Corporate real estate strategies and organizational culture

Journal Article (2018)
Authors

I. Nase (TU Delft - Real Estate Management)

Monique H. Arkesteijn (TU Delft - Real Estate Management)

Research Group
Real Estate Management
Copyright
© 2018 I. Nase, M.H. Arkesteijn
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-10-2017-0035
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 I. Nase, M.H. Arkesteijn
Research Group
Real Estate Management
Issue number
3
Volume number
20
Pages (from-to)
154-176
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-10-2017-0035
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate how strategic corporate real estate (CRE) management varies across different types of organizational culture. Additionally, the authors examine how a set of well-established strategies is categorized by CRE executives and investigate whether there have been any changes in priorities of managers’ rating in importance of these strategies compared to a post-GFC study. Design/methodology/approach: A wide-scale survey of CRE managers was undertaken in summer 2016. Two key components of the survey are namely importance scoring of CRE strategies after the framework of Gibler and Lindholm (2012) and organizational culture assessment based on the competing values framework of Cameron and Quinn (2006). Analysis of CRE strategy importance is undertaken based on the average score comparison per each cultural family, and additional features are reported based on the industry sector, firm size and CRE department size. Principal component analysis is used to provide statistical evidence on the grouping of CRE strategies by practitioners. Findings: Empirical evidence points toward a clear division on the organizational culture dimension that differentiates effectiveness criteria of flexibility and discretion from stability and control. More specifically, clan and adhocracy cultural types prioritize employee-centric CRE strategies, whereas hierarchy and market cultures consider “Reducing real estate cost” as their single most influential strategy. Research limitations/implications: The competing values framework has been adapted from the original ipsative scoring process to reflect the fact that only one respondent per firm assesses their organization’s culture. Practical implications: The findings of this study are useful to CRE managers striving for maximum strategic fit within their firms as they unveil clear patterns of CRE strategy prioritization among different organizational culture types. Originality/value: To the authors’ best knowledge, this is the first study that analyzes the inter-relationships among CRE strategies and organizational culture variations. Additionally, the paper provides a categorization of CRE strategies through statistical methods that follow a clear pattern based on the scope of each strategy.

Files

JCRE_10_2017_0035.pdf
(pdf | 0.653 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 31-12-2018
License info not available