P. Osseweijer
Please Note
8 records found
1
Towards a just bioeconomy
Lessons from emerging bio-based value chains in Spain, Colombia and Namibia
The transition to a bioeconomy, where biomass replaces fossil resources to produce energy and materials, is expected not only to contribute significantly to tackling climate change but also to generate socio-economic and environmental benefits in biomass-producing regions. While technological innovation is a key driver of this transition, achieving a sustainable bioeconomy requires a broader societal transformation involving multiple stakeholders who both shape and are affected by how the bioeconomy is developed and governed. Although new BBVCs can create opportunities for producers to diversify income and improve practices, they have also been criticized for negative environmental and social consequences. Ensuring that BBVCs realize their potential, therefore, depends on understanding how they can be developed in ways that are both sustainable and socially equitable. This is especially critical for rural contexts in the Global South, where a large part of the available biomass is produced and where poverty and socio-economic exclusion are widespread, particularly among smallholder farmers.
By studying three diverse cases of prospective BBVCs based on waste biomass - olive oil residues in Spain, coffee and cocoa residues in Colombia, and encroacher bush in Namibia - this research provides insights into the social dynamics that shape the potential for a just bioeconomy transition. The central research question of this dissertation is: How to develop secure, inclusive, and sustainable bio-based value chains that take into account the needs, knowledge, skills, and values of all relevant actors, with special attention to actors at the beginning of the chain? ...
The transition to a bioeconomy, where biomass replaces fossil resources to produce energy and materials, is expected not only to contribute significantly to tackling climate change but also to generate socio-economic and environmental benefits in biomass-producing regions. While technological innovation is a key driver of this transition, achieving a sustainable bioeconomy requires a broader societal transformation involving multiple stakeholders who both shape and are affected by how the bioeconomy is developed and governed. Although new BBVCs can create opportunities for producers to diversify income and improve practices, they have also been criticized for negative environmental and social consequences. Ensuring that BBVCs realize their potential, therefore, depends on understanding how they can be developed in ways that are both sustainable and socially equitable. This is especially critical for rural contexts in the Global South, where a large part of the available biomass is produced and where poverty and socio-economic exclusion are widespread, particularly among smallholder farmers.
By studying three diverse cases of prospective BBVCs based on waste biomass - olive oil residues in Spain, coffee and cocoa residues in Colombia, and encroacher bush in Namibia - this research provides insights into the social dynamics that shape the potential for a just bioeconomy transition. The central research question of this dissertation is: How to develop secure, inclusive, and sustainable bio-based value chains that take into account the needs, knowledge, skills, and values of all relevant actors, with special attention to actors at the beginning of the chain?
Simulating pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass for bio-oil production and upgrading techniques for sustainable biofuel generation
Aspen Plus simulations, comparison of soft- and hardwood bio-oil
This thesis presents a conceptual process model in Aspen Plus to simulate the thermal decomposition of lignocellulosic biomass into bio-oil and its subsequent upgrading into usable biofuels. The model combines pyrolysis kinetics with hydrodeoxygenation reactions to predict bio-oil and biofuel yields for various feedstocks. Simplifications, including species lumping, were necessary to ensure model feasibility but limited its accuracy and broader applicability.
The results show that the model performs best at pyrolysis reactor temperatures of 550–650 °C and vapor residence times of 2–3 seconds. Hydrodeoxygenation predictions align with literature in terms of hydrogen requirements and overall fuel yield, though limitations in distillation modelling result in a lack of detailed analysis for the fuel fractions. A comparative analysis of softwood and hardwood feedstocks reveals that woods with higher cellulose content yield greater bio-oil and biofuel quantities. However, this comparison overlooks the influence of other factors, such as specific lignin composition and structural differences, which also affect pyrolysis behaviour in real-life applications.
While the model provides insights into pyrolysis and upgrading processes, it demonstrates the need for further refinement to account for complex reaction mechanisms and real-world variability. ...
This thesis presents a conceptual process model in Aspen Plus to simulate the thermal decomposition of lignocellulosic biomass into bio-oil and its subsequent upgrading into usable biofuels. The model combines pyrolysis kinetics with hydrodeoxygenation reactions to predict bio-oil and biofuel yields for various feedstocks. Simplifications, including species lumping, were necessary to ensure model feasibility but limited its accuracy and broader applicability.
The results show that the model performs best at pyrolysis reactor temperatures of 550–650 °C and vapor residence times of 2–3 seconds. Hydrodeoxygenation predictions align with literature in terms of hydrogen requirements and overall fuel yield, though limitations in distillation modelling result in a lack of detailed analysis for the fuel fractions. A comparative analysis of softwood and hardwood feedstocks reveals that woods with higher cellulose content yield greater bio-oil and biofuel quantities. However, this comparison overlooks the influence of other factors, such as specific lignin composition and structural differences, which also affect pyrolysis behaviour in real-life applications.
While the model provides insights into pyrolysis and upgrading processes, it demonstrates the need for further refinement to account for complex reaction mechanisms and real-world variability.
Bridging Technology and Society
Towards context-specific, inclusive, and sustainable design of bio-based value chains for marine biofuels
The research first establishes that biobased SAF constitutes an emerging, complex sector that interacts with multiple industries and societal stakeholders. Given its developmental stage, assessing its full sustainability performance early on is vital for guiding policy and investment decisions. The thesis develops and applies methodological approaches to quantitatively evaluate underexplored sustainability dimensions, focusing on socioeconomic effects, life cycle human health impacts, and the balance between SAF supply and demand under future decarbonization scenarios.
The socioeconomic assessment employs a scenario-based Input-Output (IO) analysis, using Brazil’s projected SAF demand toward 2050 as a case study. The analysis demonstrates that biobased SAF production can generate substantial positive socioeconomic benefits, including net gains in employment and GDP. However, these benefits vary by feedstock type and conversion technology, highlighting the need for region-specific policies to optimize socioeconomic outcomes. Modest negative impacts on trade balance and fossil-sector employment are identified, for which proactive mitigation measures—such as retraining programs and labor reallocation—are recommended to ensure a just transition.
To complement the socioeconomic analysis, the thesis explores human health impacts through a comparative evaluation of six life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods. The results reveal that biomass conversion processes are the primary contributors to health-related impacts due to chemical use, energy consumption, and waste generation, followed by feedstock cultivation involving fertilizers and pesticides. The study concludes that no single LCIA method can universally capture human health effects in SAF systems; rather, the methodological choice should be context-specific, guided by study scope and regional conditions.
Further, a supply-demand analysis examines the potential of biobased SAF to meet the aviation sector’s decarbonization targets by 2050. Using European data and multiple scenarios, the findings suggest that sufficient SAF supply is only attainable if feedstock availability exceeds 60% of theoretical potential—an unlikely scenario given competition from other bio-based industries. The results underscore the regional variability in biomass distribution and the importance of aligning national and continental strategies.
Overall, the thesis concludes that biobased SAF holds significant promise in reducing greenhouse gas emissions—up to 75% compared to fossil jet fuel—while promoting socioeconomic development. However, its sustainability performance is highly context-dependent, influenced by technology choice, feedstock type, and policy design. The work advances an operational framework for integrated sustainability assessment that identifies trade-offs and synergies, supporting informed decision-making for SAF deployment. Beyond aviation, the methodological insights contribute to broader discussions on designing fair, effective, and context-sensitive transitions toward a sustainable bioeconomy.
...
The research first establishes that biobased SAF constitutes an emerging, complex sector that interacts with multiple industries and societal stakeholders. Given its developmental stage, assessing its full sustainability performance early on is vital for guiding policy and investment decisions. The thesis develops and applies methodological approaches to quantitatively evaluate underexplored sustainability dimensions, focusing on socioeconomic effects, life cycle human health impacts, and the balance between SAF supply and demand under future decarbonization scenarios.
The socioeconomic assessment employs a scenario-based Input-Output (IO) analysis, using Brazil’s projected SAF demand toward 2050 as a case study. The analysis demonstrates that biobased SAF production can generate substantial positive socioeconomic benefits, including net gains in employment and GDP. However, these benefits vary by feedstock type and conversion technology, highlighting the need for region-specific policies to optimize socioeconomic outcomes. Modest negative impacts on trade balance and fossil-sector employment are identified, for which proactive mitigation measures—such as retraining programs and labor reallocation—are recommended to ensure a just transition.
To complement the socioeconomic analysis, the thesis explores human health impacts through a comparative evaluation of six life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods. The results reveal that biomass conversion processes are the primary contributors to health-related impacts due to chemical use, energy consumption, and waste generation, followed by feedstock cultivation involving fertilizers and pesticides. The study concludes that no single LCIA method can universally capture human health effects in SAF systems; rather, the methodological choice should be context-specific, guided by study scope and regional conditions.
Further, a supply-demand analysis examines the potential of biobased SAF to meet the aviation sector’s decarbonization targets by 2050. Using European data and multiple scenarios, the findings suggest that sufficient SAF supply is only attainable if feedstock availability exceeds 60% of theoretical potential—an unlikely scenario given competition from other bio-based industries. The results underscore the regional variability in biomass distribution and the importance of aligning national and continental strategies.
Overall, the thesis concludes that biobased SAF holds significant promise in reducing greenhouse gas emissions—up to 75% compared to fossil jet fuel—while promoting socioeconomic development. However, its sustainability performance is highly context-dependent, influenced by technology choice, feedstock type, and policy design. The work advances an operational framework for integrated sustainability assessment that identifies trade-offs and synergies, supporting informed decision-making for SAF deployment. Beyond aviation, the methodological insights contribute to broader discussions on designing fair, effective, and context-sensitive transitions toward a sustainable bioeconomy.
The main question addressed in this thesis is: “How to create an environment that is suitable to learn safely and responsibly what uncertain risks associated with emerging biotechnologies entail?”. I conclude that to enable responsible learning by means of SbD, 3 conditions are needed; regulatory flexibility, co-responsibility and awareness. Thereby, SbD could be a suitable approach to arrive at responsible learning, given that the 3 conditions are met. If not, SbD provides guidelines to lower or mitigate known risks but fails to provide a step-by-step approach to gradually learn what uncertain risks entail. This will leave a knowledge gap between known and uncertain risks which stifles innovation and hinders risk management in ensuring future safety for people, animals and the environment.
...
The main question addressed in this thesis is: “How to create an environment that is suitable to learn safely and responsibly what uncertain risks associated with emerging biotechnologies entail?”. I conclude that to enable responsible learning by means of SbD, 3 conditions are needed; regulatory flexibility, co-responsibility and awareness. Thereby, SbD could be a suitable approach to arrive at responsible learning, given that the 3 conditions are met. If not, SbD provides guidelines to lower or mitigate known risks but fails to provide a step-by-step approach to gradually learn what uncertain risks entail. This will leave a knowledge gap between known and uncertain risks which stifles innovation and hinders risk management in ensuring future safety for people, animals and the environment.
Seizing the opportunities from the energy transition
A study of the Port of Rotterdam
To support the decision making on which activities to should focus on, there is an urgent need for a decision tool at the PoR authority.
The main conclusion, however, is that it is impossible to develop a decision tool which is able to make a choice among different activities. This decision is impossible because every activity has its own demands and requirements and differs in the contribution it has to the strategic goals. Besides this, the set requirements cannot be expressed in a single unit, leading to the situation that a comparison cannot be judged.
Following from the above, it is being discouraged to develop a decision tool. The allocation process and the involved requirements are too versatile to be simplified in a single tool. If such a simplification is made, this will result in missing essential opportunities and potential bottlenecks in the sequential project phases.
Based on the above conclusions, it is investigated whether it is possible to provide the PoR authority with guidelines that support the comparison of different activities. To do so, the involved requirements in the allocation process are substantiated. These requirements are evaluated from three different points of view: demand side (client), resources side (Port of Rotterdam authority) and their priority in the decision making. By means of the evaluation, the aspects have been identified that must be implemented into the guidelines.
In addition to the requirements, it is important for the PoR authority to incorporate its communicated strategy into the daily activities. To do so, the commercial strategy has been developed. At first sight, the integration of the commercial strategy is not acknowledged to be a requirement in the allocation process. Though, as the research proceeded, it turned out that the commercial strategy has a more important role in the decision making than anticipated. Resulting in the situation that if the PoR authority is really looking to fulfil its climate targets, the commercial strategy should function as a self-contained requirement in the allocation process.
From the conclusions, the recommendation for the PoR authority is to develop a central team that involves the experts of the relevant requirements to judge the potential activities. This team will have the primary task to evaluate and judge the potential activities prior to entering the project phases. The judgement of the potential activities will be founded on four main themes for evaluation: demand, supply, priority and contribution to the commercial strategy.
Though, this recommendation is not aimed at making the decision itself. The main focus is to supply the evaluations on the potential activities to the decision makers. The decision itself will be based on the supplied evaluations through which a decision can be made on which activities should be allocated in the PoR.
...
To support the decision making on which activities to should focus on, there is an urgent need for a decision tool at the PoR authority.
The main conclusion, however, is that it is impossible to develop a decision tool which is able to make a choice among different activities. This decision is impossible because every activity has its own demands and requirements and differs in the contribution it has to the strategic goals. Besides this, the set requirements cannot be expressed in a single unit, leading to the situation that a comparison cannot be judged.
Following from the above, it is being discouraged to develop a decision tool. The allocation process and the involved requirements are too versatile to be simplified in a single tool. If such a simplification is made, this will result in missing essential opportunities and potential bottlenecks in the sequential project phases.
Based on the above conclusions, it is investigated whether it is possible to provide the PoR authority with guidelines that support the comparison of different activities. To do so, the involved requirements in the allocation process are substantiated. These requirements are evaluated from three different points of view: demand side (client), resources side (Port of Rotterdam authority) and their priority in the decision making. By means of the evaluation, the aspects have been identified that must be implemented into the guidelines.
In addition to the requirements, it is important for the PoR authority to incorporate its communicated strategy into the daily activities. To do so, the commercial strategy has been developed. At first sight, the integration of the commercial strategy is not acknowledged to be a requirement in the allocation process. Though, as the research proceeded, it turned out that the commercial strategy has a more important role in the decision making than anticipated. Resulting in the situation that if the PoR authority is really looking to fulfil its climate targets, the commercial strategy should function as a self-contained requirement in the allocation process.
From the conclusions, the recommendation for the PoR authority is to develop a central team that involves the experts of the relevant requirements to judge the potential activities. This team will have the primary task to evaluate and judge the potential activities prior to entering the project phases. The judgement of the potential activities will be founded on four main themes for evaluation: demand, supply, priority and contribution to the commercial strategy.
Though, this recommendation is not aimed at making the decision itself. The main focus is to supply the evaluations on the potential activities to the decision makers. The decision itself will be based on the supplied evaluations through which a decision can be made on which activities should be allocated in the PoR.
The why’s and how’s of public sector scientists’ policy engagement
The lessons from agricultural biotechnology
addressing the challenges associated with climate change and
the growing human population. Due to progress in science
and technology the biobased economy can provide additional
food and renewable energy to meet the needs of the expected
9 billion people by 2050.
However, the implementation of the biobased economy also
raises many questions about the transition paths, including the
political and regulatory climate for new technologies that are
necessary to accomplish this transition. Policy decisions and
new regulations require input from the scientific community.
While most policy stakeholders agree that we need new technologies
that can reduce or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions,
we witness controversy about the best solutions to realize
sustainable production. Scientists have the potential to play an
important role in policy debates and processes, but presently
their involvement is not adequate.
This thesis explores how scientists perceive their role in policymaking
and which factors are relevant for their motivation for
policy engagement. Using the empirical data from the research
with agricultural biotechnology scientists this thesis identifies and
describes a new role for scientists in controversial policy-making
and provides recommendations for institutional strategies that
are needed to facilitate that scientists adopt this role in practice. ...
addressing the challenges associated with climate change and
the growing human population. Due to progress in science
and technology the biobased economy can provide additional
food and renewable energy to meet the needs of the expected
9 billion people by 2050.
However, the implementation of the biobased economy also
raises many questions about the transition paths, including the
political and regulatory climate for new technologies that are
necessary to accomplish this transition. Policy decisions and
new regulations require input from the scientific community.
While most policy stakeholders agree that we need new technologies
that can reduce or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions,
we witness controversy about the best solutions to realize
sustainable production. Scientists have the potential to play an
important role in policy debates and processes, but presently
their involvement is not adequate.
This thesis explores how scientists perceive their role in policymaking
and which factors are relevant for their motivation for
policy engagement. Using the empirical data from the research
with agricultural biotechnology scientists this thesis identifies and
describes a new role for scientists in controversial policy-making
and provides recommendations for institutional strategies that
are needed to facilitate that scientists adopt this role in practice.