSP2-M), low emissions (SSP2-L), and very low high overshoot (SSP2-VLHO). The pLCA is performed in Activity Browser using the Environmental Footprint v3.1.
Results show that PPWR recycled content targets are highly environmentally beneficial, with Scenarios 1 and 2 reducing environmental impacts across all impact categories compared to BAU and achieving similar climate change impact reductions of -64% and -59%, respectively. Meeting the recycled content targets requires imports of recycled PET, indicating a risk of circularity leakage. A Joint Target, allowing bio-based feedstock to partially replace recycled feedstock, o]ers no additional advantage over recycled content targets, with Scenario 2 showing moderately higher environmental impacts than Scenario 1. The largest di]erences are observed in land use (-17 percentage points (pp)), terrestrial eutrophication, and particulate matter formation (both -10 pp), all relative to BAU. At the process level, energy production and manufacturing are the dominant contributors across most impact categories. At the life cycle stage level, PET polymer production and EoL management emerge as hotspots, with Bio-PET showing disproportionately high land use impacts in Scenario 2. The baseline assumes sugar beet as the biomass source for bioethanol and wood for terephthalic acid production. Sensitivity analysis with wheat for bioethanol production shows similar results.
Policy recommendations include scaling up recycling infrastructure to address the identified risk of circularity leakage and prioritizing demand reduction and reuse quotas. Main limitations include uncertainties resulting from reconciling multiple data sources in the pMFA, and the lack of prospective foreground unit process data for the chemical sector in the pLCA. Future research should develop and integrate such data, develop regional classification in IMAGE aligned with political entities, and evaluate the effects of the PPWR on further packaging materials to allow cross-sector assessment.
Resolver link to Supplementary data: Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of the European PET Packaging Sector: https://doi.org/10.4121/508cfd64-f031-47ff-ae86-58f0b21b7a51 ...
The research approach combines static prospective Material Flow Analysis (pMFA) with prospective Life Cycle Assessment (pLCA). Three foreground scenarios explore the Business-as-usual (BAU), PPWR recycled content targets (Scenario 1), and a potential Joint Target with bio-based-content targets (Scenario 2). The future PET packaging demand is represented by a packaging market mix. The pMFA uses data on projected feedstock shares from the Plastics Integrated Assessment (PLAIA), part of the Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) IMAGE, and is conducted in the subSTance flow ANalysis software. The pLCA adopts the ecoinvent v3.12 database modified using premise, applying the IAM IMAGE under three Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios based on SSP2 with medium emissions (SSP2-M), low emissions (SSP2-L), and very low high overshoot (SSP2-VLHO). The pLCA is performed in Activity Browser using the Environmental Footprint v3.1.
Results show that PPWR recycled content targets are highly environmentally beneficial, with Scenarios 1 and 2 reducing environmental impacts across all impact categories compared to BAU and achieving similar climate change impact reductions of -64% and -59%, respectively. Meeting the recycled content targets requires imports of recycled PET, indicating a risk of circularity leakage. A Joint Target, allowing bio-based feedstock to partially replace recycled feedstock, o]ers no additional advantage over recycled content targets, with Scenario 2 showing moderately higher environmental impacts than Scenario 1. The largest di]erences are observed in land use (-17 percentage points (pp)), terrestrial eutrophication, and particulate matter formation (both -10 pp), all relative to BAU. At the process level, energy production and manufacturing are the dominant contributors across most impact categories. At the life cycle stage level, PET polymer production and EoL management emerge as hotspots, with Bio-PET showing disproportionately high land use impacts in Scenario 2. The baseline assumes sugar beet as the biomass source for bioethanol and wood for terephthalic acid production. Sensitivity analysis with wheat for bioethanol production shows similar results.
Policy recommendations include scaling up recycling infrastructure to address the identified risk of circularity leakage and prioritizing demand reduction and reuse quotas. Main limitations include uncertainties resulting from reconciling multiple data sources in the pMFA, and the lack of prospective foreground unit process data for the chemical sector in the pLCA. Future research should develop and integrate such data, develop regional classification in IMAGE aligned with political entities, and evaluate the effects of the PPWR on further packaging materials to allow cross-sector assessment.
Resolver link to Supplementary data: Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of the European PET Packaging Sector: https://doi.org/10.4121/508cfd64-f031-47ff-ae86-58f0b21b7a51
Sinking Seaweed, Rising Questions
An LCA of Macroalgae Cultivation and Sinking for Carbon Dioxide Removal
Mapping EU Carbon Policy
A Carbon Flow Analysis and Policy Coverage Assessment of EU Carbon Governance
Enabling International Electric Truck Transport by Integrating Megawatt Charging Infrastructure in The Netherlands
An Agent-Based Simulation Approach
Towards negative emissions in the cement industry
A comparative techno-economic assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage as a decarbonization option for the cement industry